Content deleted Content added
Alexandria (talk | contribs) Archiving case from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamtrhino |
Alexandria (talk | contribs) Archiving case from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamtrhino |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
: I also see a very clear /19 IP range that could be softblocked with ACB that would have minimal impact on others- [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: comic sans ms">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 03:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
: I also see a very clear /19 IP range that could be softblocked with ACB that would have minimal impact on others- [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: comic sans ms">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 03:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
*If you can do the /19 block, go for it. All of these accounts are blocked, so we're done here. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 04:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
*If you can do the /19 block, go for it. All of these accounts are blocked, so we're done here. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 04:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
|||
=====<big>07 December 2011</big>===== |
|||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=VanshKaushal}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
*[http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Iamtrhino User compare report] <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> |
|||
clearly an iamtrhino sock. same edits on same pages...incredible. i suggest a range block. ps: he also blanked this page twice.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Iamtrhino&diff=464617037&oldid=464616909] <small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;background:blue;">[[User:Mustihussain|<font style="color:white;background:red;font-family:sans-serif;">''' mustihussain '''</font>]]</span></small> 19:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
|||
*{{confirmed}} and blocked, looking for sleepers. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 19:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*No sleepers. {{IPBlocked}}. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 19:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*{{adminnote}} I've protected a bunch of articles. We're done. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 01:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 16:56, 8 December 2011
06 December 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- BredyLawson (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
This account was mentioned on my talk page. I've blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK, but am endorsing for more sleepers, as well as if we can get an IP block, given that the previous case was a day ago. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Confirmed - the following accounts as being the same editor;
- Iamtrhino (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- BredyLawson (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
.. and some older, already blocked accounts;
- Arinjatt (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Desijattt (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) etc ....
- I also see a very clear /19 IP range that could be softblocked with ACB that would have minimal impact on others- Alison ❤ 03:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you can do the /19 block, go for it. All of these accounts are blocked, so we're done here. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 04:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
07 December 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- VanshKaushal (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
clearly an iamtrhino sock. same edits on same pages...incredible. i suggest a range block. ps: he also blanked this page twice.[1] mustihussain 19:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Confirmed and blocked, looking for sleepers. Courcelles 19:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- No sleepers. IP blocked. Courcelles 19:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Administrator note I've protected a bunch of articles. We're done. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)