præpuce — A dispute exists at præpuce about whether the præpuce helps protect the protective properties against heat cold, mechanical, et cetera, to such structures as the glans, meatus, frænulum, its own inner smooth and ridge mucosa, et cetera. One side claims it does, while the other side claims that the præpuce is devoid of function. The discussion on the talkpage can be found here: Præpuce
Talk:Prostate cancer - what constitutes a suitable external link for a medical article? On what grounds should these links be removed? 13:03, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Template talk:Suicide-- Should this navigational template for suicide related pages include a short statement that "medical consensus is that people who are considering suicide or having suicidal thoughts should seek immediate assistance"?--Kewp(t) 07:35, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
talk:engram Is engram widely use in Neuroscience? 11:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Mathematics
Talk:Arabic numerals- Dispute over relative emphasis of Hindu and Arabic contributions. 14:52, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mathematics. How to define mathematics. Is the current version POV and/or original research? 15:52, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Sciences
Clinical sciences
talk:Simon Wessely -- POV conflict, mostly relating about Simon Wessely's work on Chronic Fatigue Syndrom. The page is now protected temporarily to deal with libel. 10:48, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Alcubierre_metric -- Should an article describing a scheme for faster-than-light travel exclude a statement of the standard understanding that faster-than-light travel is equivalent to time travel? 02:05 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Fire -- see the section on burninate; does fire's role in animation/cartoons merit a place on this page? 05:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Physical science
Talk:Big Bang – How much room should be given to discussing critisms of the Big Bang hypothesis. 14:50, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:False Doppler – Long dispute about the validity of the term "false doppler". 14:52, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act - on whether or not suspending state liability laws and preventing private persons from insuring themselves against a nuclear catastrophy is protecting the public or Unprotecting the public 00:56, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Yes, this is just a delaying tactic. Please ignore it. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 08:05, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Whats going on with this? no mention on the page or talk page, but suggestion in the archive contining four day old discussion that this is ongoing??? Sandpiper 02:36, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Essentially, I put a test RfC for user Ben Gatti on my personal user page. He decided to open up a RfC on Price-Anderson Act even though we're in our 2nd mediation and this is a long long LONG standing dispute. It goes back to June. I ended up having the one on my user page deleted because it was being edited by Ben and this was just going to be a practice thing. Anyway, his RfC was just a response to mine. As you can see, we're over 400K in archives. If you want to participate, by all means do so. But honestly, it's not absolutely necessary. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 04:15, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Magnetic resonance imaging - Is it wise to have an animated image, contrary to WAI guidelines, on a page which will be of particular interest to people with epilepsy and other brain-related illnesses? 00:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)