Vanished87817173 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
:::::I was going to deny this request for the above reason, and because I don't see enough general experience from you, especially vandalism reversions, but Reaper beat me to it. Trust is a big part of granting these rights, and hiding/removing another user's post because it reflects badly on you is not something that demonstrates trustworthiness. Removing or altering other user's comments is in itself generally unacceptable. [[User talk:INeverCry|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font face="AR Cena" color="black"><b>INeverCry</b></font></span>]] 02:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC) |
:::::I was going to deny this request for the above reason, and because I don't see enough general experience from you, especially vandalism reversions, but Reaper beat me to it. Trust is a big part of granting these rights, and hiding/removing another user's post because it reflects badly on you is not something that demonstrates trustworthiness. Removing or altering other user's comments is in itself generally unacceptable. [[User talk:INeverCry|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font face="AR Cena" color="black"><b>INeverCry</b></font></span>]] 02:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::::What do you mean by "general experience"? --<span style="font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; text-shadow: 2px 2px 10px rgba(0,0,0,1); color: green;"><font color="green">[[User:Archcaster|拱連鑄機]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Archcaster|談話]]</font></span> 03:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC) |
::::::What do you mean by "general experience"? --<span style="font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; text-shadow: 2px 2px 10px rgba(0,0,0,1); color: green;"><font color="green">[[User:Archcaster|拱連鑄機]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Archcaster|談話]]</font></span> 03:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::::::2 and 1/2 months on Wikipedia, only 540 edits, and only a small number of reverts, is a pretty low level of general editing experience, which is what admins use to judge your readiness for a right like reviewer. See [[Wikipedia:Reviewing]] for the specific areas of experience that are most relevant to granting and use of the reviewer right. [[User talk:INeverCry|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font face="AR Cena" color="black"><b>INeverCry</b></font></span>]] 03:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
====[[User:BenisonPBaby]]==== |
====[[User:BenisonPBaby]]==== |
Revision as of 03:17, 9 July 2013
Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer
- ( • view requests)
User:SteliosGR
- SteliosGR · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
I have made so much edits on wikipedia regarding mainly football articles, created pages and significantly contributed to them, such as 2013–14 Atromitos F.C. season, 2013–14 AEK Athens F.C. season and 2013–14 Football League (Greece) and some templates regarding to teams. I am a member of wikipedia 4 years now (since 2009) and have been contributing to many articles. I also know what vandalism is and I know how to deal with such situations and accounts.
Thank you in advance,
–SteliosGR.
There might be some problems with my userpage, but I am surely going to make it better as it is one of my next goals.
Edit: There was a serious issue on the Fb cs footer template page, which hindered many football club player statistic pages to seem proper. I fixed the problem with this edit, adding a solution to the problem, as you can see here. This thing was something that people did not want to happen, and I think I fixed it in the best way.
- (Non-administrator comment) At the time, I don't see many vandalism reverts but I do see you patrolling some pages with pending changes protection. Just so you know being a reviewer is monitoring pages with pending changes protection, when an edit is made, the reviewer decides to accept if it is not vandalism and revert or decline if it is. I personally would recommend you to read WP:BLP, because as a reviewer most pages with pending changes are biographies of living people, some content can be controversial or some unsourced. Prabash.Akmeemana 14:23, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Looking through your edit history, I see a handful of reverts, but I don't see any experience with reverting vandalism. As per Wikipedia:Reviewing, we need to see experience in this area. I would suggest asking for this right after you've done a couple hundred reverts of instances of vandalism. INeverCry 01:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
User:Pseudonymous Rex
- Pseudonymous Rex · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- I'd like Reviewer rights so vandalism reversions don't end up as more work for others to accept. I'd also like the additional options when reviewing article feedback. Thank you. Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
User:Vivvt
- Vivvt · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- With more than 15000 edits and 65 articles and 20 templates creations in hand, I believe I am eligible to have this particular right. - Vivvt (Talk) 18:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)Seems fine with me, though a question rises on whether you know what the job of a reviewer is, respond on my talk page, as I don't want this to be turned into a discussion board. Prabash.Akmeemana 14:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Replied. - Vivvt (Talk) 23:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Done Although it's a tad late, Vivvt, you didn't need to bother "explaining yourself" on Prabash's talk page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Replied. - Vivvt (Talk) 23:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)Seems fine with me, though a question rises on whether you know what the job of a reviewer is, respond on my talk page, as I don't want this to be turned into a discussion board. Prabash.Akmeemana 14:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
User:Archcaster
- Archcaster · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- Hello, I would like to become a reviewer because I would like to prevent vandalism on various pending changes protection pages, such as The X Factor and other articles. --Archcaster 02:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Cue Attn. reviewing administrator: [1], [2], [3]. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 21:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not done and not likely to be done Per this. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- You can't just denied it because I undid a unnecessary edit by a user. 拱連鑄機談話 01:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- I absolutely will deny any requests when you try to to cover up information that might reflect poorly on your request. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- I was going to deny this request for the above reason, and because I don't see enough general experience from you, especially vandalism reversions, but Reaper beat me to it. Trust is a big part of granting these rights, and hiding/removing another user's post because it reflects badly on you is not something that demonstrates trustworthiness. Removing or altering other user's comments is in itself generally unacceptable. INeverCry 02:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "general experience"? --拱連鑄機談話 03:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- 2 and 1/2 months on Wikipedia, only 540 edits, and only a small number of reverts, is a pretty low level of general editing experience, which is what admins use to judge your readiness for a right like reviewer. See Wikipedia:Reviewing for the specific areas of experience that are most relevant to granting and use of the reviewer right. INeverCry 03:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "general experience"? --拱連鑄機談話 03:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- You can't just denied it because I undid a unnecessary edit by a user. 拱連鑄機談話 01:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not done and not likely to be done Per this. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Cue Attn. reviewing administrator: [1], [2], [3]. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 21:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
User:BenisonPBaby
- BenisonPBaby · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- I am actively contributing for articles related to astronomy like space probes, satellite,voyager 1, etc. I updates their information daily. I also know what vandalism is and I know how to deal with such situations. BenisonPBaby 11:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions to space-related articles! Unfortunately, I'm going to have to mark this as Not done at this time, since you don't really have the requisite experience. As an aside, when you add information, please remember to include a reference to keep Wikipedia's information verifiable. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
User:Jcc
- Jcc · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ( · · · c)
- I have contributed massively to the fight against vandalism, and find it only right that the next step is reviewer rights. My main anti-vandalism tool is Lupin's. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Done INeverCry 01:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)