Joe Doe
- Joe Doe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. Sources in the article aren't enough for notability. A Nominator (talk) 02:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I wrote this article. Passes WP:CREATIVE with the reliable sources I used in the article. Voter1 (talk) 03:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Voter2 (talk) 05:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of notability. 'nuf said. Voter3 (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Voter1's links seem to establish notability and pass WP:GNG because they have in-depth information about Doe. Voter4 (talk) 03:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: Waste of time nominating, should have been speedied. Notability just isn't asserted—he's really not that special. Voter5 (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. seriously? theres no question this should be deleted. suggest SNOW closure Voter6 (talk) 15:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that Doe's simply not notable. He hasn't done anything remarkable IMO, so shouldn't have an article here. Voter7 (talk) 1:00, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Joe Doe
Joe Doe is a scientist best known for developing the Hagea Theory.[1] In 1998, after conducting a series of experiments, Doe came to the realization that _ must be _. His colleagues dismissed his theory as implausible, and Doe acquiesced to their requests not to waste more time trying to verify the theory. Recently, in 2010, scientists have revisited and reevaluated Doe's Hagea Theory, finding that it is indeed an accurate assessment.[2]
- References
- ^ Full-length article from The Guardian: Hagea Theory: Coined by Joe Doe in 1998 but rejected. Now being revisited by scientists
- ^ Full-length article from The Daily Telegraph: Major scientific breakthrough: Experts say Joe Doe's Hagea Theory is veritable