m →Nomination: -move |
m +altacc |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I've seen a lot of DeltaQuad since his last nomination. A lot of the attitude I like to see from admins, intelligent, yet willing to listen and learn. Willingness to realise when he's he's made a mistake and to correct it. His work at SPI is good, and in my opinion, it's time he passed an RFA. I hope you'll agree. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 21:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC) |
I've seen a lot of DeltaQuad since his last nomination. A lot of the attitude I like to see from admins, intelligent, yet willing to listen and learn. Willingness to realise when he's he's made a mistake and to correct it. His work at SPI is good, and in my opinion, it's time he passed an RFA. I hope you'll agree. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 21:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. --> I accept. Thanks Courcelles for the nomination. |
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. --> I accept. Thanks Courcelles for the nomination. -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="red"> (t) ]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad| (e)]]</font></font></font> |
||
⚫ | |||
====Questions for the candidate==== |
====Questions for the candidate==== |
||
Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
* Links for DeltaQuad: {{usercheck-short|DeltaQuad}} |
* Links for DeltaQuad: {{usercheck-short|DeltaQuad}} |
||
* Edit summary usage for DeltaQuad can be found <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~mathbot/cgi-bin/wp/rfa/edit_summary.cgi?user=DeltaQuad&lang=en here]</span>. |
* Edit summary usage for DeltaQuad can be found <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~mathbot/cgi-bin/wp/rfa/edit_summary.cgi?user=DeltaQuad&lang=en here]</span>. |
||
⚫ | |||
* |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may comment in the "support", "oppose" or "neutral" sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the "general comments" and "discussion" sections. --> |
<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may comment in the "support", "oppose" or "neutral" sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the "general comments" and "discussion" sections. --> |
Revision as of 19:41, 11 May 2011
DeltaQuad
(talk page)
(0/0/0); Scheduled to end You're almost there. All you need to do now is substitute the time parser function (it isn't as scary as it sounds, edit the page and inline comments will guide you). This will generate a fixed end time. Remove the <!--
and -->
around subst:
in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.
Nomination
DeltaQuad (talk · contribs) – This is a little strange for me. You see, around ten months ago, I opposed this candidate. In the ten months since DeltaQuad was last here, he's picked up a lot of seasoning. The daily grind of clerking the SPI casepages is an environment where experience is gained in spades. He has coded and operates the current iteration of the UAA reporting bot, which identifies potentally problematic usernames as they are created. As much as I like my admin candidates to have extensive experience with content (and DQ does have some), adminship boils down to a lot of boring work that must get done, and making DeltaQuad an admin will be of great help in getting the maintenance tasks that he has chosen to throw himself into.
I've seen a lot of DeltaQuad since his last nomination. A lot of the attitude I like to see from admins, intelligent, yet willing to listen and learn. Willingness to realise when he's he's made a mistake and to correct it. His work at SPI is good, and in my opinion, it's time he passed an RFA. I hope you'll agree. Courcelles 21:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. Thanks Courcelles for the nomination. -- DQ (t) (e)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I intend to be most active (as my contributions show) at Sockpuppet investigations. This is the core of where I have been and have made multiple administrative requests. I also intend to stop by Usernames for administrator attention especially with my bot posting suspicious usernames. Furthermore, Administrator Intervention Against Vandalism would be another spot to stop, as I do still do anti vandalism work every so often. Lastly patrolling the Open Proxy noticeboard which is only actively patrolled by one admin. -- DQ (t) (e)
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: My admin recommendations at SPI and the archiving. That way admins can just look over, verify what I have said, and take action. The archival is a key part of SPI and is why my edit count is so high in that namespace. Reviewing each of the cases I archive for errors or things missed is a key part of it, but also making sure that the case thread stays clear for new cases and it doesn't become a mile long list of socks. -- DQ (t) (e)
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Content disputes, not really. Conflicts, some, minor. The stress of knowing if the user you see on the screen is a sockpuppet, yes. It's sometimes really hard to know if you have a sock. I deal with that by talking with other admins/users about it and sometimes, just walking away and coming back to look at it later. That's the way I plan to do the same in the future. -- DQ (t) (e)
General comments
- Links for DeltaQuad: DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for DeltaQuad can be found here.
- Alternate Account Disclosure -- DQ (t) (e) 19:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral