CU results |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
*Previous socks have used proxies, making this {{inconclusive}}. I will say though that this account does not appear to be using an open proxy. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 04:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
*Previous socks have used proxies, making this {{inconclusive}}. I will say though that this account does not appear to be using an open proxy. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 04:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
:*Actually, I dug a little deeper and found a blocked sock account with a workable IP. They both geolocate to the same area, making the connection {{possible}}. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 04:46, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 04:46, 27 April 2012
CentristFiasco
- CentristFiasco (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
27 April 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Maria Barzini (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
[1] This sockmaster's infamous "awareness movement" and "socialist" claims among other equally infamous major revamps of Occupy Wall Street. Equazcion (talk) 03:26, 27 Apr 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Since when is associating something with "Socialism" a bad thing? For crying at loud, for a person who can edit his own Wikipedia page as if its own site and apparently contributed a lot, you sure don't read much on this site you're contributing too. How does my contribution to the page even remotely link to this guy you're talking about, exactly? It's pretty obvious that the Occupy Wall Street movement is an for awareness and promoting often socialist policies. All of the sources in the article that you guys and other contributors referenced totally give everyone that impression; thus, shall be introduced in the infobox. What's the deal? Maria Barzini (talk) 03:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Previous socks have used proxies, making this Inconclusive. I will say though that this account does not appear to be using an open proxy. Tiptoety talk 04:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)