Content deleted Content added
Shibbolethink (talk | contribs) →User:Shibbolethink: add links |
Bot clerking, 1 user with previously declined requests |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
* {{rfplinks|1=Shibbolethink}} |
* {{rfplinks|1=Shibbolethink}} |
||
:I previously requested rollback but was told to come back in a few weeks after more substantial anti-vandalism contributions. I've been filtering recent changes on a substantial amount of articles since. Many of these edits are buried amongst other changes using my account, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150419072435&target=Shibbolethink here] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415200052&target=Shibbolethink are] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415200052&target=Shibbolethink some] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415153525&target=Shibbolethink good] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415153525&target=Shibbolethink stretches] of anti-vandalism edits. [[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 17:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
:I previously requested rollback but was told to come back in a few weeks after more substantial anti-vandalism contributions. I've been filtering recent changes on a substantial amount of articles since. Many of these edits are buried amongst other changes using my account, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150419072435&target=Shibbolethink here] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415200052&target=Shibbolethink are] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415200052&target=Shibbolethink some] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415153525&target=Shibbolethink good] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink&offset=20150415153525&target=Shibbolethink stretches] of anti-vandalism edits. [[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 17:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
:{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?&oldid=656275008#User:Shibbolethink]). <span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 18:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:20, 30 April 2015
Rollback
- ( • view requests)
Please familiarize yourself with Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request.Misuse of the feature, even if unintentional or in good faith, may give cause for it to be removed. |
To make a request, please follow the instructions below:
NOTE: It is unlikely that users with fewer than 200 mainspace edits will be granted the use of this tool. Please consider enrolling at the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy to learn more about handling vandalism.
Requests that do not meet the above criteria will be delayed or removed. |
Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Administrator notation templates
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This template is used to answer requests for permissions, especially the rollback user right. ::{{subst:RFPR|option}} ~~~~
|
User:Supdiop
- Supdiop (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have a good understanding of policies of wikipedia and I am currently patrolling new pages and occasionally reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. I am requesting the rollback right because I want to focus on reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits beside patrolling new pages. Supdiop (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not done I have been looking over your contribs and your talk page and I do not believe your understanding of Wikipedia policies is solid as you claim. You've made somel deletion nominations that were apparently inappropriate, and you created an article that met multiple speedy deletion criteria as well as not even being in English. Although these are seperate issues from vandalism patrolling, it seems you generally have a very shallow, incomplete understanding of the policies you have been attempting to uphold, which gives me no faith that you would use rollback appropriately. I would suggest getting some experience manually dealing with vandals, and taking advantage of WP:CVU to help you gain an adequate understanding of the correct methods for dealing with vandals. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- I learned a lot in between. I created that article to test an idea. I didn't find article creation wizard in Telugu Wikipedia so I thought of creating article in English Wikipedia and moving it to Telugu Wikipedia. It didn’t work so I blanked the article but they tagged it with 'no content' and 'no context' tags instead of tagging it with author request(See history of that article if you want to). Another is I tagged speedy deletion too soon but I tagged it with correct tag. I did a lot of anti vandalism work, see my contribs. Even though I am new, I spent lot of time on wikipedia. I wanted to do more anti-vandalism work but it is hard to do without rollback right. I agree that I made mistakes at first but I am confident now. I am committed to help Wikipedia and this reject will not deter me at all. Thank you. Supdiop (talk) 00:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not done I have been looking over your contribs and your talk page and I do not believe your understanding of Wikipedia policies is solid as you claim. You've made somel deletion nominations that were apparently inappropriate, and you created an article that met multiple speedy deletion criteria as well as not even being in English. Although these are seperate issues from vandalism patrolling, it seems you generally have a very shallow, incomplete understanding of the policies you have been attempting to uphold, which gives me no faith that you would use rollback appropriately. I would suggest getting some experience manually dealing with vandals, and taking advantage of WP:CVU to help you gain an adequate understanding of the correct methods for dealing with vandals. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Sharif uddin
- Sharif uddin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have been editing on wikipedia since one year and besides editing I have also written 12 valid articles. I am requesting the rollback right because I want to focus on reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits beside patrolling new pages. Sharif uddin (talk) 22:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Is there a reason that you have copied the last sentence of the previous request? Origamiteⓣⓒ 03:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not done Clear, civil communication is part of editing here, even when dealing with vandalism. Your style of cimmunication is muddled and seems to sometimes border on incivility. I also see no evidence you do anti-vandalism work now, despite the last sentnce of your request, which as noted above was clearly copied from the previous request. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
User:CookieMonster755
- CookieMonster755 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I am requesting rollback rights (again) to further fight vandalism on Wikipedia. Having rollback rights would really help me revert vandalism I see in the recent edits page. I have re-read Wikipedia's vandalism information page and what vandalism is and is not. I currently use Twinkle, but rollback rights would further make the job easier, and would let me have access to Huggle, another create program for reverting vandalism. I also have practiced at the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy. I have about 1,800+ main space edits and have rebuilt my Wikipedia reputation. I currently have pending-changes reviewer rights. Excited to join the new community of rollback users on Wikipedia. Cheers. CookieMonster755 (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Nakon: any comment on this? They've come back after the absolute bare minimum timeframe you told them to wait and seem a little too eager to possess this flag. It kind of concerns me. On the other hand, the vandalism reversions since the last request do look fine. I'll give you the chance to reassess. Swarm we ♥ our hive 05:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Swarm: I waited 2 weeks like Nakon said. If you still feel like I am not ready or your concerned, I understand. Whatever your answer is on the decision is fine with me :) Cheers. CookieMonster755 (talk) 14:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Swarm:, I'm OK with the time frame, I'll leave the decision to you. Nakon 23:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Swarm we ♥ our hive 02:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Praveenp
- Praveenp (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I recently happened to undo a lot of edits by single purpose accounts. Rollback button will be useful. :-) Praveen:talk 14:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not done. Thank you for your recent work reverting the removal of content from articles. Your help here is definitely appreciated and I hope you'll continue to assist Wikipedia. However, rollback is for reverting obvious vandalism only, and while removing content without explanation is disruptive and unhelpful, it's does not qualify as obvious vandalism that should be rolled back. If you ever become involved in anti-vandalism work, please do come back and we'll be happy to review another request. If you're interested in getting involved, check out the Academy! Swarm we ♥ our hive 05:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
User:ZxxZxxZ
- ZxxZxxZ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I don't patrol regularly, but I often edit using mobile with a not-so-fast Internet connection, so the tool is useful for me. I sometimes edit highly sensitive topics, but I will use it in a responsible manner (I already have administrator access in two other WM projects). Z 16:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Shibbolethink
- Shibbolethink (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I previously requested rollback but was told to come back in a few weeks after more substantial anti-vandalism contributions. I've been filtering recent changes on a substantial amount of articles since. Many of these edits are buried amongst other changes using my account, but here are some good stretches of anti-vandalism edits. Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 18:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)