Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* {{checkuser|1=Windlake}} |
* {{checkuser|1=Windlake}} |
||
* {{checkuser|1=Gasp2009}} |
* {{checkuser|1=Gasp2009}} |
||
* {{checkuser|1=Toddst1}} |
|||
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> |
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> |
||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
Same similar edits being made again, including random serial deprodding with the exact same types of edit summaries used to the previously-blocked socks as well as other similar minor edits also employed by said socks. The username "Mardaloop" refers to [[Marda Loop, Calgary]] (most of the suspected/confirmed socks originate from Calgary). [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 22:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
Same similar edits being made again, including random serial deprodding with the exact same types of edit summaries used to the previously-blocked socks as well as other similar minor edits also employed by said socks. The username "Mardaloop" refers to [[Marda Loop, Calgary]] (most of the suspected/confirmed socks originate from Calgary). [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 22:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I will also add that these accounts fit the modus operandi of the other socks as the first two users both deprod articles on the last day before it expires. [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 23:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
:I will also add that these accounts fit the modus operandi of the other socks as the first two users both deprod articles on the last day before it expires. [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 23:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
'Evidence submitted by Gasp2009 |
|||
Note that Toddst1 looks suspiciously like Gasp2009 and a checkuser will probably show a link. [[User:Gasp2009|Gasp2009]] ([[User talk:Gasp2009|talk]]) 05:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
;Comments by accused parties <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
;Comments by accused parties <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
Revision as of 05:58, 28 July 2009
Azviz
- Azviz (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date July 27 2009, 22:28 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Mardaloop (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Windlake (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Gasp2009 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Toddst1 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by MuZemike
Same similar edits being made again, including random serial deprodding with the exact same types of edit summaries used to the previously-blocked socks as well as other similar minor edits also employed by said socks. The username "Mardaloop" refers to Marda Loop, Calgary (most of the suspected/confirmed socks originate from Calgary). MuZemike 22:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- I will also add that these accounts fit the modus operandi of the other socks as the first two users both deprod articles on the last day before it expires. MuZemike 23:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
'Evidence submitted by Gasp2009 Note that Toddst1 looks suspiciously like Gasp2009 and a checkuser will probably show a link. Gasp2009 (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
Please do not invade my privacy. I was ...hernandez but it just got too heated so I quit using that and am using Gasp2009. Satisfied? Checkuser, please remove my name from this. Also note that MuZemike says the socks deprod articles. I have never proded or deproded an article because I don't even know what a deprod is (castration???).
Better yet, checkuser, be an ethical person and run a limited checkuser to show that I am not in Canada (MuZemike says the socks are coming from Calgary, in Canada) then destroy your information because looking me up is an invasion of privacy. Also consider running a checkuser on MuZemike and Abductive who could be socks of other people. After all, it takes a thief to know one. Better yet, I will paypal you, the checkuser $100 if I am Windlake or Marmaloop or you will paypal me $100 if I am not.
Please also see Wikipedia policy which states "It(checkuser) will not be used without good cause, which you must clearly demonstrate." The complainer has failed to show where I deprodded articles or wrote in cahoots with the other users. The complainer is being disruptive and disruption is a reason for them to be blocked. I came today to write an article about scallops but now I am fed up! Gasp2009 (talk) 05:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by other users
User:Gasp2009 contacted me and essentially admitted being a sock. He seems to be trying for some sort of rapprochement, although his methods have become ...unsound. Abductive (talk) 22:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by MuZemike 22:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Along with confirming via technical plus behavioral evidence, there are likely other socks in this farm as they have kept coming out consistently within the past three or four months. MuZemike 00:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions