HelloAnnyong (talk | contribs) Comment, marking case as closed |
Iadrian yu (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
Please note also that Iaaasi being an extremely experienced sockpuppeter and one who have already demonstrated usage of both proxies and meatpuppets (accounts created to post to wikipedia what he writes) CheckUser is not relevant to this case and instead the contributions should be examined and compared to that of Iaaasi and sockpuppets. The thing to determine here ; is Daccono acting on behalf of Iaaasi always posting into wikipedia what Iaaasi writes and editing what Iaaasi wants edited. [[User:Hobartimus|Hobartimus]] ([[User talk:Hobartimus|talk]]) 21:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
Please note also that Iaaasi being an extremely experienced sockpuppeter and one who have already demonstrated usage of both proxies and meatpuppets (accounts created to post to wikipedia what he writes) CheckUser is not relevant to this case and instead the contributions should be examined and compared to that of Iaaasi and sockpuppets. The thing to determine here ; is Daccono acting on behalf of Iaaasi always posting into wikipedia what Iaaasi writes and editing what Iaaasi wants edited. [[User:Hobartimus|Hobartimus]] ([[User talk:Hobartimus|talk]]) 21:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
* ''Comment'' - I was recently also accused as being a sock of Iaaasi and I was checked by check user (as I can notice Daccono was also). I am beginning to think that by this unjustified bloc (by my opinion) the "shield" around some articles is created and I for example am starting to be afraid to edit them because I could be accused also of beign a sock again.. and despite the check user that cleared me and that I don`t have any connection to Iaaasi, I could also be blocked. Is this block really necessary and is Daccono ''really'' a sock of Iaaasi??? If Daccono was blocked by this I guess in the future I could also be blocked (unless I avoid articles that Iaaasi edited, or any of his socks..). [[User:Iadrian yu|Adrian]] ([[User talk:Iadrian yu|talk]]) 09:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 09:25, 17 November 2011
Iaaasi
- Iaaasi (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
16 November 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Daccono (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Identical contributions, such as these two. Relevant ANI thread here. Calabe1992 21:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Please note also that Iaaasi being an extremely experienced sockpuppeter and one who have already demonstrated usage of both proxies and meatpuppets (accounts created to post to wikipedia what he writes) CheckUser is not relevant to this case and instead the contributions should be examined and compared to that of Iaaasi and sockpuppets. The thing to determine here ; is Daccono acting on behalf of Iaaasi always posting into wikipedia what Iaaasi writes and editing what Iaaasi wants edited. Hobartimus (talk) 21:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - I was recently also accused as being a sock of Iaaasi and I was checked by check user (as I can notice Daccono was also). I am beginning to think that by this unjustified bloc (by my opinion) the "shield" around some articles is created and I for example am starting to be afraid to edit them because I could be accused also of beign a sock again.. and despite the check user that cleared me and that I don`t have any connection to Iaaasi, I could also be blocked. Is this block really necessary and is Daccono really a sock of Iaaasi??? If Daccono was blocked by this I guess in the future I could also be blocked (unless I avoid articles that Iaaasi edited, or any of his socks..). Adrian (talk) 09:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Likely - Looks like he is attempting to use new IP ranges and Useragents. Give the following block log entry: (del/undel) 21:17, 12 August 2010 PeterSymonds (talk | contribs | block) unblocked Daccono (talk | contribs) (Behaviour and technical evidence (as discussed with a CheckUser) seems to indicate this account is unrelated to the Bonaparte/Iassi socks. ) I might recommend contacting PeterSymonds before taking administrative action. Tiptoety talk 00:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't remember many specifics, but the CU didn't seem to think it was Iaaasi, and after further digging, the pair of us decided there were too many differences. I'm happy with the finding of this check, especially in light of the recent edits. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Administrator note Per the findings I've blocked and tagged Daccono. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)