Jetstreamer (talk | contribs) Requesting semi-protection of Air Serbia. (TW) |
Mark Miller (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
'''Temporary full protection:''' Persistent content disputes, post has made it to the the front page of reddit.com/r/atheism requesting edits be made to match a non-neutral point of view. I believe temporary protection should be added until everything settles down. [[User:Tryme1029|Tryme1029]] ([[User talk:Tryme1029|talk]]) 00:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
'''Temporary full protection:''' Persistent content disputes, post has made it to the the front page of reddit.com/r/atheism requesting edits be made to match a non-neutral point of view. I believe temporary protection should be added until everything settles down. [[User:Tryme1029|Tryme1029]] ([[User talk:Tryme1029|talk]]) 00:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
:I think a pending changes protection would probably be best. However, the semi-protection has just been put into effect so it's best to let it be. It will block any new editors who come here from other websites to be able to edit freely. We can trust establish users to settle their differences on the talk page, which they are in fact doing right now. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User talk:Feedback|<big><font color="#039">'''''Feed'''''</big>]][[Special:Contributions/Feedback|<big><font color="#008000">'''''back'''''</big>]]</font color></span> 01:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
:I think a pending changes protection would probably be best. However, the semi-protection has just been put into effect so it's best to let it be. It will block any new editors who come here from other websites to be able to edit freely. We can trust establish users to settle their differences on the talk page, which they are in fact doing right now. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User talk:Feedback|<big><font color="#039">'''''Feed'''''</big>]][[Special:Contributions/Feedback|<big><font color="#008000">'''''back'''''</big>]]</font color></span> 01:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
::Support full protection. All that seems to be happening is a lot of personal attacks on the talk page when real discussion is attempted and edit warring of biased editors continues with accusations, hidden messages and attempts to use a supposed consensus from other articles to push a POV on this one. Time to just protect the article.--[[User:Mark Miller|Mark Miller]] ([[User talk:Mark Miller|talk]]) 11:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==== {{la|Donetsk}} ==== |
==== {{la|Donetsk}} ==== |
Revision as of 11:15, 7 October 2014
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | |
---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Air Serbia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by an IP editor that has already been blocked for exactly the same editing pattern using another IP. Jetstreamer Talk 10:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Person of Interest (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war related to lengthy discussions on the talk page. AussieLegend (✉) 09:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
North West Rail Link (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. For example, calling the project a "downgrade" (giving opinions), as well as changing the title of references and the rest of the article from "Rail" to "Light Rail". I have requested page protection in June 2014 and the page was protected for one week. Request protection for at least 2 or 3 weeks. Marcnut1996 (talk) 08:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Super Mario Galaxy 3 ( | article | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons persistently remove speedy deletion tag. Maybe salt as well. —teb728 t c 08:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
User talk:XxXx$$ YOLOSWAG420BLAZEIT $$xXxX ( | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Materialscientist (talk) 06:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Sitting Ducks (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A couple of IPs have targeted this article for repeated blanking. Requesting a few days protection from IPs to stall them out; bring them back to Chill Town. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
2014 in LGBT rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Nothing has been learned since last time. There is a talk page discussion on this, but instead we're back to simple reverting. Dennis Bratland (talk) 03:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Low-carbohydrate diet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – persistent editwarring against consensus . Yobol (talk) 01:49, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Marquee Moon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and newly registered users, likely because of its appearance on the main page as today's featured article. Dan56 (talk) 01:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Declined. Not too bad for a WP:TFA. Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
2014 military intervention against ISIL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Move warring, despite an ongoing RM on the talk page. Now spread to multiple AN/Is. Best to force talk page discussion, if you ask me. This is getting tiresome. RGloucester — ☎ 01:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: Addition of unsourced / poorly sourced content. There's been recent news that this game for release on the Nintendo WiiU has seemingly be delayed until early 2015. EternalFloette (talk) 01:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
South Park (season 18) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Consistent attempt to add WP:COPYVIO material to the article. Request of protection until end of December, when the season is scheduled to end. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Hilary Duff discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection Disruptive editing IPs constantly add chart peaks that aren't supported by the sources provided.--Harout72 (talk) 01:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Historicity of Jesus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full protection: Persistent content disputes, post has made it to the the front page of reddit.com/r/atheism requesting edits be made to match a non-neutral point of view. I believe temporary protection should be added until everything settles down. Tryme1029 (talk) 00:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- I think a pending changes protection would probably be best. However, the semi-protection has just been put into effect so it's best to let it be. It will block any new editors who come here from other websites to be able to edit freely. We can trust establish users to settle their differences on the talk page, which they are in fact doing right now. Feedback 01:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support full protection. All that seems to be happening is a lot of personal attacks on the talk page when real discussion is attempted and edit warring of biased editors continues with accusations, hidden messages and attempts to use a supposed consensus from other articles to push a POV on this one. Time to just protect the article.--Mark Miller (talk) 11:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Donetsk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring ongoing for days. RGloucester — ☎ 23:36, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Ice Bucket Challenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 vandalism edits since October 4. Jinkinson talk to me 22:01, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 01:20, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: Page has not been protected.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 05:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Tungchow Mutiny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring. Five new users since October 5 editing and reverting. Blackguard 19:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 05:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Constitutional challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
7-days semi-protection: Edit warring against consensus by anonymous editor across multiple IP addresses. The first IP was already blocked by Wifione, more details here. Wifione appears to be taking a wikibreak. Full protection was put in place for 3 days, edit warring continued unabated when it expired. Full protection is ok. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Fulfilled/denied requests
A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.