Content deleted Content added
Marking case as closed, archiving case to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole/Archive |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Echigo mole}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Echigo mole}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status}} |
|||
=====<big>13 May 2012</big>===== |
|||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
|||
* {{checkip|1=94.196.27.59}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
*[http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Echigo%20mole User compare report] <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> |
|||
More disruptive trolling on the arbcom review pages on the same tired old theme that Echigo mole is not banned. However, that is not the view of administrators at [[WP:SPI]] or of the arbitration committee. The last ipsock was blocked for trolling by Elen of the Roads and I suspect that something similar will happen this time. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 15:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
|||
---- |
|||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 15:59, 13 May 2012
Echigo mole
- Echigo mole (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole/Archive.
13 May 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
More disruptive trolling on the arbcom review pages on the same tired old theme that Echigo mole is not banned. However, that is not the view of administrators at WP:SPI or of the arbitration committee. The last ipsock was blocked for trolling by Elen of the Roads and I suspect that something similar will happen this time. Mathsci (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.