ZooPro
(talk page)
(0/0/0); Scheduled to end You're almost there. All you need to do now is substitute the time parser function (it isn't as scary as it sounds, edit the page and inline comments will guide you). This will generate a fixed end time. Remove the <!--
and -->
around subst:
in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.
Nomination
ZooPro (talk · contribs) – This will be my fourth admin request (my last being over 12 months ago), I have been here for a while now and in my time here I have participated in most aspects of Wikipedia, I am the current Co-ordinator of WikiProject Animals and WikiProject Zoo. I helped develop the zoo portal and I help maintain the Animals, Amphibians and Reptiles, Mammals and Zoo Portals. I currently hold the Rollback, Reviewer and File Mover flags. I wish to note RfA is in my opinion the most pathetic and disgraceful part of Wikipedia, it really has become a joke, some editors that participate on here are sadistic and deserve to be banned. I am willing to go through this "bloodbath" for the sake of working towards a better Wikipedia. If you wish to be harsh expect me to be harsh back, if you attack my edits be sure that if you have ever done the same I will find it and point it out. I have seen far too many great editors led to the slaughter at RfA and not survived. Don’t bother to oppose my nomination and then state "per above" how about instead you grow some and tell me what you think and why you don’t trust me? I will be blatant and honest, I will act here as I act everywhere on Wikipedia, a duck is a duck. I make mistakes, as do we all. I have been blocked once, get over it. If I fail I will not retire or disappear for a few weeks/months because I enjoy working on Wikipedia and an extra user right won’t change that, I don’t edit to please others. My request for the mop is not an attempt at praise or recognition, I don’t need other users to tell me I am doing a good job because I know I am, I perform hundreds of edits that no one has ever or likely will ever notice, most of them are related to the WikiProjects. If you hate me or even dislike me that’s fine with me but don’t use that as an excuse to oppose my RfA, there is plenty of users who annoy the crap out of me yet I trust them with the tool. If you are a user who has participated in every (or near enough) RfA in the last 6 months and have done nothing but opposed, get a life and go edit some articles; you make up the main toxic core editors who make RfA what it is and YOU are responsible for this horrible process. RfA voting is pretty easy, if you trust my edits then Support me, If you dont then Oppose me simple. If you ask me an "Optional" question remember it is just that, For users who decided to change their votes because of the answers I provide that’s a piss weak act, grow a spine look at my edits and actions for my entire edit history then give your vote. I know this opening seems negative but it is in fact the view of the community in general regarding RfA I am just putting it all in one place. I will not stand around my computer for hours ready to answer any questions or criticisms in 30 seconds or less because I have a real life, I will check in nightly though. Cheers ZooPro 08:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
- Links for ZooPro: ZooPro (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for ZooPro can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral