Hetoum I
- Hetoum I (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 31 2010, 08:26 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Shamshadin (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- CaptainGio (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- AzerbaboonYuzbashi (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- AzeriHentai (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ErmeniQuzeyli (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ivanyan (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Grandmaster
Shamshadin (talk · contribs) is an obvious SPA, which popped up after the previous bunch of socks was blocked, and picked the edit war on Erivan Khanate. In addition to CU, I think admins need to consider long term semi-protection of the above mentioned article. The disruption by the banned user resumed soon after the previous semi-protection expired. Please see the archives for the related IPs. Grandmaster 08:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: A + E (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion and community ban/sanction evasion)
- Current status –
Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Grandmaster 08:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed Endorsing for the first account. According to the archive, a CU was already done for the other two, with the socks listed as likely. They were only blocked for 24 hours though, so I suspect this needs to be adjusted.
Clerk note: Changed to "endorse". Auntie E. (talk) 04:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Found some more socks related to Shamshadin.
- Stepanakertsi (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheKillerNite (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
There are (apparantly) two different lots of socks at work here. I've hopefully silenced at least one lot of them. --Deskana (talk) 02:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)