Added: Talk:Romani people in Hungary. |
Added: Talk:Demographics of Eritrea. |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{rfclistintro}} |
{{rfclistintro}} |
||
</noinclude> |
</noinclude> |
||
'''[[Talk:Demographics of Eritrea#rfc_209F27E|Talk:Demographics of Eritrea]]''' |
|||
{{rfcquote|text= |
|||
In [[Demographics of Eritrea]], should the UN DESA 2019 Revision estimate of 3.5 million for the current population of Eritrea (Option 0) be excluded completely; (Option 1) be the only estimate included; or (Option 2) included together (NPOVed) with the estimates of 6 million? [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 17:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)}} |
|||
'''[[Talk:Romani people in Hungary#rfc_995004A|Talk:Romani people in Hungary]]''' |
'''[[Talk:Romani people in Hungary#rfc_995004A|Talk:Romani people in Hungary]]''' |
||
{{rfcquote|text= |
{{rfcquote|text= |
Revision as of 18:01, 5 March 2021
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
In Demographics of Eritrea, should the UN DESA 2019 Revision estimate of 3.5 million for the current population of Eritrea (Option 0) be excluded completely; (Option 1) be the only estimate included; or (Option 2) included together (NPOVed) with the estimates of 6 million? Boud (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC) |
In the article on Hungarian Romani, should a subsection be added at the end of the section on Discrimination, Racism, and Social Exclusion, on Anti-Roma Sentiment? Robert McClenon (talk) 02:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC) |
Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
How should the text in the lead be changed? Idealigic (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC) |
Should Poland be listed as a predecessor or successor in the infobox of Nazi Germany? RFC posted 16:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC) |
Talk:Israel and the apartheid analogy
Julie Peteet is a scholar on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Julie Peteet is cited in paragraph #2 of the lead. The citation reads: Julie Peteet, 2016 p.249 also argues that that there is an Israeli narrative of exceptionalism which works to 'exempt' it from such comparisons.Should this remain in the article? Wikieditor19920 (talk) 23:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC) |
In the infobox 'result', shouldn't it be called a stalemate on the Egyptian front and Syrian loss on the Syrian front? As per the article itself mentions. Ziad Rashad (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC) |
What should this country be referred to as across Wikipedia? Should the example of Eswatini be followed, or Vietnam? Hentheden (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC) |
Talk:Destruction of Kashmiri Shias
Should Genocide of Kashmiri Shias (article title since changed) be merged into Kashmiri Muslims or moved to some other title?TrangaBellam (talk) 15:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC) |
In biographies of historical personalities, should the lead section contain multiple foreign language equivalent names? 77wonders (talk) 09:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC) |
Should the following term "Gandhara" be changed to "Eastern Afghanistan" ? PashtoPromoter (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |
Should this statement [1] about the genetic history of the Uyghur people be included in the article? Hzh (talk) 03:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |
Talk:Libyan Crisis (2011–present)
After the end of the Civil War, the formation of the government and the adoption of the joint budget of Libya, can we say that the war crisis is over? What date for the end of the crisis should be in the title: 2020 (signing of a permanent truce) or 2021 (adoption of a unified budget)? MarcusTraianus (talk) 08:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC) |
Editors have been arguing about L. L. Zamenhof's nationality/ethnicity/citizenship for many years. Should we do the following?
A similar approach has been taken in relation to Nicolaus Copernicus and Al-Farabi. Khiikiat (talk) 01:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC) |
@Mr anonymous username, Ianmacm, Marc Raphael Felix, and John Maynard Friedman: I also think that a comparison to the SARS-COV-2 virus outbreak is valuable and it will be appreciated by our readers. So I propose to add the following sentence to Comparison with other pandemics section. The numbers will be updated automatically, as it does in Covid article :
We could use WHO's COVID website as a source for the citation. What do you think ? Alexcalamaro (talk) 07:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC) |
The three questions below relate to the first paragraph of the lead, and how/if to present the "bantustan" analogy described regarding the proposed enclaves and racially segregated areas in apartheid South Africa. For those new to the discussion, please feel free to review the prior move discussion, which resulted in an article title change from "Palestinian bantustans" to "Palestinian enclaves."
Question 1: Should the lead make mention of the bantustans analogy? Question 2: If yes to Q1, which one of the following three versions should be used to describe the analogy? (These are drawn from the prior three versions of the sentence present in the article. Please feel free to suggest slightly modified wording, but it would be helpful to indicate which is your closest preference based on the versions below.)
Question 3: Should "bantustans" be bolded as an alternative title? Wikieditor19920 (talk) 03:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
Talk:Los Angeles Police Department
Should the lead note include 2-3 sentences that the LAPD has (1) a history of corruption, brutality and discriminatory policing, (2) a 2000 DOJ investigation found rampant racism, police brutality, and police corruption within the LAPD, and (3) the LAPD was subsequently placed under federal oversight from 2001 to 2013? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC) |
While Indonesia has a lot of events in the last decade, Should the latest info of the country only talking around 2004 tsunami (17 years ago) event, or should it be renewed? NouVa (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC) |
Due to persistent dispute over this issue, should Russia's human rights situation and/or government corruption be elaborated upon in the lead section of this article? Suggestions below.--DeathTrain (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC) |
Should the article's intro include as notable the number of times the Tetragrammaton is in the original texts? 24.78.228.96 (talk) 11:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
Can Crusading be used interchangeably with Crusades if used in a grammatically correct way—Yes or No?
For example, the opening sentence of the lead is Crusading was a series of religious wars, sanctioned by the Latin Church, that began in the Middle Ages and continued to be fought in several subsequent centuries. A GOCE review has passed the grammar, Wikidictionary defines Crusading as the present participle of Crusade, no one would seriously deny the truth of the sentence and it is supported by multiple sources referring to the Crusades in the Crusading#Definition section.Norfolkbigfish (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
A recent & continuing dispute at 2020 United States House of Representatives elections, has highlighted a discrepancy. When we +/− for seats won in an election infobox, do we use the base # of seats from the previous election or from the current seats count. Example: at 2020 US House elections - Do we subtract from Democrats totals 235 (2018 elections) or 232 seats, right before 2020 elections? GoodDay (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
Wikipedia guidelines regarding names for geographical places per WP:NCGN#Alternative names and MOS:BOLDLEAD state that significant alternative names (representing 10% or more of available English literature on the place) should be in boldface in the lead section.
The inclusion and status of Armenian-language "Shushi" as a significant alternative name for this article was extensively discussed on this talk page previously: [2] [3]. In short: There is a vast amount of sourced material on this article utilizing "Shushi" and which relates to the town's Armenian history and heritage. By utilizing search engine tests for Google and Google Scholar, Shushi seems quite prominent and the results exceed 10% as WP:NCGN requires. According to WP:NCGN, search engine tests are permissible to utilize (such as for multiple local names), despite their issues as far as I've gathered. Taking all this into account - the issue of this RfC is therefore if it's prudent to display "Shushi" in boldface in the lead section. AntonSamuel (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
Talk:The Last Narc (TV series)
Recent changes [4] now describe the 2020 Amazon docuseries The Last Narc (TV series) as "fictional" in WP:WIKIVOICE, mostly based on links to primary documents from the 1990s housed at http://www.reneverdugo.org.
Furthermore, a one-paragraph "background" section has been proposed (see text here [5]), using academic and newspaper sources that don't reference The Last Narc, but are on the same topic and present similar conclusions.
Comments are appreciated. -Darouet (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Should we delete succession box content such as the following? Examples: "Oldest-living British prime minister". What say all of you? GoodDay (talk) 21:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC) |