No edit summary |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
David Dial is a POV-pusher who accuses everyone he doesn't like as being a sock. User:Jack Patern was accused and banned without even a checkuser done. This tactic of accusations against editors who you don't like must stop. If the checkuser shows no link (and there isn't because I am not these people), then David Dial should be blocked for incivility and edit warring. [[User:Midemer|Midemer]] ([[User talk:Midemer|talk]]) 03:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 03:25, 26 February 2012
Gaydenver
- Gaydenver (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
26 February 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Midemer (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
USer started editing the Obama article with one of his/her first edits, restoring claims made another editor accusing Wikipedia of "pro Obama bias" and "propaganda". The user then went to ANI the same day, after making 2 edits concerning Obama. The user was blocked for edit warring on the Obama article, and disrupting the Talk page. The user then stopped editing for more than 2 years, and has now went directly back to the Obama article.
UCC is better than Christian edits Midemer JB50000
I am the only non-biased editor on Wikipedia, everyone else is a Obama fan or "inbreeder" Midemer JB50000
"We have consensus"(false claims of consensus, even when obviously is not true) Midemer JB50000
Now, to me, this is a painfully obvious DUCK, but a CU should be done in order to flush out any other accounts this user has. And after all these accounts keep popping up, it's obvious he/she has them. Dave Dial (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
David Dial is a POV-pusher who accuses everyone he doesn't like as being a sock. User:Jack Patern was accused and banned without even a checkuser done. This tactic of accusations against editors who you don't like must stop. If the checkuser shows no link (and there isn't because I am not these people), then David Dial should be blocked for incivility and edit warring. Midemer (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)