→The Vietnamization of New Jersey: new section |
|||
Line 351: | Line 351: | ||
<i></i>Neda Agha-Soltan was a real person and her death was just ONE aspect of her life. I request that the original Neda Agha-Soltan page be reinstated as most users will not search for "death of", furthermore, its been a year and people search for Neda, not her death, as she is now a symbolic historical figure -[[User:Wahica|Wahica]] ([[User talk:Wahica|talk]]) 17:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC) |
<i></i>Neda Agha-Soltan was a real person and her death was just ONE aspect of her life. I request that the original Neda Agha-Soltan page be reinstated as most users will not search for "death of", furthermore, its been a year and people search for Neda, not her death, as she is now a symbolic historical figure -[[User:Wahica|Wahica]] ([[User talk:Wahica|talk]]) 17:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
** This was redirected and merged after a community discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neda Agha-Soltan]]. You need to use the article talk page to get a consensus to move it back. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 18:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC) |
** This was redirected and merged after a community discussion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neda Agha-Soltan]]. You need to use the article talk page to get a consensus to move it back. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 18:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
== The Vietnamization of New Jersey == |
|||
*{{revisions| The Vietnamization of New Jersey}} |
|||
<i></i> I think the notability concerns can be addressed by including some of the reliable sources that discuss the play, including a 2007 ''New York Times'' review. I'll be happy to add these to the article if restored. -[[User:28bytes|28bytes]] ([[User talk:28bytes|talk]]) 23:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:14, 29 June 2010
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion and under certain speedy deletion criteria, such as CSD G6. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere. This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be undeleted through this process.
This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.
Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion, and you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
File:Coat of arms of Western Sahara.png
- File:Coat of arms of Western Sahara.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
not my original image, necessary to illustrate the article it is the subject of. I will find appropriate licensing, a rename may be necessary after upload, as there are concerns about status, however it should be restored before rename to preserve edit history -Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 06:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not doneThe image was deleted after a discussion and had no source information so its got not edit history that we can restore. Spartaz Humbug! 14:19, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Can you point me to the discussion? --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_July_15#File:Coat_of_arms_of_Western_Sahara.png Ug its a pain finding old FFD discussions, a properly linked archive would be really useful... Spartaz Humbug! 18:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Cool, thank you both, I use that trick every day for recent deletes, but I forgot. Sometimes I get distrac...hey, peanut butter!--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
list of foreigners in Japan December 1941
- List of foreigners in Japan December 1941 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
is it possible to undelete a file if don't remember its exact name? It has in it "list of foreigners in Japan December 1941", it was not my article but may have useful material, I dewatched it before I knew we could undelete, it was deleted about two years ago. Sorry I can't help more. Userfying is all I need, don't put it back to article space. -Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Kintetsubuffalo/List_of_foreign_residents_in_Japan_(December_1941). It was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign residents in Japan (December 1941) --Tikiwont (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Litera
I submitted the article last week and submitted it for feedback. A few users edited my article and then this morning one user tagged it for speedy deletion stating it was advertising. I'm new to Wiki and I deleted the speedy deletion template because I misunderstood the process; I added comments to the talk page and thought that was sufficient. I asked the user why they thought it was advertising because other users had reviewed the same article and didn't have that problem. I got a quick message back from a different user chastizing me for removing the deletion template and when I went back to fix it, my page had been deleted because it was deemed as advertising.
I thought the whole point of the talk page was to discuss things? Why offer that if the time elapsed between being tagged for deletion to actual deletion is less than one hour? How can I go about getting the page undeleted so I can at least attempt to fix the problem this one user saw? -Docexpert101 (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- If a tag has been tagged for speedy deletion, the original author should not delete the tag, which is why it was reverted & you were warned.
- If you feel the article should stay, you should place the {{hangon}} tag below the speedy tag and then explain on the talk page why you think the article should stay. Other editors will then usually reply, however the hangon tag does not automatically stop the article from being deleted. I sugged you red up on some of the policies on en.wiki.
- You can also look at starting articles on your own sandbox to get the article ready for mainspace without it being tagged for deletion. - Happysailor (Talk) 13:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I didn't get that I wasn't supposed to delete the template, so that was my fault. The template was put back on and I did the hangon and wrote on the talk page. Then it was deleted without any discussion. This whole thing happened in less than 15 minutes. I think the person who deleted it was mad that I took off the speedy deletion template, which was my fault but it was not done maliciously. My point is that multiple other users edited and reviewed it before this one person marked it for deletion. I think its worthwhile to point that out and makes a stronger case for my page than I can.
So how do I go about getting the page looked at again and undeleted? Docexpert101 (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Docexpert101/Litéra. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Athaenara (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines – articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Please note that the VAST MAJORITY of companies in existence do not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about corporations. If the content is advertising or if there is not significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, then the article is only going to be deleted again. Press releases do not count. Things like their list of partners are obviously not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. --B (talk) 14:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Shuzo Matsunaga
- Shuzo Matsunaga · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Thirukkural is the masterpiece of Tamil literature with the highest and purest expressions of human thought. It is written in the form of couplets (two line poems) expounding various aspects of life. Mr.Shuzo translated the tamil version of thirukkural to Japanese and published it as a book in japan and received a wide response among Japanese readers. Not limited to thirukkural, he also translated more tamil literature books to Japanese. I hope this explains the importance of having a page for him in Wikipedia. -61.12.17.170 (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Nevertheless, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuzo Matsunaga. --Tikiwont (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
swapmypix
I believe the entry we created for swapmypix is similar to other entries on wikipedia for other photo sharing sites like snapfish and flickr. We did not make any judgments on swapmypix or try to promote it as the best photo sharing site. We simply put what we know about the page. I am married to one of the owners and decided to create a page about his site. I would welcome others to contribute to the page and add whatever they know about the company and services they provide. If there are things that need to be removed or added, I would love to do so. Again, I do not believe the page I created was just trying to promote the site. It is there to give people more information about swapmypix and contribute any other knowledge they may have about the company and services. Please allow the page to be added back. Thank you. -Morajazzmo (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done – this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Also please note that the fact that you are married to the owner of the site gives you a conflict of interest. Your comment on creating it based on what you know leads me to believe that you did not cite sources. Unfortunately Wikipedia cannot accept articles that do not cite sources because we could no longer be able to check for verifiability. Please read WP:My first article to know more of the guidelines for creating an article. I would suggest getting more familiar with Wikipedia before requesting this article to be undeleted again Mr. R00t Talk 18:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
shephard dube
- Shephard dube · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
i do not understand why the article about this great young umpire can not be included in wikipedia, he is the world's youngest cricket umpire and he is from the previously disadvantage group. there for i think it is unreasonable for wikipedia to be including articles about ordinary cricket umpires but excluding this extra ordinary one. please restore this article because it is of great importance in the history of cricket. -41.114.162.9 (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- I suggest you read WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
the postelles
- The Postelles · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
It appears the page for The Postelles has been repeatedly deleted for lack of notability. The last delete log cites that the band merits a page, but that the article lacks proper content. I fully agree with the early deletions of the page, but it seems silly to keep this page locked at this point. The band is one of the only artists to have played Bonnaroo Music and Arts Festival that still lack an article. There are plenty of good sources for information on the band both print and online including Rolling Stone, Spin Magazine, and Billboard. -Wallen75 (talk) 19:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC) --Wallen75 (talk) 19:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Then create a draft at, say, User:Wallen75/The Postelles, using all those good sources; then ask somebody (maybe the blocking admin) to review it and move it into articlespace. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Du Kirpalani - please help
reasoning -Dukirpalani (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I was just informed that my article on wikipedia is about to be deleted. I don't understand why...
Everything that is up there has been added by friends, colleagues and family and everything is true and can be verified. I even have 2 of my credits on imdb. Not all producers in India are listed on imdb, so it's not possible to have all of them listed on imdb. I have been performing at the Comedy Store. I have a link on youtube. I have been performing at other places, but they don't allow recording. The tvwriter.com contest is listed on their website.
Please let me know what I must do. I depend on wikipedia to get new work and I don't look professional if my articles are subject to deletion. Not only employers, but lawyers check up on me.
Please, please get back to me as soon as you can and please, please don't delete my page. Everything is true.
Thanks and best, dushant kirpalani (aka du kirpalani)
- This page has not yet been deleted. Please see Proposed deletion of biographies of living people for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion of a biography of a living person. As of this moment right now, any user (including yourself) can remove the {{prod}} and it will not be deleted. However, unless reliable sources independent of the subject are found, it will be deleted at articles for deletion even if you remove the prod. I do not suggest pursuing it unless you have reliable sources to add. --B (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note-I am disturbed by "I depend on wikipedia to get new work"-then you totally miss the point of Wikipedia. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 14:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes - to post your CV for professional purposes you need a site like LinkedIn or Facebook, that is definitely not what Wikipedia is for. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Mount Ida (Davenport, Iowa)
- Mount Ida (Davenport, Iowa) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Please move this to User:Ctjf83/Mount Ida, so I can see if it is expandable. I originally created, and then requested speedy deletion, for it not being notable. -CTJF83 pride 20:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Done. I didn't bring the talk page, which only has a couple of Wikiproject notices on it; let me know if you want that. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Benny Darius
- Benny Darius · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Benny Darius is cool. -Wangchu (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Du Kirpalani
- Du Kirpalani · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Du is a hilarious stand up comedian who I have seen perform at least 3 times over a short course of time. His delivery and dry sense of humor has me excited to see him grow in this difficult industry. A diamond in the rough! -64.80.158.188 (talk) 21:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see Proposed deletion of biographies of living people for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion of a biography of a living person. As of this moment right now, any user (including yourself) can remove the {{prod}} and it will not be deleted. However, unless reliable sources independent of the subject are found, it will be deleted at articles for deletion even if you remove the prod. I do not suggest pursuing it unless you have reliable sources to add. --B (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
WebChat_Broadcasting_System
- WebChat_Broadcasting_System · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Illegitimate copyright violation -Tobias382 (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
This page was nominated for deletion due to an illegitimate copyright violation report. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tobias382#WBS_Article and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WebChat_Broadcasting_System for details. The page has since been recreated following the discovery of the copyvio report's illegitimacy, but I would like to have its full history restored.
- Done I'm mildly amused - the other document was obviously copied from Wikipedia right down to the [citation needed] template. --B (talk) 22:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Du Kirpalani
reasoning -64.80.158.188 (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I have seen Du Kirpalani perform numerous times at the Comedy Store in Hollywood. He is hilarious on stage. I make a living as a talent Manager and I think this guy certainly has "it". His writing is fantastic, such an interesting voice. I think his break into American television sitcom and comedy will come soon, only a matter of time before people catch on to this guy's talents!
Sincerely,
Tom Spriggs Talent Manager / Producer Elevate Entertainment
- Not done and will not be done Please quit adding this. For the third time, it hasn't been deleted yet. It will be deleted if you cannot find reliable sources external to the subject. --B (talk) 23:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Matix Group
- Matix Group · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
reasoning -Bhanukaran (talk) 06:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
The article will conform the requirements of necessary citations incorporated in the deleted version.
- Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matix Group. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 11:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Du Kirpalani
- Du Kirpalani · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
reasoning -123.237.37.147 (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
I was the executive producer on 'The Great Indian Comedy Show' and confirm that Du Kirpalani was the staff writer.
Thanks, Anuradha
- Not done - for the fourth time: this page is for requests about pages which have been deleted, but this article has not been deleted. There is a deletion debate taking place at WP:Articles for deletion/Du Kirpalani and your opinion is welcomed there; but note that the discussion is not a vote and it will not help to bring in friends and supporters: the question at issue is whether the article meets Wikipedia's requirement of notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - see also WP:ENTERTAINER. JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
ray fabi
This page has since been modified to include url links in the form of references at the bottom of the page. These links provide sufficient proof of the information contained in the page.-Rayfabi (talk) 13:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- You've been instructed several times on your talkpage that writing articles about yourself is a no-no. In the event you don't read your talkpage, You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. I also suggest reading what Chris wrote. --B (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
CheFEM
The deletion was motivated by lack of notability. Dr. Kate Stuart does not agree with this motivation. CheFEM is a new developed simulation program for service life predictions of polymer based materials. The fact that the program is rather new, and the possible lack of knowledge on highly specialistic chemical-physical simulation programs of the ones who deleted the page, might have causes this deletion. Sincerely, Kate -Kate P Stuart (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done The article was deleted via discussion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CheFEM). As such, any request to undelete the article should start with the closing administrator, Cirt (talk · contribs), and if necessary proceed to Deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 06:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Side note-It's weird when users refer to themselves as Dr. and speak of themselves in third-person. Dr. Chris would never do that. LOL --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 16:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Brothers in Arms; Lost Saints; Blacksheep
- Brothers in Arms; Lost Saints; Blacksheep · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This is a request for the deleted article to be emailed to the original editor. This article was created by LostSaint4LifeBIA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I deleted it under criterion A7, lack of notability. The user has requested an emailed copy of the article,[1] but I would like assistance from a neutral editor to email the article text. (Since emailing reveals the sender's email address, I'm selective about who I send an email to.) Thank you. -—C.Fred (talk) 06:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Done Minor aside: you may want to get a gmail or yahoo throwaway email address for Wikipedia. --B (talk) 14:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Patrick M. Stillman
- Patrick M. Stillman · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I'm willing to add sources today or tomorrow. -Scriberius (talk) 13:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Ivan Pack
The page Ivan pack was deleted because it was not notable. It was on the speedy deletion list and I would like to have it restored or at least sent to me so I can make the necessary changes to the article so it will be fixed. It was very important and notable because Ivan has many fans around the world and is a professional fighter. He just recently fought for the Heavyweight championship of the world. -Jeffthewrestler (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Jeffthewrestler/Ivan Pack. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Anthony.bradbury (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --B (talk) 12:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Anushka Wirasinha
- Anushka Wirasinha · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]
Malice and jealousy against a listed well known person should not be a cause for deletion of that person. Anushka Wirasinha is a very well known and highly respected IT author. Those who have asked that the article be deleted have no reasonable facts to warrant such a claim. They have not bothered to verify the details and have slandered without reason. There are facts to support this author that are more than enough to give her inclusion in Wikipedia. Anushka Wirasinha earned a BSc Economics degree from University of London. It can be verified from the University. Her foundation page has "CSS Harvard" which is the qualification she received. The Certificate of Special Studies is beyond grad level and it is awarded by Harvard. She also was an assistant lecturer in Micro Computers and Information Technology at Harvard and this also can be verified. She is a published author with Prentice Hall of India and this can be verified by them at www.phindia.com. Over 20 Universities have her books "Visually Learn PC, On Your Marks Net Set Go...Surviving in an eworld and Flash in a Flash: Web Development listed in their curriculum (please see the links on her foundation page). IMTA is the International and Modeling Talent Association where students from modeling schools are "selected" on talent basis to compete where she got "best smile". There is a fee to enter IMTA but from those who pay the fee you have to be selected and very few are selected. Please note that Katie Holmes was discovered at IMTA and please don't discredit such credible talent organizations. Sigma Xi membership is given after looking into many credits and she is a member and you can verify with them. She is also a Master Practitioner of NLP directly taught under Paul McKenna and Richard Bandler. Her books are in the Library of Congress copyright office and you can see through their online catalog. There are endless newspaper articles about her by genuine and reputable papers. Deletion of her from wikipedia should not have even come up. Given the facts and position outlined above I request the article be undeleted immediately. -Chamithra (talk) 06:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anushka Wirasinha. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Shimeru (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 12:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Transformice
wasn't reviewed. -Willpower101 (talk) 12:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- As I said to you in reply to your message on my talk page, if the article does not assert importance or significance, it gets deleted - the burden is on you to demonstrate that this is an appropriate topic for an article. The best way to do that is by having reliable sources of information external to the subject. If you would like for it to be restored to your user space where you may work on it in peace, please feel free to ask. --B (talk) 12:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Fairfield Country Day School
- Fairfield_Country_Day_School · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
page deleted by Paster Theo -Shaydonfcds (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Done The deleting admin has been banned and it looks like a rather bad deletion (he should have reverted to a prior non-spam version rather than simply deleting), so I have restored it. Please note that it needs to have reliable sources and needs to establish that this is a notable topic. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) for the relevant notability guideline. As it stands now, the article likely would not survive a nomination for deletion. --B (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Bentley Jones
- Bentley Jones · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]
The 2nd discussion regarding the deletion of the article lacks any opposition, based solely on the unanimous uninformedness of the partakers of said discussion. My argument is parallel to that of DolphinBlueUK's in the initial deletion nomination, in that Bentley Jones does indeed possess a vast presence in many online communities, and is exceedingly successful in Japan. Moreover, a source cleanup should be in order, as the fact that the sources are primarily to his blog is understandably an issue. -24.16.165.217 (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bentley Jones (2nd nomination). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JForget (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
pn game on t v espn
reasoning -99.62.215.136 (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done I'm sorry, but there is not enough information from what you said to know what you are talking about. We need to know the exact name of the article. --B (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Xyzmo SIGNificant Group
- Xyzmo SIGNificant Group · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
It is written the same way as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARX_(Algorithmic_Research) which I used as an orientation for creating the entry as it is also a company like ARX or EchoSign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EchoSign) in the digital signature industry. -Markush8 (talk) 07:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Desmond Tardy
- Desmond Tardy · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
reasoning -128.210.2.34 (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Specific inconsistencies need to be rectified...
This article was linked to by several other articles such as from Ryan Baker (American football) and various Purdue Football season log/history articles (for which most of the links have since been removed). The primary link of concern is from Mr. Football Award (Indiana) for which several of the other players listed as recipients of that honor, who have no greater notability, have not had their respective articles deleted. If Desmond Tardy must remain permanently deleted then several of the other Mr. Football Award (Indiana) recipients should also be deleted for consistency in the application of the Notability in Wikipedia policies. Either restore this article and the subsequent links, or delete the respective articles of the other recipients of the award such as Morgan Newton and/or Darren Evans who have no greater notability than Desmond Tardy. There were no external article references listed on the original wikipedia article for Desmond Tardy outside of the Purdue Player Bio since the online articles for the award from that year (and previous years for that matter) have since been taken down from the newspaper's website, namely The Indianapolis Star that is the primary sponsor of the award. NOTE: The MR. Football award is the highest award for a single player in Indiana High School Football as it is voted on by all Indiana high school football coaches.
Either restore this article or delete the other equally notable/unnotable articles concerning the recipients of the Mr. Football award. (Some of the other recipients of the award are of greater notability and should NOT be deleted though!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.210.2.34 (talk • contribs)
- Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desmond Tardy. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Though I agree with you that this individual is likely notable, it was deleted because it was completely unsourced. Articles that do not have multiple reliable sources independent of the subject are usually deleted. --B (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Mstr Jonathan Matthew Melllor
- Mstr Jonathan Matthew Melllor · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Because Mstr Jonathan Matthew Mellor is a real english actor and has huge contacts within the television & media plus known for his acting on TV & Theatre and wikipedia won't get alot of views if you delete it... -Jonathanmmellor (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 16:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Carl Yankowski
- Carl Yankowski · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
reasoning -69.102.93.188 (talk) 13:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Article was accurate and easily verifiable
Col. Archibald Dennison Scott III
- Col. Archibald Dennison Scott III · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I believe this article has some significant historical value. This man a very important figure in military history and is well known by many other historical and current figures that you have listed in articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtsflorida (talk • contribs)
- Not done for several reasons. (1) From your edit summary, you seem to be saying you copied it from military.com. Wikipedia does not accept content copied from other sources. (2) Wikipedia is not an obituary. This individual's notability needs to be demonstrated by providing one or more reliable sources of information independent of the subject. --B (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Alison "Nugget" Matasi
- Alison "Nugget" Matasi · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
No reasoning given. -robfromvan 00:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC) Not done since it hasn't been deleted yet there is nothing for us to do but as an unsourced biography our policy requires this to be properly sourced or it will be deleted. Spartaz Humbug! 02:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Orange Caramel
- Orange Caramel · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
There are no reason to delete that article, Orange Caramel is a real and famous south korean girls group. -87.4.46.237 (talk) 11:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or bands will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 12:46, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Marc Aryan · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
The article was abouta notable musician, My proposed article had good sources ,My submission was neutral, established notability, and was not copy-pasteded from anywhere else and I have no relation to the artist -Marcaryan (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Nyttend (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
List of National Speech and Debate Tournament Champions
- List of National Speech and Debate Tournament Champions · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
There is no reason to delete the informative page that allows individuals to view former national champions in high school speech/debate events. -24.15.2.252 (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
world congress of philosophy
reasoning -Oleolson7 (talk) 00:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Please undelete page for [Alan Olson] so that it can be further developed.
- Not done. If you are asking for Alan Olson · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] to be restored, this was deleted as a copyright violation. There is no bar against creating a sourced, neutral article about him that does not violate copyrights provided that it complies with the guideline on notability of people. If you are asking for World Congress of Philosophy, it already exists. --B (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Shaytards
This family have become a national institution. There following on youtube is now in excess of 28,000 and more information about this family should be readily available. Any family who throw themselves into the public environment has to expect a certain ammount of interest, but of course elements of privacy are essential - especially as there are small children within the family. A public page with suitable information is a way of achieving this. -86.154.9.142 (talk) 06:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done. Please see the deletion review of this topic at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 June 9. --B (talk) 10:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
The entry about our website/newsletter was deleted for reason A7 (Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) I would like to add details to clarify its significance, ie as the first and still most successful medical e-newsletter for doctors in Australia. Our newsletter has revently been cited in the Australian Senate in discussions on the Labor government's health reforms. -203.51.125.174 (talk) 08:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Done Imho, the deletion was incorrect anyway (the original already claimed significance) but you should add reliable sources, otherwise the article may still be deleted again. Regards SoWhy 09:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Epilepsy York Region · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
this page gives vital information about a service that is provided in York Region, the first time it was deleated was because it was almost the same as their website, but i have gone back and reworded everything ( just kept the mission statement) into my own words, then the next time it was significance and i thought it was self explaintory that this orginization provides information and services to the comminunity, but i have gone into further details and explinations about what this NPO does. Epilepsy York Region provides a great service for those with epilepsy and informs the public, they should be more known and wiki is the place to do it -Purpleepilepsy (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not done Please, read WP:NOBLECAUSE. Wikipedia (not wiki; a "wiki" is a type of software) is not "the place to do it" when you are attempting to publicise an organization. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Epilepsy York Region · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
i dont understand why this page is any different than any other Non Profit orginization that is up on wikipedia, my goal is not to publicise... it is just facts maybe my wording of " place to do it was wrong". Wikipeida is a great data base and has many NPOs on it and this is just another one that should be on the list -Purpleepilepsy (talk) 14:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Because EYR is not a notable organization; simple as that. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
DJ T. Lewis
- DJ T. Lewis · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I have tons of sources to prove that my article is geared toward a real person. Maybe I am entering they codes wrong. Exactly what would you suggest me do to keep my client's page valid? We can not afford to have this page deleted, especially with the associations that he has. He is about to sign a major deal and with his page gone, he is inexistent to the public eye. -Iamspaceage (talk) 16:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Death of Neda Agha-Soltan · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Neda Agha-Soltan was a real person and her death was just ONE aspect of her life. I request that the original Neda Agha-Soltan page be reinstated as most users will not search for "death of", furthermore, its been a year and people search for Neda, not her death, as she is now a symbolic historical figure -Wahica (talk) 17:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- This was redirected and merged after a community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neda Agha-Soltan. You need to use the article talk page to get a consensus to move it back. Spartaz Humbug! 18:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
The Vietnamization of New Jersey
- The Vietnamization of New Jersey · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I think the notability concerns can be addressed by including some of the reliable sources that discuss the play, including a 2007 New York Times review. I'll be happy to add these to the article if restored. -28bytes (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC)