Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.
This page is only for requesting undeletion of pages and files which have already been deleted. If the page you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.
Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.
- Instructions for special cases
- Speedy-deleted pages - see WP:CSDRFU
- G13. Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.
- For JavaScript .js or .css pages, please request on the Wikipedia:Interface administrators' noticeboard.
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
William Way LGBT Community Center
Harveymilk (talk) 22:01, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- William Way LGBT Community Center · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
I am unclear why William Way LGBT Community Center of Philadelphia, one of dozens of LGBT Centers nationwide, was chosen for deletion when many other LGBT centers remain undeleted (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LGBT_community_centers_in_the_United_States.) I am happy to work to improve the page, including addressing notability, but I don't see why the Philadelphia Center, one of the largest in the US, was targeted for deletion. The William Way is an important center both in local and regional LGBT history, and is one of the oldest LGBT centers too. Many thanks for any feedback you can offer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harveymilk (talk • contribs) 21:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- Article "X" does not justify the existence of Article "Y". —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 22:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done We could say it was deleted because people with your opinion did not contribute at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Way LGBT Community Center. It was a reversible softdelete. Anyway this is your chance to improve the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:46, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Graeme Bartlett. Happy to share a surname with you! I'll get to work on improving it. Many thanks. Harveymilk (talk) 16:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Ellen Carey
- Draft:Ellen Carey · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, ThatMontrealIP, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- I noticed this draft when I published Ellen Carey. I am thinking there might be some usable material in there. She is notable per point 4 of WP:ARTIST: work held in multiple museum collections.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:23, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Nothing much of value there (and no reliable sources either) so feel free to re-delete.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Nothing much of value there (and no reliable sources either) so feel free to re-delete.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Luieville
I want to improve the page (Ziggy 2milli (talk) 08:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC))"Publish changes" button below —Ziggy 2milli (talk) 08:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luieville, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, King of Hearts (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:48, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
I need the draft please (Ziggy 2milli (talk) 07:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC))
- Any and all of the draft's revisions are on the deleted article - which you put into article space, triggering the AfD. The only revisions under the draft are going to be the redirect left behind from when you moved it, and G6 is not a type of speedy that will be undeleted here. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 19:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Trident Society
- Trident Society · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Notable and relevant part of Duke University —2606:A000:1117:C2E4:ED3A:1428:91E0:B66F (talk) 04:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
I have referred to a reference on Apr 08 2019.
- Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and Farah Visit to West Germany · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I have made a reference on Apr 08 2019 —M.samei (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC) M.samei (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- A single reference isn't enough for notability as Wikipedia defines it. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 18:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps content could be added to Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Ritu Malhotra
- Draft:Ritu Malhotra · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Hatwarmithilesh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hatwarmithilesh (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
- @Hatwarmithilesh: Please continue to work on the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Rashays
- Draft:Rashays · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —103.31.114.34 (talk) 07:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Raimond Kaljulaid
- Raimond Kaljulaid · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Please undelete page, from aprill 2019 Raimond Kaljulaid is the member of the Estonian parliament. At the elections for the Estonian parliament he received 7303 voices —Jelena Kobanova (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- He is now a member of the Estonian Parliament, most recently in the news because he has quit the Centre Party with which he was long associated, and has announced that he will also be running for a seat in the European Parliament.[1] --Orange Mike | Talk 18:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
References
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
- @Jelena Kobanova and Orangemike: Please make sure the restored article is updated with the new information. —C.Fred (talk) 20:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Paul Castro Jr
- Draft:Paul Castro Jr · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Lunasasukeaeris, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lunasasukeaeris (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Franz Schall.jpg
- File:Franz Schall.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when Franz Schall was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Giga Herbs
- Draft:Giga Herbs · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Frogman2099, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Frogman2099 (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Which version, the 2017 version or the 2019 version? —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 18:56, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. both restored, look in history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Unramified extension
- Draft:Unramified extension · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
G13 (the draft is still needed as the topic is not covered in mainspace as far as I know. —Taku (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Anatoli Markovich Gurevich
- Draft:Anatoli Markovich Gurevich · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I have started to writing a new article on the same dude at Anatoly Gurevich. I was really surprised that a draft was available and only G13 about a month ago. It might be useful in terms of sources to restore the draft and so I determine if I can use any of the sources in the draft, if they are available. If really rubbish it go back in the bin. Thanks. —scope_creepTalk 21:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Graeme Bartlett: How are you. That article is some nick. No wonder it got g13'd. I've taken a couple of sources off it that may helpful and some notes that I can use to I build my own article, but most of it is junk and unreferenced. I cant do anything with it really, without finding a whole bunch of sources, which I plan do with my own article anyway, so there is no point in keeping it. I guess you just can delete it. Thanks for bringing is back from the dead for a wee while. scope_creepTalk 23:43, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hojat Rahimi
- Hojat Rahimi · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —BDBBA (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not doing at this point despite softdelete pending SPI investigation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Regina Lewis-Ward
- Regina Lewis-Ward · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Brookline1 (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please make the text available for update.
- Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 00:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- No. Just like the last time you asked. What is your connection to the article subject? —Cryptic 00:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Mitu Bhowmick Lange
- Mitu Bhowmick Lange · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —49.176.7.103 (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2019 (UTC) Hi there
I would like to have Mitu Bhowmick Lange's page reinstated. I have attached some information about her. Can you please advise if this is possible?
Thanks so much
- Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Considering that the AfD debate was plagued by sockpuppets and that this is an IP who's linking to the subject's website requesting it... —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 03:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitu Bhowmick Lange, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
User:Chinar_Tree
- User:Chinar_Tree · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I want to back my User Page which i had earlier requested for deletion —Chinar (Message | Contribs) 02:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC) Chinar (Message | Contribs) 02:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:ROD's Razor
- Draft:ROD's Razor · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Rodsrazor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rodsrazor (talk) 03:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that this topic does not appear to be suitable as no one else has written about it! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium
- Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I believe it can meet WP criteria for notability —Youllneverwalkalone2019 (talk) 06:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See User:Youllneverwalkalone2019/sandbox. Next time don't give up and request delete yourself! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
User:Adam4cSports/sandbox
- User:Adam4cSports/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Adam4cSports, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adam4cSports (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Al Siesta
- Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Adam4cSports (talk) 10:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done there is no such page, but hopefully your sandbox is what you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:IOS7_Game_Centre_logo.png
- File:IOS7_Game_Centre_logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
File was deleted as F5 'Unused non-free media file' due to vandalism on the Game Center page. —Ngyikp (talk) 10:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:G Sharp (Programming Language)
- Draft:G Sharp (Programming Language) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, TheMechatronicist, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheMechatronicist (talk) 15:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Fabian Waintal
- Fabian Waintal · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Incorrect deletion, please restore to my userspace —Atlantic306 (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. not userfied. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Tim Girvin
- Tim Girvin · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Article was deleted due to being "self promotional" was not written by Tim Girvin nor anyone who worked with him. Would like to review the article to establish what was self promotional and change.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.210.187.204 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Just Chilling (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 20:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- The article has been edited by many different people, but has been promotional ever since its creation more than one and a half decades ago. I suggest that you ask user:Just Chilling to put this into a draft, as the topic looks to be notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have restored at Draft:Tim Girvin. I have also restored the talk page which has useful discussion. This page is so promotional that it cannot remain here, in its present state, for long so, if it can't be fixed promptly, I suggest that it is copied to the applicant's own device. Just Chilling (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
File:BurghRecords Logo.png
- File:BurghRecords Logo.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Copyright holder has emailed the OTRS team to release the logo under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License, OTRS ticket number regarding the request is 2019040110008395 —Clarkcj12 (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- In that case we await OTRS team to confirm this is proven. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
637 Portal subpages
Automated portals are being deleted en masse per recent MfD discussions (for an example, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mass-created portals based on a single navbox, where 1,390 automated portals with no previous, non-automated versions in their Revision histories are nominated for deletion in a bundled nomination). Upon examining the Revision histories of other portals, outside of those listed for deletion in this example discussion, many have manually-created, pre-automated versions that cull information from portal subpages. Unfortunately, many of these subpages were hastily nominated for speedy deletion without allowing enough time to see how the community would respond to the mass conversion of portals to automated versions. The community has demonstrated a strong, noticeable dislike for automated portals, so it makes sense to begin the process of reverting to previous, non-automated versions at this time. Requesting restoration of the following portal subpages that were deleted per WP:G6 housekeeping, to enable the reversion of portals converted to automation back to their pre-automated versions. North America1000 08:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- If they're sufficiently uncontroversial to list at WP:REFUND, they're sufficiently uncontroversial that you can restore them yourself. —Cryptic 09:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Cryptic: Yeah, I thought about that, but after this recent unfortunate turn of events, where I had to spend lots of my time defending myself against misguided accusations, which ultimately led to the thread against me being closed as baseless, I feel that it would be best if an uninvolved admin performed the task. It is not worth it to me to risk another round at ANI for having done absolutely nothing wrong, a complete time sink that took lots of time away from functional activities. Since I was mischaracterized as a "strong portal advocate" in the beginning of the thread (I'm actually rather neutral, not that it should matter; I have opined for deletion of many portals; read the ani if you'd like for more information, but yeah, I like some portals and their use), someone could just read the first part of the thread where it says "strong portal advocate", ignore the rest, go along with the typecasting, make a snap judgment, and then complain that self-performed refunds are "disruptive". If this were to occur, and I pointed to your comment here, people could just disagree for whatever reason(s), say it's controversial, and that it's therefore a disruption. Yup, welcome to Wikipedia. Hope you understand. North America1000 10:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please DO NOT do this undeletion as listed: several of the portal subpages listed above are subpages to portals that no longer exist, so this REFUND as listed will only create more work for editors. No opposition to REFUNDing of a properly researched list. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Well, there's complaint #1. UnitedStatesian: could you provide a list of portals that have been deleted? Then, I could remove them from the list. I'm already quite busy working on restoring portals that have not been deleted, which is very time consuming. I'm only one person, and one person can only do so much. This isn't against you at all, but as a general observation, this is what happens when people get all excited about overly WP:EAGER deletion; the present MfD crusade is now literally preventing portals that have not been deleted from being significantly improved. It's ass backwards. North America1000 11:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- As a non-admin, I don't have such a list. Sorry. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I feel that it would do no harm to the encyclopedia for some portal subpages that don't have an accompanying portal to be restored at this time. They can be weeded out as the restoration process occurs. Conversely, it significantly harms the encyclopedia to prevent significant improvements from occurring per rash actions of G6 being requested too soon and rash actions at MfD where people may not be researching matters adequately, with many just saying "delete all per nom, portals are no good", and such. People should slow down on the deletion frenzy. North America1000 12:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I've added links to the parent pages; there's only about fifteen that are red. I'll restore the rest of the subpages later today when I have more time, if nobody beats me to it. —Cryptic 12:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for your assistance, it is truly appreciated. North America1000 12:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- As a non-admin, I don't have such a list. Sorry. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Well, there's complaint #1. UnitedStatesian: could you provide a list of portals that have been deleted? Then, I could remove them from the list. I'm already quite busy working on restoring portals that have not been deleted, which is very time consuming. I'm only one person, and one person can only do so much. This isn't against you at all, but as a general observation, this is what happens when people get all excited about overly WP:EAGER deletion; the present MfD crusade is now literally preventing portals that have not been deleted from being significantly improved. It's ass backwards. North America1000 11:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please DO NOT do this undeletion as listed: several of the portal subpages listed above are subpages to portals that no longer exist, so this REFUND as listed will only create more work for editors. No opposition to REFUNDing of a properly researched list. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Cryptic: Yeah, I thought about that, but after this recent unfortunate turn of events, where I had to spend lots of my time defending myself against misguided accusations, which ultimately led to the thread against me being closed as baseless, I feel that it would be best if an uninvolved admin performed the task. It is not worth it to me to risk another round at ANI for having done absolutely nothing wrong, a complete time sink that took lots of time away from functional activities. Since I was mischaracterized as a "strong portal advocate" in the beginning of the thread (I'm actually rather neutral, not that it should matter; I have opined for deletion of many portals; read the ani if you'd like for more information, but yeah, I like some portals and their use), someone could just read the first part of the thread where it says "strong portal advocate", ignore the rest, go along with the typecasting, make a snap judgment, and then complain that self-performed refunds are "disruptive". If this were to occur, and I pointed to your comment here, people could just disagree for whatever reason(s), say it's controversial, and that it's therefore a disruption. Yup, welcome to Wikipedia. Hope you understand. North America1000 10:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Landore High Level railway station
- Landore High Level railway station · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I am going to rewrite this article, and would like to see what existed before —welsh (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- It was only ever a redirect to Landore railway station, which never existed. —Cryptic 13:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
User:Dreamy Jazz/wikibreak and others
- User:Dreamy Jazz/wikibreak · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- User:Dreamy Jazz/Draftify log · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- User:Dreamy Jazz/PROD log · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- User:Dreamy Jazz/thingscreated · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- User:Dreamy Jazz/sandbox · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- User:Dreamy Jazz/common.js · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- User:Dreamy Jazz/common.css · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Requesting undeletion of user requested deleted pages —Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 12:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Did the first five. You'll have to ask a higher power for the other two. —Cryptic 13:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Colombia
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Colombia · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Victoria (Australia) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Panama · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Chile · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Jamaica · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Costa Rica · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Trinidad and Tobago · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Please ping me when you're through. Abyssal (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done @Abyssal: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
The McClure Twins
- Draft:The McClure Twins · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, LaWr123, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LaWr123 (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
FairBnB
I would like this article (which was deleted through the Proposed Deletion system) to be undeleted and then moved to either Draft:FairBnB or User:Gerrit/FairBnB, so I can continue working on it and/or request it to be moved back to Article namespace if the organisation grows and it is no longer WP:TOOSOON (after adding articles that are not only about its launch). —Gerrit CUTEDH 15:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done @Gerrit: see User:Gerrit/FairBnB. Hut 8.5 21:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
SEBASTIAN JUDE
- Sebastian Jude · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
ADVERSE EFFECTS, ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY PROFESSIONAL —2600:1700:F9C0:6880:E0D2:5BF:76A:CB95 (talk) 16:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- If the PROD is overturned, I will take it to AfD. A Google News search turns up absolutely nothing useful. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 20:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. And I've nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Jude. Hut 8.5 21:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Estamos Bien
- Estamos Bien · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
though the page was created by a banned user, I think the page history will be useful —Jax 0677 (talk) 19:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- I suggest that you consult with User:CactusWriter to see if this is restorable or if there are likely serious problems. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @CactusWriter:, can you please restore the history for "Estamos Bien"? --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677: -- No problem. The article with its full history has been restored for you at Draft:Estamos Bien. — CactusWriter (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @CactusWriter:, can you please restore the history for "Estamos Bien"? --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Steve & Bluey
- Draft:Steve & Bluey · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Writerone, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Writerone (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft: Gary Wales
- Draft:Gary Wales · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Have not made a edit for more than a year due to a busy schedule, I’m ready to make further edits —RomeZw (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
User talk:The Duke of Nonsense/Archive/2018/September
- User talk:The Duke of Nonsense/Archive/2018/September · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi there, I am requesting this to be undeleted so that people can see what I've done in the past, and so they can learn who sockpuppeting, and lying get you nowhere on this platform. Me trying to delete this was the wrong thing to do, as it seems like I'm trying to hide it, and I never want to do that. Thus, I am requesting for this to be undeleted. Thank you. —The Duke 23:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Articles for creation/Sonee Black
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sonee Black · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Kanosike, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kanosike (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Michael Waldrop (musician)
- Draft:Michael Waldrop (musician) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Shelyric, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shelyric (talk) 04:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Endeavour Media
- Draft:Endeavour Media · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 86.185.233.123, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.185.233.123 (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Dragonchain
- Dragonchain · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]
It was deleted by someone with a strong preference against Dragonchain. Like all other blockchains such as Ethereum, NEO, Dash, Monero, Bitcoin, I fully believe I should be able to visit that page and make improvements. I did not start, write or contribute to that page, but I would like to do so and prevent future deletion. If my request will be accepted. —JeffreyDutch (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonchain, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. We don't actually know the opinion of the one who deleted it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
That is true, we do not know the opinion of the one who deleted it. Thank you, I will try that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffreyDutch (talk • contribs) 13:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @JeffreyDutch: The deletion was per process in accordance with the AFD discussion. The participants in the discussion were unanimous in their support of deletion. Any personal views of the admin who deleted it are irrelevant in this context and they should not be pestered about it. – Athaenara ✉ 22:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Athaenara: Yes, I already agreed on that in my above comment and more than happy to apologize again. JeffreyDutch (talk) 10:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
RAMAKANT GAUR
- Draft:Ramakant Gaur · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Dixitssumit, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dixitssumit (talk) 12:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Cassius Vinicius Coelho
- Cassius Vinicius Coelho · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Player actually pass WP:NFOOTY now, as he played in a WP:FPL. —MYS77 ✉ 16:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ping User:Malcolmxl5 - any objection to this being moved to draft space? Hut 8.5 21:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hut 8.5. No objections. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done @MYS77: see Draft:Cassius Vinicius Coelho. Hut 8.5 06:48, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Edder Fuertes
- Edder Fuertes · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Player actually pass WP:NFOOTY now, as he played in a WP:FPL. —MYS77 ✉ 16:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. @MYS77: can you add some evidence that the subject meets NFOOTY? Hut 8.5 21:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Hut 8.5: According to WP:FPL, playing in the Ecuadorian Serie A makes him eligible through NFOOTY. Cheers, MYS77 ✉ 13:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Wesley Tavares dos Santos
- Wesley Tavares dos Santos · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Despite the page was an unsourced BLP, the player passed WP:NFOOTY and will be improved after the restore. —MYS77 ✉ 16:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done @MYS77: I've moved this to Draft:Wesley Tavares dos Santos for improvement. It wasn't technically a valid BLP PROD because the article did cite a source when it was tagged, but I still think it would be best to improve it before moving back to mainspace. Hut 8.5 21:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
sezzle
I, 65.126.92.250, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 65.126.92.250 (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Which page are you talking about? Neither Sezzle nor Draft:Sezzle has ever existed, you don't have any deleted contributions, and there don't appear to be any deleted pages containing "sezzle" in the title. Hut 8.5 21:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Triangle Factory
- Draft:Triangle Factory · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, VindevogelTaho, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VindevogelTaho (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- It was actually deleted for advertising, not G13, so you should consult with the deleter User talk:Anthony Appleyard. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:List of video games developed in Romania
- Draft:List of video games developed in Romania · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, ZarnotRO, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ZarnotRO (talk) 09:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
File:University of London.svg
- File:University of London.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Deleted under the f7 criteria, but I'm not exactly sure why. No mention on the talk page previously. if the problem was an incorrect fair use rationale then surely that could be fixed. —Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion F7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- The specific rationale for deletion was "Criterion 3a, because multiple non-free images (including File:University of London logo.svg) are being used when one would suffice." —Cryptic 05:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Operating Systems Design and Implementation
- Operating Systems Design and Implementation · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
- USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Article is a sister article to SOSP, and most certainly does not qualify for speedy deletion; http://web.archive.org/web/20120717150516/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USENIX_Symposium_on_Operating_Systems_Design_and_Implementation indicates it already has had all the notability references, and there are many other articles on wikipedia that use OSDI publications as references, e.g., Special:Search/Google OSDI alone returns 11 results, none of which is a false-positive (due to a random related term that limits the search greatly). —MureninC (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Also, wouldn't hurt to undelete USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation and Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, as per [1], as well, for completeness sake, and in case talk has something useful. MureninC (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Only the first was an article when deleted, the others were redirects. You can ask user talk:RHaworth to revert the speedy delete, as this administrator who deleted the page is still active. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Are you saying you don't suggest that the history on the redirects is restored as well? I'd prefer to have it all properly restored with original data and dates instead of being re-created anew. Is there a policy for this either way? As for contacting the administrator who erroneously speed-deleted the page, this has already been done at least once a couple years ago, and instead of fixing their mistake, they decided to make fun of the requester; see Special:Permalink/781071611#OSDI page recreation. MureninC (talk) 23:24, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Rajiv Mishra
- Rajiv Mishra · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Rajiv Mishra is a well known journalist of India,
A well known hosehold name with over 1000 published article in main stream news paper, over 100 interview show in India's leading TV channels. —122.162.105.187 (talk) 08:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Mishra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:ICON Creative Studio
- Draft:ICON Creative Studio · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, CLoveday87, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CLoveday87 (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done Since your work was deleted as a copyright infringement, you must start again without copying other works. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Marlon du Toit
- Marlon du Toit · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Requesting undelete, as I intend to work on the article further. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 18:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon du Toit, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Heather Bentley
- Draft:Heather Bentley · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Trebacze, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Trebacze (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Spain
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Spain · ( talk | logs | links | watch | mfd ) · [revisions]
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 00:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
File:LeeDaehwi MAMAHK2018.jpg
- File:LeeDaehwi MAMAHK2018.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
It was mistaken to be the work of LOVEOLOGIST, But in fact it is the work of YOHINUNA. I'm asking for undeletion because the reason the reviewer left was not TRUE, Patrick Rogel mistaken the pics' source for LOVEOLOGIST's work when in fact it's YOHINUNA's work and i have added the reference correctly too. —Otterlyhwi (talk) 03:16, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done – This file was deleted on Commons. Otterlyhwi, you will need to make your case to the deleting administrator or at the undeletion requests page there. ℯxplicit 03:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Italy
- Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Italy · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 12:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Mansha Bahl
- Draft:Mansha Bahl · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Abhi1012, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abhi1012 (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Conglomerate (set theory)
- Conglomerate (set theory) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
I object PROD deletion. The article had a reliable source. The concern "The authors don't define it as an object in a known axiomatic first order theory" is not a valid reason for deletion. —Alexei Kopylov (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- The source that @Alexei Kopylov: speaks about is reliable in the field of category theory, not in set theory, and not in foundations of mathematics, as it should be in this article. As I told to Alexey Kopylov many times, there must be serious reasons for making declarations like this
and citing authors who make declarations like thisМожно пойти дальше и рассматривать совокупности классов — конгломераты, совокупности конгломератов и так далее. (One can go further and consider sets of classes — conglomerates, sets of conglomerates, and so on.)
Eozhik (talk) 16:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Математика была вынуждена бесповоротно отказаться от претензий на абсолютную достоверность или значимость своих результатов. (Mathematics had to irrecoverably abandon claims for absolute certainty or significance of its results.)
- The source that @Alexei Kopylov: speaks about is reliable in the field of category theory, not in set theory, and not in foundations of mathematics, as it should be in this article. As I told to Alexey Kopylov many times, there must be serious reasons for making declarations like this
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Hustle & Soul
- Hustle & Soul · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
'Hustle & Soul' is a very well known reality show out here. I don't understand why it was deleted in the first place. This reality show needs a wikipedia page so that people know who they're watching and so they can keep up with the ratings.—77.173.134.237 (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- That isn't what Wikipedia is for. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 21:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not done The Hustle & Soul was deleted because the writer blanked the page. They never put in more than a broken infobox, so there was nothing usable to restore. Others are welcome to write on the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Laura Crafton Gilpin
- Laura Crafton Gilpin · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I do not understand why a bio page of a poet and nurse was deleted, especially since she is being widely confused with Laura Gilpin, the photographer (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Gilpin) on various well-known websites including goodreads. —Jvanala (talk) 20:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note:
The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. If the deletion reason was R2, add "Draft:" to the start of your article's title.It was draftified, not deleted. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 21:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- See Draft:Laura Crafton Gilpin Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Jalin Turner
- Jalin Turner · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Article was nominated for deletion last year (see deletion discussion here) and closed as delete since the subject failed WP:MMATIER. Recently Turner has fought in his third UFC fight at UFC 236 which satisfied WP:NMMA. See here for proof of that. Closing admin was contacted but they recommended to come here. Inter&anthro (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC) —Inter&anthro (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know why they would recommend coming here, unless their intent is to see the page draftified... —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 23:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jéské Couriano: see here. It's no big deal, I can start the article myself. Inter&anthro (talk) 23:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Herlinde_Koelbl
- Draft:Herlinde_Koelbl · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Media-hk, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Media-hk (talk) 08:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Sanjay Razdan
- Sanjay Razdan · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]
Subject is notable. Also deletion process was not followed correctly and no vote or reason for deletion was given. —2600:1700:7BB0:950:2C4C:D40C:9E1C:43EF (talk) 10:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Pace Analytical
- Draft:Pace Analytical · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Parker24 22, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Parker24 22 (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Johan Alfred Rinell
- Johan Alfred Rinell · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Contributor will continue working on the article and publish it. —Lennart Holmquist (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Arkansas/Projects
- Portal:Arkansas/Projects · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Deleted per WP:G6. This page is needed per the portal being restored to it's pre-automated version. Since I'm involved in working on the portal, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin. North America1000 17:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Eric Morse
- Draft:Eric Morse · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, W1nless, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. W1nless (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Swiss Draw in Ultimate Frisbee
- Draft:Swiss Draw in Ultimate Frisbee · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Cschff, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cschff (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Have a Heart Compassion Care · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —206.81.201.82 (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)