WeatherWriter (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!--If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above this comment to checkuser=yes --> <!-- Sock 1 below --> |1= 2600:1017:B40E:BA6D:19E9:1AAE:91A2:B0CC <!-- Sock 2 if needed --> |2= <!-- Et cetera --> |3= |4= |5= |6= |7= |8= |9= |10= |11= |12= |13= |14= |15= |16= |17= |18= |19= |20= <!-- Add more if needed, including the number and equal sign --> <!-- Enter your evidence below. You do not need to sign it - it...' |
Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===03 April 2022=== |
===03 April 2022=== |
||
{{SPI case status|}} |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1=2600:1017:B40E:BA6D:19E9:1AAE:91A2:B0CC|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
{{sock list|1=2600:1017:B40E:BA6D:19E9:1AAE:91A2:B0CC|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*The use of multiple IP addresses is not prohibited unless the user intends to mislead editors into thinking they are multiple people. Since I don't see evidence of that intent here, I am closing this case without action. [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 03:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 03:50, 3 April 2022
72.229.242.36
- 72.229.242.36 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
03 April 2022
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
All occurred around the Battle of Chernobyl. my first change, first revert by 72, my first revert, second revert by 72, my second revert, edit by 72 on different talk page over the dispute (Noting at this time 72 makes no other edits and you will note their edit attempts to add "Chernobyl" into the middle of a discussion that was previously not considering it.) first revert by 2600 (and first edit on Wikipedia), my third revert , second revert by 2600. Key edits by 72 and 2600, both explaining the same thing, it was "for nothing" (72) and was "pointless" (2600). Also knowing how 72 made no more edits, but this editor makes their first edit right in the middle of the content dispute is suspicious behavior. Elijahandskip (talk) 02:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- The use of multiple IP addresses is not prohibited unless the user intends to mislead editors into thinking they are multiple people. Since I don't see evidence of that intent here, I am closing this case without action. Mz7 (talk) 03:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)