Jaysuschris (talk | contribs) |
m Whack jobs |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
''All'' signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to [[Wikipedia talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this page's discussion page]]. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page. |
''All'' signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to [[Wikipedia talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this page's discussion page]]. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page. |
||
==The above is a rant of a Right Wing Republican Nut Case== |
|||
I maintain that this poster is a right wing Republican nut case vandal. See [[Jim Nussle]]. |
|||
While I have been wicked with wicked Jim Nussle, Jesus Christ has been whack jobbing himself. |
|||
I might also mention my 2500 edits, and the 1,500 EB 1911 edits which have disappeared. --[[User:FourthAve|FourthAve]] 10:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:48, 3 March 2006
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 09:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 17:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC).
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
Statement of the dispute
FourthAve has engaged in what I see as personal attacks, obscenity, vandalism, and retaliatory, bad-faith warnings.
Description
FourthAve has continually personally attacked other editors involved in Bob Vander Plaats, Jim Nussle, and University of Dubuque. His edits include calling Nussle's wife some variant of "slut" and the president of University of Dubuque "evil". Any attempt to remove such language is met with personal attacks. While any political article is going to involve disagreements and the occasional POV problems, FourthAve's conduct goes beyond the acceptable threshold. I did not want it to come to this, but after receiving regular taunts to "Go cry to an admin" I thought it was time.
Evidence of disputed behavior
This is an abbreviated list.
- Personal attack
- Personal attack
- Personal attack
- Personal attack (unsigned)
- Retaliatory, bad-faith warning
- Obscenity/vandalism (sexually derrogatory language)
- Vandalism
- Vandalism
- "Minor Edits" for every edit regardless of whether it is minor
- Personal attack when notified of this RfC
Applicable policies
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}
(sign with ~~~~)
- Jaysus Chris 09:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Other users who endorse this summary
(sign with ~~~~)
Response
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section. {Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Outside view
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.
The above is a rant of a Right Wing Republican Nut Case
I maintain that this poster is a right wing Republican nut case vandal. See Jim Nussle.
While I have been wicked with wicked Jim Nussle, Jesus Christ has been whack jobbing himself.
I might also mention my 2500 edits, and the 1,500 EB 1911 edits which have disappeared. --FourthAve 10:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)