HelloAnnyong (talk | contribs) Comment, marking case as closed |
94.196.201.70 (talk) Just to point out that Mathsci's comments are quite false. |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
* Just to point out that Mathsci's comments are quite false. In particular, my edits to the article were entirely constructive, and indeed consisted mainly of correcting his obvious errors. My comments on the talk page, which he improperly deleted contrary to guidelines rather than addressing, were entirely sensible. Mathsci may not like "his" articles being criticised, but I suggest that the venom of his reaction is an implicit acknowledgement that the critique was justified. Sad really -- Mathsci wouild be a much better controbutor to the project if he could work constructively with his peers. [[Special:Contributions/94.196.201.70|94.196.201.70]] ([[User talk:94.196.201.70|talk]]) 07:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:18, 20 December 2011
Echigo mole
- Echigo mole (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
19 December 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
This seems to be classic A.K.Nole / Echigo mole editing, with trolling on a mathematics article where he barely understands the syntax. This user has a history of following my edits to speciailized articles like this one. They have been blocked on previous occasions for trolling on mathematics articles (Julian Birdbath, was one of the last cases; one of the first cases involved A.K.Nole on Butcher group). The new IPs are almost certainly explained by Xmas vacation. If the range cannot be blocked, please at least could the article page (Grunsky matrix) be semiprotected? Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 22:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- I did see threembb.co.uk listed as a proxy server on one list of UK proxy servers. Mathsci (talk) 23:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Just to point out that Mathsci's comments are quite false. In particular, my edits to the article were entirely constructive, and indeed consisted mainly of correcting his obvious errors. My comments on the talk page, which he improperly deleted contrary to guidelines rather than addressing, were entirely sensible. Mathsci may not like "his" articles being criticised, but I suggest that the venom of his reaction is an implicit acknowledgement that the critique was justified. Sad really -- Mathsci wouild be a much better controbutor to the project if he could work constructively with his peers. 94.196.201.70 (talk) 07:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note I've protected Grunsky matrix for 3 days. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 04:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)