Semi-auto-clerking: [PR: 1 | UR: 0 | RfSE: 0 | FR: 4] (13 reports pending) |
|||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
:::I'll wait another week or two. [[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 17:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC) |
:::I'll wait another week or two. [[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 17:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
::::I don't see any need to wait to reply. {{RFPP|nu}}. I don't know why this account is not blocked itself given the number of socks in [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mcfly85]]. Giben that this account stopped editing in 2008 one wonders why they even care but RTV is not extended to sockpupeteers. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 20:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
::::I don't see any need to wait to reply. {{RFPP|nu}}. I don't know why this account is not blocked itself given the number of socks in [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mcfly85]]. Giben that this account stopped editing in 2008 one wonders why they even care but RTV is not extended to sockpupeteers. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 20:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::::I never used a sockpuppet, it was some witch-hunt back then. And I haven't edited since 2005, but started in 2003. And in 2006 and 2007, no one had a problem with me keeping my original message. If I am not banned or blocked, why can't I edit my user page? Doesn't make any sense. I hope to get additional opinions on this matter and |
:::::I never used a sockpuppet, it was some witch-hunt back then. And I haven't edited since 2005, but started in 2003. And in 2006 and 2007, no one had a problem with me keeping my original message. If I am not banned or blocked, why can't I edit my user page? Doesn't make any sense. I hope to get additional opinions on this matter and it should not be considered closed at this time. [[User:Mcfly85|Mcfly85]] ([[User talk:Mcfly85|talk]]) 21:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
=== {{la|The Emperor's New Groove}} === |
=== {{la|The Emperor's New Groove}} === |
Revision as of 21:34, 2 August 2012
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | |
---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for protection
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Uzbekistan Airways (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: IP user keeps removing content based on their experience instead of complying with WP:V. Jetstreamer Talk 21:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Todd Palin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – See recent edits by ser:74.177.231.75. ukexpat (talk) 20:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Mystikal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs - recent vandalism; I suspect the artist's upcoming re-release from prison will bring a rise in media attention and the nature of his crimes are likely to incite additional attacks. There have also been a large number of unreferenced edits being added from unregistered users. Cheers! Stella BATPHONEGROOVES 17:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Metropolitan Borough of Stockport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs (probably with the same editor behind them) have been repeatedly adding unconstructive comments about the Liberal Democrat council and undoing reverts removing the comments.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Michael Anon (talk) 16:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs (probably with the same editor behind them) have been repeatedly adding unconstructive comments about the Liberal Democrat council and undoing reverts removing the comments.[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Michael Anon (talk) 16:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
American Life (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: Constant edit war between a couple of IPs and users. 11Jorn leave a message 15:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
FCW Divas Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
− Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly vandalised article (mainly people adding to Diva Champion reigns without sources they have been doing this for two-three mounths now --SCWA Ladies Champion (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Kezie Ibe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: Constant edit war between a couple of IPs and users, despite previous bans. --Jimbo[online] 14:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Cadillac Seville (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war going on regarding the inclusion of a trivia section sourced solely to IMCDB (a user-generated and hence unreliable source). Multiple IPs in use. Attempts to communicate with the user adding the contest info have met with this sort of response, suggesting that discussion isn't going to solve much. Reporting here since I am somewhat involved, having made a couple of reverts myself. Yunshui 雲水 09:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
List of Olympic medalists for the Philippines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs getting way too giddy. –HTD 08:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Wandering Son (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: After the result of a discussion at WP:DRN, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 33#Wandering Son, the article in question was reverted to a previous state where, long story short, the pronouns of the assigned sexes of certain characters were used. The article has been edited by IP 50.128.198.195 (talk · contribs) on four separate occasions since the end of that discussion (on June 18, July 21, August 1 and August 2), and has been reverted as the IP's edits was against the consensus established by the discussion at DRN. In the discussion, one of the commentators suggested asking for page protection if further edits against consensus were done, so here we are. Also, these continued edits are disruptive to the article's status as a GA, as the article must maintain a certain level of quality to retain that status; just look at their edit where they also inadvertently removed the Japanese text and proper links to the images: [17]. Their edits also constitute violations of WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR as outlined at the bottom of Talk:Wandering Son#Pronouns again. 十八 05:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Bodhidharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Indefinite Semi-protection: This page recently came off of another 3 month semi-protect. It has been semi-protected a total of 5 times, 4 of those in the last 7 months. It has continually received unconstructive edits from anon and newly registered users ever since the film 7am Arivu came out. The film serves as a fictional biography for a popular historical Buddhist monk. Many of the disruptive editors remove sourced scholarly information and replace it with legendary material from the movie. All them, even the newly registered users, refuse to take part in discussions. Ghostexorcist (talk) 02:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Carl Djerassi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: A long-time persistently disruptive IP-hopping anonymous editor is back to edit warring across a series of articles inserting trivia, WP:SYNTH and COPYVIOs against consensus without contributing to talk page discussions.
Combined oral contraceptive pill, Upjohn, Stigmasterol, Mexican barbasco trade, and Soybean also need semi-protection.
Because of similar disruption by this IP-hopping anonymous editor: Carl Djerassi was previously semi-protected for 1 month, Combined oral contraceptive pill was previously semi-protected for 1 week then 1 month then 3 months, and Soybean was previously semi-protected for 2 weeks then 1 month then 3 months.
Additionally, because of similar disruption by this IP-hopping anonymous editor: Percy Lavon Julian was previously semi-protected for 3 days then 3 months then 6 months and currently, Progesterone was previously semi-protected for 1 month then 1 month then 6 months and currently, Soybean oil was previously semi-protected for 1 month, Soy protein was previously semi-protected for 1 month, and Cortisone was previously semi-protected for 1 month. Lynn4 (talk) 00:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Bat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Webclient101 (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Gareth Bale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Page is being targeted with the same speculative edit from multiple IP users. Could it be protected for a week until they get bored or an official announcement is made. noq (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Heart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Webclient101 (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigmamsg 20:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Table tennis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP Vandalism. Anbu121 (talk me) 18:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Syria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Indefinite move-protection Recently removed by mistake (Twinkle bug) / no reason to be moved. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) There is no need to protected this article, as it was never moved. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 19:42, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not again. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- And contact User:NawlinWiki if you have a problem with the "never moved pages" instead of fuck with me. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:05, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, and in fact it was moved in the past: "03:38, 30 September 2007 Chaser (talk | contribs) deleted page Syria (deleted to make way for move)": Syria promotes terrorists. They took in top Nazi war criminals and gave them jobs as government advisors. Syria should be wiped from this earth.. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, everybody please calm down. Move logs can sometimes be tricky to read. It appears move protection was accidently removed when the current edit protection was applied. Move protected. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Miloš Krasić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Collective vandalism yet again, false information (or unsourced) introduced concerning subject's football club coupled with blatant vandalism (eg. addition of "homosexual" before team name). Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 17:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 21:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
List of British words not widely used in the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: Requested because of continued edits by User:Mutt Lunker and User:PRL42 adding "citations" to blogs that seem to violate NPOV/RS/SOAPBOX and pose an invidious form of vandalism under a claim of providing examples of "relevant usage" that is little more than masked political criticism and sentiment. Better alternatives are available and this is a subtle political attack. Examples discussed at admin noticeboard and article's talk page.---ColonelHenry (talk) 15:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Samsung Galaxy S III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For 2 months, continued IP vandalism, and addition of unsourced material. ObtundTalk 02:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Current requests for unprotection
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
User:Mcfly85 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection Would like original farewell message left on there, and not an accusation. Mcfly85 (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Note: Please contact User:Bibliomaniac15 directly. Deryck C. 10:06, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have done that, however, that user has not made an edit in over a month. Mcfly85 (talk) 22:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'll wait another week or two. Deryck C. 17:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see any need to wait to reply. Not unprotected. I don't know why this account is not blocked itself given the number of socks in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mcfly85. Giben that this account stopped editing in 2008 one wonders why they even care but RTV is not extended to sockpupeteers. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I never used a sockpuppet, it was some witch-hunt back then. And I haven't edited since 2005, but started in 2003. And in 2006 and 2007, no one had a problem with me keeping my original message. If I am not banned or blocked, why can't I edit my user page? Doesn't make any sense. I hope to get additional opinions on this matter and it should not be considered closed at this time. Mcfly85 (talk) 21:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see any need to wait to reply. Not unprotected. I don't know why this account is not blocked itself given the number of socks in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mcfly85. Giben that this account stopped editing in 2008 one wonders why they even care but RTV is not extended to sockpupeteers. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'll wait another week or two. Deryck C. 17:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have done that, however, that user has not made an edit in over a month. Mcfly85 (talk) 22:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The Emperor's New Groove (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Does anyone think this is ready to be unprotected? I would have contacted the protecting admin, but both he and his fall-back person are retired. Was protected three years ago cuz of socking. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support unprotection. I feel that this article has been protected long enough and should be given a chance for IPs to edit. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please make unprotection requests at WP:RFUP. Rjd0060 (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's not a "request", per se, as I could do it myself. It's looking for a consensus as those involved are off the Wiki now. Moved anyways. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support — Seems rather irrelevant to maintain the ban at this point, seeing as how Bambifan is no longer active on this site (as far as I'm aware). I even feel inclined to urge an administrator to just be bold and unprotect it, as there is little harm to be done in doing so from what I gather. Master&Expert (Talk) 09:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: Bambifan has been active as recently as a few months ago, possibly less. tutterMouse (talk) 11:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- The most recent check user entry is in June, but that was deemed not enough evidence. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know that we needed a vote on this, but Unprotected. Can always be reprotected if you know who returns. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Battle of Aleppo (2012) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Unprotection The page has been protected so nobody can edit it because there were a lot of contradicting edits. But this is because the page is an important real time event and it should be allowed to be edited as important events are modifying the situation every day. In order to be accurate, daily edits are necessary. The page is apparently also on the verge of being featured in the Wikipedia news window so the best and last information has to be included in order to maintain the accuracy of the page. --Galebre (talk) 18:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- . Edit warring was recent and fairly severe. The protecting admin appears to be monitoring the situation, you might want to contact them directly or use {{editprotected}} to propose edits on the article's talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Fulfilled/denied requests
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long term conflict on what to have as the nationality, hopefully page protection will get them to talk about it. Note: I have also warned both editors for edit warring. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also try and encourage the involved parties to open discussion on the talkpage. Yunshui 雲水 13:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Nuri Şahin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: After the last temporary semi-protection ran out, IP vandalism is back again. --Jaellee (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yunshui 雲水 13:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
User:Armbrust/CSD log/Archive 2 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: Request within own userspace per WP:UPROT. No need to edit this page. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 13:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Fully protected Lectonar (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Paris Hilton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism has picked up in the last few days since it was unprotected, some of it are pretty serious BLP violations: [18][19]. Siawase (talk) 10:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yunshui 雲水 10:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)