Bourne End (talk | contribs) Cornchips |
|||
Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
* {{vandal|Cornchips V1.0}} Redirects pages to [[Wayne Rooney]]. Operated suckpuppets, notably [[User:Cornchips V1.1]], [[User:Cornchips on Windows 98]], [[User:Cornchips Version II]], [[User:The three revert rule is a joke]], [[User:3RevertRule]], [[User:HornyGuy90]], [[User:DubGeeza]], [[User:The three revert rule is silly]], [[User:PlatinumDane]]. [[User:Rama|Rama]] 12:48, 7 October 2005 (UTC) |
* {{vandal|Cornchips V1.0}} Redirects pages to [[Wayne Rooney]]. Operated suckpuppets, notably [[User:Cornchips V1.1]], [[User:Cornchips on Windows 98]], [[User:Cornchips Version II]], [[User:The three revert rule is a joke]], [[User:3RevertRule]], [[User:HornyGuy90]], [[User:DubGeeza]], [[User:The three revert rule is silly]], [[User:PlatinumDane]]. [[User:Rama|Rama]] 12:48, 7 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
* Are you sure these are not sockpuppets of the [[notorious]] vandal Willy on Wheels, MARMOT or even The Female Cyclist Vandal?? |
|||
I know there was a {{vandal|Cornchips}} who was blocked. Is this the same one? --[[User:Bourne End|Bourne End]] 13:49, 7 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
* {{vandal|Brandnewyork}} also vandalising as 151.188.16.6, please see report currently in IP Low section [[User:Cdyson37|Cdyson37]] | [[User talk:Cdyson37|(Talk)]] 12:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC) |
* {{vandal|Brandnewyork}} also vandalising as 151.188.16.6, please see report currently in IP Low section [[User:Cdyson37|Cdyson37]] | [[User talk:Cdyson37|(Talk)]] 12:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:49, 7 October 2005
To update this page, /Old version.
. For the old version of this page, seeFor blatant vandalism within the last few hours, please see Administrator intervention against vandalism. This page is for reporting vandalism for which an ongoing response is required. This primarily includes multiple sockpuppets, pages currently being heavily vandalised, users that need to be monitored, open proxies, and vandalism which requires study on the part of an administrator before responding. Accounts that have only been used for vandalism (with no recent activity) should also be reported on this page, so that an administrator can look through their edits. Please make sure to read the first two sections before using this page.
This page is intended to request administrator investigation of certain types of vandalism only. Do not use this page until you read the policies, guidelines, and procedures. For most vandalism, see Administrator intervention against vandalism. Alerts that do not belong on this page will be removed immediately, without response, and without warning. |
Current alerts
IP addresses
Please report vandals who are operating under anonymous IP addresses under the appropriate severity level, at the top.
IP Severe
- 203.12.170.77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Long history of vandalism from this IP, currently Kennedy assassination article is under heavy attack. Note that this IP is used by an entire Australian academic faculty. Esthurin 04:43, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- 82.42.151.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - blanking user talk pages. Andy Mabbett 19:01, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- I use that IP sometimes, and only make legit edits on Wikipedia. Probably not a severe vandal as has made legit edits in the past according to contribs list. --Astwell1986 19:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 216.113.225.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - This user has been previously blocked twice, is at it again. I stumbled across profanity on the St Lawrence River, a glance at the contribs showed many harsh edits to the Microsoft page, and many other edits today. —Papayoung ☯ 15:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 212.248.245.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Numerous polite requests to desist, reverted from its Talkpage. Massive random edits, blanking, furtive misinformation etc. Many edits may remain in Wikipedia. Quite a dangerous vandal. --Wetman 15:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 202.122.69.82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Regardless of the warning already posted in their talk page, this user needs to go. Offensive and derogatory comments have been made many times. Dupz 12:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Is this the right guy? I can't find any offensive and derogatory comments made today, though he may have done so in the past. Seems to be engaged in a very clueless attempt to post an AFD for Tally Hall, but unawareness of procedures is best solved by making someone aware; it doesn't mean the user is intending to vandalize. Jdavidb (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 69.230.206.198 (talk • contribs • block • block log) -- Ongoing hateful, aggressive behaviour; consistently posting material that is obviously inaccurate/unencyclopaedic and more recently, insulting and threatening. Peruvianllama 05:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 80.56.86.189 / 144.137.239.5 / 82.76.30.78 (talk • contribs • block • / 144.137.239.5 / 82.76.30.78 block log) Subtle changes of data in human height reported yesterday, ongoing. I was using data from this page in scholarly research, but will have to find reliable sources instead. Pete.Hurd 19:48, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Protected. Hopefully they'll get tired of waiting and go away. · Katefan0(scribble) 20:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- On 27th September at 2.40pm BST, this person -
"host-194-46-246-153.dsl-ie.utvinternet.net/Username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - defaced a profile about me, making commerically defamatory remarks about me and my company, at Wikipedia." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.32.196 (talk • contribs) )
- A domain address isn't a username. I assume you mean this person 194.46.246.153 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). · Katefan0(scribble) 18:30, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- This user has only made one edit, to vandalize the Ian Davies page several days ago. You reverted it. No block needed. · Katefan0(scribble) 18:31, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- This IP has edited several wikipedia pages, including several changes to data in the human height page, changing data values such as population size of somalia. Many of these have been tagged as vandalism by others. This is subtle change of critical information. Other, older edits, see edit to Congoid are just straightforward racist abuse. Pete.Hurd 18:58, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- This person has only edited once today, and his contrib history isn't very lengthy. This level of vandalism you should be able to deal with yourself; this page is for reporting persistent vandalism that rises to the level of disruption. Just revert his edits. · Katefan0(scribble) 19:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Let me get this straight, this guy vandalized the wiki 16 (SIXTEEN) times since july, and you are not going to block his IP? Adidas
- That's right. The point of a block isn't to be punitive, really, it's to discourage vandalism that is happening right then. Some of the problem with blocks of IP addresses, particularly dynamic IP's is that there is a large potential for collateral damage -- what if I blocked that IP for 48 hours and someone else who wasn't the person doing the vandalizing tried to edit Wikipedia, got discouraged and then we lost someone who could've been a good contributor? IP blocks are very sparsely given and usually for short periods of time (no more than 24 hours) because of this. If this IP starts vandalizing repeatedly I'll be glad to block. Beyond collateral damage issues, though, one or two vandalizing edits are annoying, but regular editors can deal with it themselves through reverting. It should only be reported here if it rises to a level that editors can't deal with, i.e., that it becomes disruptive. Best · Katefan0(scribble) 15:34, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Katefan0 - Is there a place on the wiki where this policy can be discussed? Adidas 05:08, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- My suggestions are, in order of preference, WP:AN, Wikipedia_talk:Vandalism, Wikipedia_talk:Blocking policy, and Wikipedia_talk:Vandalism in progress. Jdavidb (talk) 19:22, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
IP Moderate
- 202.22.168.122 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Repeatedly vandalising User:Adam Bishop. Was blocked earlier for 15 mins by User:Who but is back. He has now created a hate page. --Cactus.man ✍ 09:33, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- 86.133.100.109 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)- adds perverted information to the Ler LaLonde article involving his penis size, completly disgusting, must be stoped. Protozoic Waste 6:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, 6 Octobor 2005 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.103.52 (talk • contribs) ~2005-10-06 12:06:13 (UTC)
- 195.144.130.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - already blocked one, random page vandalism. MosheZadka 14:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 24.82.161.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - spamming Internet-related pages with advertisements for his company. --Goobergunch|? 07:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 210.18.213.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - repeatedly vandalised syphilis and others. Rd232 22:59, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Only one vandalism on the 5th;
none at all since or on the 4th. Maybe he's losing interest. If he does it again, use {{test4}} and if it happens again, report here (and/or on my talk page) requesting a block. Jdavidb (talk) 20:28, 6 October 2005 (UTC) - Oh, he was blocked on the 4th. Jdavidb (talk) 20:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Only one vandalism on the 5th;
- 169.231.28.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - 3 cases of vandalism today (all which occured a few hours ago). May have already given up on edits, but needs monitoring. Dupz 07:49, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 24.208.170.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Has blanked several articles linked to from the Main Page, replacing with not-nice comments. Has been warned before, see his/her talk page. -- TomPreuss 15:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- And I see they were just blocked minutes ago by User:Trevor macinnis for 48 hours. Thanks. -- TomPreuss 15:41, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 81.103.180.173 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Has repeatedly vandalized the Smiley Xtra page, changing links and information to stupid, offensive and obscene statements. Has done so on several occasions.
- Stopped last night. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 83.248.74.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - recently unblocked, and started by vandalizing an userpage. --tyomitch 14:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Blocked again. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:02, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 81.99.112.150 (talk • contribs • block • 81.99.112.150 block log) blanked one whole day of current events and inserted "pennis" into many article. Mamawrites 13:41, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like he's quit for now. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 64.139.74.158. (talk • contribs • block • block log) Has 3 edits to their name, and are all vandalism. Latest edit includes deleting the feature article asthma. Dupz 13:27, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Hasn't edited since this morning. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 217.65.149.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) just adds garbage to articles, so I would have classified this one as low, except that this user also creates articles, that will later have to be deleted.--Silverback 11:38, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like it stopped this morning. Report again if it starts back up. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 69.193.92.180 (talk • contribs • block • block log) Replaced Tamil Tigers with a propaganda cut-paste; Despite warnings/reverts by several users continued, and blanked out the page as the last edit. Greenleaf 07:49, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Has stopped editing. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 69.230.206.198 (talk • contribs • block • block log) Silly vandalism of a high school page. Personal attacks on another editor Ferg2k 07:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like he's stopped. Report again if it starts up again. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
IP Low
- 194.254.207.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - three times in an hour blanked global warming. Rd232 08:56, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- 12.210.1.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- repeat stupid vandalism to Ted Kennedy, warned twice Robert McClenon 11:30, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- 152.91.9.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- just someone making persistant, undiscussed edits with some sort of agenda at Greece- and Macedonia- related articles. I'm already at 2 reverts at Greece, so I'd appreciate it if someone else could keep an eye on this IP.
- 210.50.228.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- adding random stuff to articles -- W P Talk 04:15, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- 81.76.53.165 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) -- "History of the Internet" page is vandalised. "Stupid" entries in "Early Internet Work" and "Early Growth". 129.71.136.164 22:12, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- "Hurricane Stan" page has been vandalised - it has had junk words inserted at various parts eg. "Tropical Storm Stan and began its evil reighn of bunnies" so needs to be reverted to previous version but I don't know how to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.221.7 (talk • contribs) ~2005-10-06 02:35:46 (UTC)
- 199.184.237.243 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Advertising a lyrics site on christian bands. Kertrats | Talk 19:43, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- 202.182.79.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Vandalising multiple Australian based pages over the last day.
- 201.0.28.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) adding spam in Portugese. So far just one on Talk:Rodeo, but something to watch. SchmuckyTheCat 18:54, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 168.9.38.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log): vandalized current events (which I reverted) and has already been warned about something else by another user today (see the IP's talk page). Mamawrites 18:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like he quit after your last warning -- if he vandalizes again, even once more, let me know. · Katefan0(scribble) 18:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 216.11.60.70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log): vandalizing several random pages, already been warned by another user. See my contribs page for the reverts, and his page for the vandalism. --P. B. Mann 17:59, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Too late! :) I already blocked. · Katefan0(scribble) 18:23, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Gosh I'm slow. Thanks for helping!
- 194.187.32.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log): Has vandalised several pages on numerous occasions. Has been warned on the 30th of Sept, but still continues to vandalise. Dupz 14:29, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- It's quit now. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Currently vandalising the Christopher Columbus page, asserts he called himself "The Fag" Cdyson37 | (Talk) 12:01, 5 October 2005 (UTC):
- 151.188.16.6 (talk • contribs • block • block log)
- Brandnewyork (talk • contribs • block • block log) appears to be sock puppet of the above
- He's quit. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 195.194.74.215 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is currently vandalizing...
- Matt Jones (football player) (three times in 10 minutes)
- God
- 24.71.223.140 (talk • contribs • block • block log) Cloveious 06:24, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- He's quit. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- He just vandalized the United Farmers of Alberta by replacing (UFA) with (UrFat).
- 210.0.67.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Subversive 05:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- 165.95.7.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Subversive 05:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above two editors haven't edited for days. This page is only for vandalism in progress. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Registered Users
Please report vandals who are operating under registered usernames under the appropriate severity level, at the top.
RU Severe
RU Moderate
- Mcminat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Brand new member who has vandalised several pages already today. I have warned them with a test2 template in their talk page. Hopefully they'll quit it. Dupz 13:41, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Cornchips V1.0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Redirects pages to Wayne Rooney. Operated suckpuppets, notably User:Cornchips V1.1, User:Cornchips on Windows 98, User:Cornchips Version II, User:The three revert rule is a joke, User:3RevertRule, User:HornyGuy90, User:DubGeeza, User:The three revert rule is silly, User:PlatinumDane. Rama 12:48, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Are you sure these are not sockpuppets of the notorious vandal Willy on Wheels, MARMOT or even The Female Cyclist Vandal??
I know there was a Cornchips (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who was blocked. Is this the same one? --Bourne End 13:49, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Brandnewyork (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) also vandalising as 151.188.16.6, please see report currently in IP Low section Cdyson37 | (Talk) 12:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- BenBurch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Member of Opposing forum (DU) adding libel and unproven story to Free Republic. Content involving Andy Stephenson to Discussion section. See DU forum post: [2].InvictusNox 16:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- This is a content dispute. Please see the instructions I have left on your page, Ben's page, and the page of the anonymous user Ben reported (which I presume is you). Also, you did not follow policy to report, as Ben has not received the warnings specified above. Jdavidb 17:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- BigDaddy777 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - He was blocked earlier for altering comments on talk pages for not completely removing comments. Instead, he kept the signature and changed the comment into something like "Stalker". He was unblocked. But now apparently, he's created an "instant delete" list and he again altered comments [3]. Please reblock him. Apparently, he hasn't learned his lesson yet.--Woohookitty 04:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- I for one am well aware of it, as I am one of the victims. He's already in arbitration, he's showing remarkable restraint in that he's currently unblocked and yet only editing his talk page, and the consensus on WP:AN was that he could do what he wanted with his talk page as long as he didn't leave comments misattributed. Jdavidb (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- IS he currently unblocked? According to this page[4], his IP address is blocked until 3:14 , 6 Oct. If that's true, he's not showing "remarkable restraint" at all. But I could be misreading this, Jdavidb. I assume, as an admin, you have a better method of determining whether he's unblocked. Thanks. Eleemosynary 19:00, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
I'm a new admin, so I'm a little uncertain. But clicking on the "block log" link above (my thanks for someone providing the vandalism template for BigDaddy777, as it was very helpful when I wanted to look at that earlier, anyway) [5], I see two blocks: one from Fvw at 2005-10-03 15:51:57 (my time, I think) which was for 24 hours, and one from CesarB which CesarB himself unblocked at 2005-10-04 22:42:07. As near as I can tell, that does mean he really is unblocked. I'm honestly shocked that he's stuck to touching his talk page. Jdavidb (talk) 19:09, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
OTOH, his IP may be blocked. But my understanding of that (possibly, maybe even probably faulty) is that we deliberately allow unblocked accounts to post from blocked IPs so, for example, we can tell users who share an IP with a troublesome user that they can just log in to get around it. Feel free to correct me; I want to know. BTW, we've probably gone beyond the purpose of WP:VIP, here. Jdavidb (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
RU Low
- Chili69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - adding excessive amounts of low-quality, improperly formatted, and non-copyright verified pictures to Michael Jackson-related articles, reverting edits to "Black or White (Michael Jackson song)" with no attempt to respond to request to stop doing so. --FuriousFreddy 05:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- This appears to be more of a content dispute, though it is annoying that the person won't respond apparently. However, this page is for reporting vandalism -- you might have better luck trying to get some of the pages protected at WP:RFP as a way to force the person to start replying to you. At any rate, they've stopped editing for now. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:35, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Possible Sockpuppets
Current date is June 1, 2024; place new alerts on top.
Please note: This was originally at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, but have added it here due to the vandal's large number of pseudonyms:
- Ich bin ein Berliner
- This page has been repeatedly vandalized, with a variety of user names and anon logons adding the same nonsense to it (claiming that the urban legend is true, and making false assertions about the German language), usually using misleading edit descriptions such as "(improve accuracy)". This is probably one user, but he or she logs in under a variety of sock puppet usernames, most of which were created for the purpose of vandalizing this article. Other users and I have repeatedly added the {{test1}} tag to these userpages, but to no avail. Today, this person has created the username "Prohibit0nions (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)" (with a zero) with the evident intent to pretend to be me (ProhibitOnions, with an O). The vandal's other usernames and IP addresses include: LordCornwall (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Shran (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), OberstKlink (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Smegmann (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), LittleDeadBuddy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), KnightsOfMalta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 38.114.48.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 203.61.246.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 201.240.119.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 38.114.52.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 155.84.57.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 24.0.91.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 211.30.26.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Other apparent sock puppets for this person are YvaBraun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), DonnaReed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Can'tStandYa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), TonyTheTerrier (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), CaptainJackWill (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), WehrWolf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), LesbianLatke (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).
- ProhibitOnions 16:24, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Protected. Please copy this report to Vandalism in progress so that the usernames can be checked and, if necessary, blocked. --Tony SidawayTalk 16:47, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Done. ProhibitOnions 17:12, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- FYI: This user has a long history of improper sock puppetry with a very clear edit pattern and admittedly shared IPs. He is prolific and makes many good edits, but also many less-good ones. I had previously blocked many of the usernames when he began using them in deletions, and after leaving several warnings. The problem seems to have grown worse recently. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#155.84.57.253/24.0.91.81/Shran/et al.. -Willmcw 06:34, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've now blocked all of the listed usernames except
user:KnightsOfMaltaCantStandYa (talk · contribs). -Willmcw 07:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Hough (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- seems to be the latest incarnation of the "Obesity/Girls Aloud" vandal:
--Angr/tɔk tə mi 12:47, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've just blocked him for 24 hours for persistent vandalism. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 13:29, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- 67.137.28.187 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), also gadugi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and mikemartin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) all appear to be the same person, but try to give the indication of otherwise, such as here:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Internet_Shell_Shock. Obviously sock puppets, IMHO.
- 209.247.222.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) blocked for vandalism is now revert warring under the IP address 66.43.173.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), comments on reverts and reverted material is same as performed by banned user. I have also filed a 3RR for 9 reverts in 24 hours. --Gorgonzilla 01:15, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
- Via Egnatia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) resumed (see VIP archive) his ethnic cleansing campaign. MATIA 09:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Crankshuick (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - O^O 00:51, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Crankshuick_1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) blanks Template:Sealand table — Davenbelle 07:25, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Crankshuick_2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) blanks Template:Sealand table — Davenbelle 07:25, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, having read through the recent revert war, this looks like an ordinary content dispute. The claim by ProhibitOnions that his opponents are writing "nonsense" and vandalizing is just false. They are reverting to a version of the article that leaves it uncertain whether the story of Kennedy's alleged goof is true or false. Whereas the version ProhibitOnions prefers comes down decisively that the story is false. I think on the facts of the matter, ProhibitOnions is probably correct, but disagreeing with him is not vandalism. I think Tony Sidaway jumped the gun when he protected the page. (But ProhibitOnions is correct that some of those reverting away from his version are writing misleading edit summaries.) --Nate Ladd 23:32, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Nathan, this is not a simple matter of disagreement. This person has repeatedly changed the article, each time adding different nonsense phrasing that asserts something that is demonstrably false. (It is not simply a weaker prior version of the text, although it is usually based on one.) No, the vandal has never discussed the topic on the talk page. Yes, the vandal uses misleading edit summaries. Apart from creating numerous sock puppets, he has now created a user name that is visually similar to mine (Prohibit0nions vs. ProhibitOnions) and used identical edit summaries to mine ("Reverted to consensus version, vandal warned"). Sorry, this is malicious vandalism, there's no other way to describe it. ProhibitOnions 19:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)