Content deleted Content added
move user's comment |
→Comments by other users: comment |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:OccultZone's socks have a complicated history of being found and unfound irregularly. There needs to be a behavioural evaluation. Especially with such strong evidence which is quite conclusive. [[User:Obaid Raza|Obaid Raza]] ([[User talk:Obaid Raza|talk]]) 13:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC) |
:OccultZone's socks have a complicated history of being found and unfound irregularly. There needs to be a behavioural evaluation. Especially with such strong evidence which is quite conclusive. [[User:Obaid Raza|Obaid Raza]] ([[User talk:Obaid Raza|talk]]) 13:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
*{{ping|Bbb23}} having interacted with each of these named editors over the years, I would conclude that this SPI is senseless and retaliatory. If you want to check any account that recently edited then you may consider checking [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ekvastra Ekvastra] who was blocked by you as a sock of AmritasyaPutra. {{U|OccultZone}} is also an active editor but he is unrelated to AmritasyaPutra (per Arbcom) and {{U|Sdmarathe}} (per CU). --[[User:RaviC|RaviC]] ([[User talk:RaviC|talk]]) 00:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
Revision as of 00:35, 9 July 2018
AmritasyaPutra
- AmritasyaPutra (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AmritasyaPutra/Archive.
07 July 2018
Suspected sockpuppets
- Sdmarathe (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- AmritasyaPutra created Sdmarathe's userpage.[1]. Till now no one else has edited that userpage. Interesting when we consider these things:
- The date the two accounts were created are not too far apart either, both near last few months of 2008.[2][3]
- What is even more interesting is that Sdmarathe's first edit was on 19 October 2014,[4] even though his account was created 6 years earlier,[5] around a similar time as AmritasyaPutra,[6] and that first edit was near the date of AmritasyaPutra's second block on 13 October 2014, which lasted 72 hours.[7]
- AmritasyaPutra's last activity was to strongly oppose nomination of Vanamonde93 for adminship.[8]
- The editing overlap is quite large.[11] Truth be told, these two have the same POV everywhere they overlap. A few examples follow:
- Similar/identical edit summaries and POV on Godhra train burning
- Sdmarathe: exact statement in source " In fact, the total number of casualties was most certainly over 2,000 dead". [12] [13] [14]
- AmritasyaPutra: As per source,the source says: "In fact, the total number of casualties was most certainly over 2,000 dead." [15]
- Actually, these two were the only users edit warring in 2014 over that specific content.[16]
- These two are on the same side in their dispute with Thinkmaths [17]
- They are the only two to agree with each other here.[18]
- On Talk: Battle of Chawinda, both Sdmarathe[19] and AmritasyaPuta[20] refer to themselves as "we" and attempt to oust mention of Pakistani victory. Till now both had little input on the talk page, yet the "we" is quite confidently stated.
- Similar/identical edit summaries and POV on Godhra train burning
The editor interaction utility shows these two supporting each other whenever they cross over. What is most suspicious is that often these users are the only ones supporting each other in edit wars and content disputes. That can’t be a coincidence, particularly when the rest of their behaviour is so close. This is a clear case of WP:DUCK. Obaid Raza (talk) 04:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- OccultZone's socks have a complicated history of being found and unfound irregularly. There needs to be a behavioural evaluation. Especially with such strong evidence which is quite conclusive. Obaid Raza (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: having interacted with each of these named editors over the years, I would conclude that this SPI is senseless and retaliatory. If you want to check any account that recently edited then you may consider checking Ekvastra who was blocked by you as a sock of AmritasyaPutra. OccultZone is also an active editor but he is unrelated to AmritasyaPutra (per Arbcom) and Sdmarathe (per CU). --RaviC (talk) 00:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OccultZone/Archive where AmritasyaPutra was confirmed to OZ and Sdmarathe was found to be unrelated.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)