AndyTheGrump (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=yes <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above...' |
49.148.218.205 (talk) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
:I just wikibreak says goodbye I been return from editor because still was able to October 2015 I don't think it is happened please don't block it [[Special:Contributions/49.148.218.205|49.148.218.205]] ([[User talk:49.148.218.205|talk]]) 11:25, 10 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 11:25, 10 July 2015
Angelo6397
- Angelo6397 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
10 July 2015
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Oripaypaykim (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
These two contributors came to my attention in regard to an egregious WP:BLP violation in the Andrea Brillantes article - tag-teaming to include badly-sourced sexually-explicit gossip about a 12-year-old child actor. As the article history shows, Angelo6397 initially added the (now revdelled) material at 07:27, 10 July, an IP removed it a couple of minutes later, and Oripaypaykim restored it at 07:31. Four minutes after it had first been added. While it might be possible that Oripaypaykim had the article watchlisted, the almost immediate revert seems suspicious - more so when it is also noted that Oripaypaykim went on to edit one of Angelo6397's posts shortly afterwards. [1] AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:23, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- I just wikibreak says goodbye I been return from editor because still was able to October 2015 I don't think it is happened please don't block it 49.148.218.205 (talk) 11:25, 10 July 2015 (UTC)