Added: Talk:Home Army. |
Maintenance. |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{rfclistintro}} |
{{rfclistintro}} |
||
</noinclude> |
</noinclude> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
What should appear in the article: |
|||
'''A.''' [[Raymond Taras]] has provided an estimate of 150,000 for Axis fatalities incurred due to operations by the Polish underground<ref name="Taras2018"/> (however, estimates of [[guerrilla warfare|guerrilla]]-inflicted casualties often have a wide margin of error<ref name="Laqueur"/>). |
|||
'''B.''' According to historian Marcin Zaremba, until 1944 Germans losses in occupied Poland were lower than 3,000.<ref name=ref3/><ref name=ref4/> Historian [[Jan T. Gross]] estimates that Poles killed 5,000 Germans in 1940-1944 and another 5,000 in the 1944 Warsaw Uprising.<ref name=ref5/> |
|||
'''A+B''' |
|||
'''None''' |
|||
16:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)}} |
|||
'''[[Talk:2019–20 Hong Kong protests#rfc_557175C|Talk:2019–20 Hong Kong protests]]''' |
'''[[Talk:2019–20 Hong Kong protests#rfc_557175C|Talk:2019–20 Hong Kong protests]]''' |
||
{{rfcquote|text= |
{{rfcquote|text= |
||
Line 68: | Line 81: | ||
{{rfcquote|text= |
{{rfcquote|text= |
||
I have been involved in an edit war with {{Reply to|Doc James}} over the question of whether [[alcoholism]] should be included as a complication of alcohol intoxication. My position is that our own article on Alcoholism provides sufficient language to justify the notion that alcohol intoxication leads to alcoholism: subsection [[Alcoholism#Warning_signs]] states that "warning signs of alcoholism include... frequent intoxication," and subsection [[Alcoholism#Definition]] states that "the drinking will increase as more intoxication is required." The other editor insists that listing alcoholism as a risk factor is sufficient, despite the fact that language published by Wikipedia makes clear that additional alcohol intoxication is just as much of a complication—in other words, my position is that alcohol intoxication is BOTH a risk factor for, AND complication of, alcoholism. I'm saying that we should, at the least, classify it as both. [[User:Rowsdower45|Rowsdower45]] ([[User talk:Rowsdower45|talk]]) 05:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)}} |
I have been involved in an edit war with {{Reply to|Doc James}} over the question of whether [[alcoholism]] should be included as a complication of alcohol intoxication. My position is that our own article on Alcoholism provides sufficient language to justify the notion that alcohol intoxication leads to alcoholism: subsection [[Alcoholism#Warning_signs]] states that "warning signs of alcoholism include... frequent intoxication," and subsection [[Alcoholism#Definition]] states that "the drinking will increase as more intoxication is required." The other editor insists that listing alcoholism as a risk factor is sufficient, despite the fact that language published by Wikipedia makes clear that additional alcohol intoxication is just as much of a complication—in other words, my position is that alcohol intoxication is BOTH a risk factor for, AND complication of, alcoholism. I'm saying that we should, at the least, classify it as both. [[User:Rowsdower45|Rowsdower45]] ([[User talk:Rowsdower45|talk]]) 05:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
{{RFC list footer|hist|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
{{RFC list footer|hist|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
Revision as of 21:01, 8 January 2020
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
What should appear in the article:
A. Raymond Taras has provided an estimate of 150,000 for Axis fatalities incurred due to operations by the Polish underground[1] (however, estimates of guerrilla-inflicted casualties often have a wide margin of error[2]). B. According to historian Marcin Zaremba, until 1944 Germans losses in occupied Poland were lower than 3,000.[3][4] Historian Jan T. Gross estimates that Poles killed 5,000 Germans in 1940-1944 and another 5,000 in the 1944 Warsaw Uprising.[5] A+B None 16:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:2019–20 Hong Kong protests
It has been debated whether or not the following information should be included within article 2019–20 Hong Kong protests:
|
Should this information and the corresponding sources be kept or deleted from the article? --1990'sguy (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC) |
Should the second sentence of the last paragraph of the lead be changed from:
The inquiry reported that he withheld military aid and a White House invitation in order to influence Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into his political rivals.
to: The inquiry reported that he withheld military aid and a White House invitation in order to influence Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into a political opponent.
|
Question: Should an infobox be added to this page?
Hopefully we can have a civil and polite conversation.HAL333 22:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC) |
Should we replace the current version with the proposed draft? QuackGuru (talk) 00:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC) |
Should this detail: [1] on Dennis Fuji be retained? RfC relisted by Cunard (talk) at 23:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC) |
Should this page contain information about Sicily? Srnec (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
Should content sourced to books by Petro Grigorenko and Mikhail Schreider be included to this page, with explicit attribution to the authors, as something similar to last paragraph in this section? The book by the Soviet dissident Grigorenko ("One can meet only rats in the underground") was the first of many publications which revealed, among many other things, the existence of Soviet gas vans in 1930s. The book was published in 1981 in New York in Russian, translated to English as "Memoirs" and received many positive reviews: [2], [3][4],[5]. Here is some info about Schredier [6]. My very best wishes (talk) 18:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
Talk:2020 United States presidential election
Hello folks. It has been proposed that the intro to US presidential election articles, be updated. GoodDay (talk) 06:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC) |
Talk:Media bias in the United States
Should the lead contain the following sentence?:
Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |
Do Native Americans belong in the History section? Specifically I would like to know if Little Crow and the section name and history should remain or be deleted. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC) |
Talk:2019 United Kingdom general election
For years irregardless of whether the post-election prime minister was the incumbent or not, we've been using Appointed Prime Minister in the infobox. Recently (in this article) that's been challenged (note: A related dispute occurred at 2019 Canadian federal election concerning incumbent pms, which has since been resolved) as some want the description changed to Prime Minister after election. So which should it be? GoodDay (talk) 14:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
Historian Bruce Pascoe has recently had his Aboriginality questioned by Andrew Bolt. The claim is highly controversial and similar claims by Bolt have landed him in court: Bolt found guilty of race discrimination, the "scandal" is based on a self published blog and is being run by "culture warriors" The Australian and the Herald Sun (both owned by the News Corp). No other mainstream outlets have run the story and the claims made are potentially WP:LIBEL. Are Andrew Bolt and other "culture warriors" reliable sources for Aboriginal identity claims? Bacondrum (talk) 21:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC) |
This is a two-part RfC convened as the result of this discussion at the dispute resolution noticeboard. The RfC concerns the addition of claims regarding various source's views on the location of White Croatia. The first issue concerns the addition of claims attributed to 19th century sources, and the second issue concerns the interpretation of the source Živkovic (2012). A third dispute identified at DRN is contingent on the outcome of the Živkovic dispute, and thus there may be a need for a further RfC once this one is closed. signed, Rosguill talk 04:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC) |
Should we include a brief summary/a summary of the pre-Seljuk Turkic tribes and dynasties and the formation of pre-Seljuk Turkic states in the article about the crusades? Borsoka (talk) 12:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC) |
I have been involved in an edit war with @Doc James: over the question of whether alcoholism should be included as a complication of alcohol intoxication. My position is that our own article on Alcoholism provides sufficient language to justify the notion that alcohol intoxication leads to alcoholism: subsection Alcoholism#Warning_signs states that "warning signs of alcoholism include... frequent intoxication," and subsection Alcoholism#Definition states that "the drinking will increase as more intoxication is required." The other editor insists that listing alcoholism as a risk factor is sufficient, despite the fact that language published by Wikipedia makes clear that additional alcohol intoxication is just as much of a complication—in other words, my position is that alcohol intoxication is BOTH a risk factor for, AND complication of, alcoholism. I'm saying that we should, at the least, classify it as both. Rowsdower45 (talk) 05:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC) |
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Taras2018
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Laqueur
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
ref3
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
ref4
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
ref5
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).