support vote |
Masssiveego (talk | contribs) →[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Martinp23|Martinp23]]: inexperience oppose |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
#'''Weak oppose''' - per [[user:CrazyInSane|CrazyInSane]] --[[User:T-rex|T-rex]] 01:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
#'''Weak oppose''' - per [[user:CrazyInSane|CrazyInSane]] --[[User:T-rex|T-rex]] 01:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
#'''Oppose'''. Please read through [[WP:RFA/ST]] to get an idea of what most people's standards are, I don't consider [[User:Themindset/RFA|mine]] that difficult to attain. [[User:Themindset|Themindset]] 02:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
#'''Oppose'''. Please read through [[WP:RFA/ST]] to get an idea of what most people's standards are, I don't consider [[User:Themindset/RFA|mine]] that difficult to attain. [[User:Themindset|Themindset]] 02:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
#'''Oppose''' Fails my criteria. --[[User:Masssiveego|Masssiveego]] 04:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
;Neutral |
;Neutral |
Revision as of 04:41, 14 August 2006
Martinp23
(6/4/4) Ending 20:07, 2006-08-20 (UTC)
Martinp23 (talk · contribs) – I've been on Wikipedia for quite a while now, and although I was quite inactive on my registered account for a while after first registering it, I'm pretty sure that in that time, and before getting a registered account, I was making smaller anonymous edits. Recently, I've been doing comparatively little work on articles themselves, being more concerned with primarily reverting vandalism, and also wading through WP:AFC (when I have access to a tabbed browser), welcoming new users and doing NP patrol. I've recently been on a wikibreak, which will account for my recent breaks in contribution (I had no access to a PC :( ). Although perhaps relatively inexperienced in terms of edit counts to other users, I feel that I know as much about anti vandalism and my other wikignomish pursuits as those with much greater edit counts. To this end, I feel that I could make as much use of Admin tools as users with higher edit counts than myself, using the tools to clear speedy deletion backlogs, block vandals, carry out moves quickly and efficiently and (most importantly for me) clear backlogs of images and media to be deleted. Thanks for reading my nom, and I welcome all comments. Martinp23 18:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept - self nom Martinp23 19:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A: I'd first like to go through Category:Images_and_media_for_deletion and delete what needs to be deleted. As well as doing this, I'd help to keep on top of speedy deletions and XfD noms, as well as keeping on top of WP:AIV, although this seems to be kept on top of quite well anyway at the moment. In my spare moments (!), I'd like to really get involved in dispute resolution as an administrator, using protection powers to cool down disputes. Finally, I'd use additional admin tools to help with page moves.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A: I am pleased with my anti-vandalism work across wikipedia, and would like to continue with this in the future. I think that it is extremely important to encourage new users to come to wikipedia and contribute, but unfortunately wikipedia's current speedy deletion process deletes the first contributions of many new users, and the impersonality of the SD notices can drive users away permanently. To try to combat this, I have created a template message which I hope will help to encourage genuine users to stay Template:Firstarticle.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I have been in conflicts on wikipedia - most often only when I have invited myself into them using WP:3O. The most infamous of these (in my opinion) was the mess at Sculpture of Ancient Greece, which eventually resulted in an RfC for one of the main proponents in the dispute (brought by another user) to which I contributed. (The RfC was for Ste4k - now banned). I want to try to resolve disputes rather than cause them, an ambition which administrative powers would help me with (for issuing 3RR bans and page protections).
- Comments
- See Martinp23's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.
- Edit Count Using Interiot's Tool 2 alphaChimp laudare 20:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Username | Martinp23 |
---|---|
Total edits | 1743 |
Distinct pages edited | 1018 |
Average edits/page | 1.712 |
First edit | 08:33, January 30, 2006 |
(main) | 609 |
Talk | 50 |
User | 170 |
User talk | 631 |
Image | 3 |
Template | 6 |
Category | 3 |
Wikipedia | 264 |
Wikipedia talk | 5 |
Portal | 2 |
- Support
- Support - though he does not meet my requirement of 300+ project-space edits, his answers to the questions and his nomination paragraph make me want to support him. Kalani [talk] 20:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support. DarthVader 23:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Somewhat low on the experience end of things, but I don't see that as a compelling reason to oppose in this case. Seems like someone who would make good use of the tools. --Aguerriero (talk) 23:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Has been active for 3+ months, has 1500+ edits including plenty in project and talk spaces. Everything I see is good. Eluchil404 00:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support, I still no reason why he should be an admin. His number of edits may be a little low but this editor has shown he understands policy and as a result edit number is unimportant. SorryGuy
- Support, I have been temporarily cured of the flu!--Andeh 01:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Has a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Weak oppose as fails my personal standards in terms of edits. I would have done a neutral, but someone has to start. Please see Viridae's comments below. Ifnord 23:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose not quite ready yet. I would definitely give my support with a few more months' contributions and a non-self nomination. — `CRAZY`(IN)`SANE` 23:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Edits need to be boosted. They are a reflection of experience. AdamBiswanger1 23:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- weak oppose Seems like a good editor, but with just 1700 edits and (essentially) only 3 months editing, its a bit early to tell. come back soon! --heah 00:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - per CrazyInSane --T-rex 01:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Please read through WP:RFA/ST to get an idea of what most people's standards are, I don't consider mine that difficult to attain. Themindset 02:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Fails my criteria. --Masssiveego 04:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral
- Neutral leaning oppose however. Seems to inexperienced and a self-nomination. Relatively small amount of contributions (little over 600 mainspace edits) and only been here since the end of January 2006 after which the nominee states he was initially inactive for a considerable time (began contributing actively since April 2006). [1] It will take alot to change me from turning to oppose.--Jersey Devil 22:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral I like your contributions and I can see no reason to oppose. You have involvement with AFDs and lots of RC patrol. I just don't think you have been contributing at this level for long enough. Keep it up, come back in a couple of months And I would be happy to support you. ViridaeTalk 23:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral leaning Support I do think some more experience (in the form of editing across all spaces) is necessary, but the candidate has a great track record of vandalism reversion, and the extra buttons would enable to him to be even more effective in that respect. The candidate (like all RfA candidates) is to be commended in asking for the extra responsibility, as he/she has demonstrated an eager willingness to further help the project hoopydinkConas tá tú? 23:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral leaning Support also - Hoopydink took the words out of my mouth; and will probably change my vote upon newer questions. I will add that my personal interactions with Martin have been very
populargrr... positive - I just cant believe this is his 23rd RfA! ;) - Glen 01:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)