→Backlog: rm frequency analysis - moved |
|||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
==[[29 April]] [[2008]]== |
==[[29 April]] [[2008]]== |
||
<!--Please place new requests at the TOP of the list, with a blank line between separate requests--> |
<!--Please place new requests at the TOP of the list, with a blank line between separate requests--> |
||
*'''[[:A World Without Jews]] → [[:On the Jewish Question]]''' —(''[[Talk:A World Without Jews#Requested move|Discuss]]'')— usual name --[[User:Schwalker|Schwalker]] ([[User talk:Schwalker|talk]]) 09:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*'''[[:SourceForge]] → [[:SourceForge (disambiguation)]]''' —(''[[Talk:SourceForge#Requested move|Discuss]]'')— Most of the inbound links to [[SourceForge]] really should go to [[SourceForge.net]]. I would also argue that most people who are looking up SourceForge except to see information on SourceForge.net, rather than the company or software that powers the site. It thus makes sense to me to move this article to [[SourceForge (disambiguation)]] and then redirect SourceForge to SourceForge.net. --[[User:Andareed|Andareed]] ([[User talk:Andareed|talk]]) 04:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC) |
*'''[[:SourceForge]] → [[:SourceForge (disambiguation)]]''' —(''[[Talk:SourceForge#Requested move|Discuss]]'')— Most of the inbound links to [[SourceForge]] really should go to [[SourceForge.net]]. I would also argue that most people who are looking up SourceForge except to see information on SourceForge.net, rather than the company or software that powers the site. It thus makes sense to me to move this article to [[SourceForge (disambiguation)]] and then redirect SourceForge to SourceForge.net. --[[User:Andareed|Andareed]] ([[User talk:Andareed|talk]]) 04:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:23, 29 April 2008
Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.
Please read the article titling policy and the guideline regarding primary topics before moving a page or requesting a page move.
Any autoconfirmed user can use the Move function to perform most moves (see Help:How to move a page). If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:
- Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. See: § Requesting technical moves.
- Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
- A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
- Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.
Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus to move the page is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will carry out the request. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion may be closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.
Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.
When not to use this page
Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:
- Making an uncontroversial move – if you can, be bold and do it yourself! If you can't, see § Requesting technical moves.
- Renaming a category – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
- Renaming a stub template – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
- Renaming an image or other file – see Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving a file page.
- Moves from draft namespace or user space to article space – Unconfirmed users: add
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Confirmed users: Move the page yourself. - Merging two articles – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, or be bold and do it yourself.
- Splitting an article – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed article splits, or be bold and do it yourself.
- Requesting that page histories be merged – list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
- Contesting a move request close – use the Wikipedia:Move review process.
Undiscussed moves
Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:
- No article exists at the new target title;
- There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
- It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.
If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.
Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.
Uncontroversial proposals
Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required.
If you object to a proposal listed here, please re-list it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.
- Love You (The Beach Boys album) → Love You (album) — Extra disambiguation isn't needed, but current page redirects to an older article title. — = ∫tc 5th Eye 02:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Incomplete and contested proposals
With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move request, please do not discuss move requests here. If you support an incomplete or contested move request, please consider following the instructions above to create a full move request, and move the discussion to the "Other Proposals" section below. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.
*Herbert Baxter Adams prize → Herbert Baxter Adams Prize ("P" is part of official name.) Ludvikus (talk) 00:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Uncontested - Moved Up
- Emilio Estevez → Emilio Estévez, Renée Estevez → Renée Estévez - the name is spelt with the accent above the 'e', and is spelt that way throughout the articles (see also Ramón Estévez. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 13:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- No discussion area created for either page. Reliable sources do not use the accent, including Renée Estevez's own website: [1]. Ramón Estévez's article started out without accent before an anonymous Spanish IP made edits last year.[2] Horsesforcorses (talk) 14:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, whatever the outcome, the name needs to be consistent through the articles Emilio Estévez, Renée Estévez, Ramón Estévez, Joe Estévez, Charlie Sheen and Martin Sheen. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- No discussion area created for either page. Reliable sources do not use the accent, including Renée Estevez's own website: [1]. Ramón Estévez's article started out without accent before an anonymous Spanish IP made edits last year.[2] Horsesforcorses (talk) 14:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Portal:Military of the United States/U.S. Military Officer Rank Badges → Portal:Military of the United States/U.S. Uniformed Service Officer Rank Badges — The United States has seven uniformed services that commission officers and these ranks don't just apply to the armed forces. —Neovu79 (talk) 00:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Locked-In syndrome → Locked-in syndrome —(Discuss)— UpToDate and MEDLINE database searches show that this syndrome is seldom, if ever, capitalized. The page 'Locked-in syndrome' has already been created as a redirect page, so I am not allowed to move the existing article to the correct capitalization.--Jmjanzen (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- spin triplet → triplet state I am contesting the move of spin triplet to triplet state and related moves. User 87.194.39.42 has been harassing me about a triplet state redirect (when it was still a redirect) to diradical and was even blocked, see [3] and [4]. It seems not possible to have a decent discussion about this issue. V8rik (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Muhammad's wives → Mother of the Believers — {Discussion} — Article discussion has taken place and consensus has been achieved to move it to the more common term based in Islamic usage. — Tigeroo (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)--Tigeroo (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Where is this discussion? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I believe Tigeroo means this section, but he seems simply to have posted, and taken quiet for consent. I find this quite controversial; the proposed title smacks of WP:Official names, and will be obscure to the general reader of English. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- He meant Talk:Muhammad's wives#Muhammad's wives and Mother of the Believers merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I believe Tigeroo means this section, but he seems simply to have posted, and taken quiet for consent. I find this quite controversial; the proposed title smacks of WP:Official names, and will be obscure to the general reader of English. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Where is this discussion? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Other proposals
- A World Without Jews → On the Jewish Question —(Discuss)— usual name --Schwalker (talk) 09:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- SourceForge → SourceForge (disambiguation) —(Discuss)— Most of the inbound links to SourceForge really should go to SourceForge.net. I would also argue that most people who are looking up SourceForge except to see information on SourceForge.net, rather than the company or software that powers the site. It thus makes sense to me to move this article to SourceForge (disambiguation) and then redirect SourceForge to SourceForge.net. --Andareed (talk) 04:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gogmagog (band) → Gogmagog —(Discuss)— only article with name - no disambiguation needed --B.Wind (talk) 01:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gogmagog redirects to Gog and Magog. Looking at that article compared to Gogmagog (band), I'd say that it's good the way it is now. Grsztalk 01:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Java (Sun) → Java (software platform) —(Discuss)— Relisting with the alternative name proposed in discussion --Andrewa (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Conservative Party (UK) → Conservative and Unionist Party —(Discuss)— To give the page title the actual name of the party in question, to remove an unnecessary dab at the end --Breadandcheese (talk) 23:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Worcester → Worcester, Worcestershire —(Discuss)— The town of Worcester, Worcestershire is simply not the primary topic for "Worcester", as Worcester, Massachusetts receives an average of over 5,000 readers more per month even with the UK city being located at Worcester. Since there is no primary topic, "Worcester" being the location of the disambiguation page is optimal. The current location of the articles is not in line with Wikipedia's naming conventions, as the UK town is not the unambiguous meaning of "Worcester" for the majority of readers. --Rai•me 21:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Soumbala → Sumbala —(Discuss)— Soumbala is the French transcription of a Manding word sumbala or sunbala or sometimes sungala that is also used in other languages of western West Africa (e.g., sumbala in Fula). In English it is common to see "sumbala," though "soumbala" is also seen (some of the instances are actually mirrors of the current Wikipedia article). --A12n (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC) --A12n (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Centrifugal force (fictitious) → Centrifugal force —(Discuss)— Moved a few days ago with no real consensus. This force is always called centrifugal force; that it is 'fictitious' does not need to be part of the title. The way, the truth, and the light (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gawler railway line, Adelaide → Gawler Central railway line, Adelaide —(Discuss)— The line is referred to by the operator as the Gawler Central line as it terminates at Gawler Central Station, which is in the suburb of Gawler. The other line in Adelaide with a similar name has an article titled Noarlunga Centre railway line, Adelaide instead of just "Noarlunga railway line, Adelaide" I should note. Second time a move has been proposed (see talk page). --Somebody in the WWW (talk) 13:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Сommunications in Austria → Communications in Austria —(Discuss)— The current title starts with a cyrillic С instead of a latin C. That should be changed. --Prince Kassad (talk) 10:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gog (disambiguation) → Gog —(Discuss)— move to appropriate name - no article at proposed destination —B.Wind (talk) 03:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: GOG is also a
disambiguation pageredirect after merge with Gog (disambiguation). B.Wind (talk) 03:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: GOG is also a
- Magog (disambiguation) → Magog —(Discuss)— move to appropriate name - current target only a redirect that should be a dab page —B.Wind (talk) 03:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Manufacturing Belt (U.S. region) → Rust Belt —(Discuss)— Wikipedia:Naming conventions seems to me to clearly and explicitly say that the most common name in use should be used as the article's title, regardless of what may be the "official" or "formal" name. Several editors have pointed out that "Rust Belt" is FAR more commonly used, and in fact is what the majority of the references cited in the article call it. —Shawisland (talk) 00:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Indo-Colombian relations → Colombia-India relations —(Discuss)— Someone change it without proposing it at the talk... I think is more neutral to keep the actual name of the countries and by alphabetical order —Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 23:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Historical revisionism → Revisionism —(Discuss)— Move to the non-pejorative usage —Ashanda (talk) 20:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- UNIT → Unified Intelligence Taskforce —(Discuss)— UNIT is an abbreviation, and the old name is out of date. —U-Mos (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- FC Kaisar → FC Kaisar Kyzylorda —(Discuss)— Official name —BanRay 10:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hussain sagar → Hussain Sagar —(Discuss)— Wrong capitalization. page with the correct capitalization redirects. Hence this mess. —Σαι ( Talk) 09:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Liga I → Romanian Liga —(Discuss)— There is two many 1. Liga and XXX Liga, The full name of the Romanian highest division is Liga I Bürger, it may be confused with Soproni Liga, Corgoň Liga, Gambrinus liga, Swiss 1. Liga and various Prva Liga. Use Romanian Liga per Portuguese Liga case. —Matthew_hk tc 06:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Matthew_hk tc 06:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gambrinus liga → Czech Liga —(Discuss)— Gambrinus is the sponsor name, the name was known as Gambrinus 1. Liga or 1. česká fotbalová liga. Although česká fotbalová liga is another thing, the title of the highest division should be Czech Liga, as per Portuguese Liga. —Matthew_hk tc 06:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Matthew_hk tc 06:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Auritz / Burguete → Burguete —(Discuss)— More common name in English, as made famous by Hemingway. —Biruitorul (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Fish processing vessel → Factory ship —(Discuss)— "Factory ship" is the usual name for this type of vessel —Geronimo20 (talk) 21:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- BMW (motorcycles) → BMW Motorrad —(Discuss)— The name of the BMW subsidiary is BMW Motorrad, I believe the subject matter of this article is the Mototorcycle manufacturer, not the motorcycles and the title should reflect that —Chris Ssk talk 10:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC) — Relisting to attempt consensus. Andrewa (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Saturn VUE → Saturn Vue —(Discuss)— MOS-TM guidelines on capitalization —Fatsamsgrandslam (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- England national football team managers → England national football team manager —(Discuss)— The title of this article does not follow the standard format of singular titles for articles about a position. For instance President of the United States, which is an article mainly about the position itself, though it does of course include information about the men who have held the office. There are numerous other examples. The main argument against the move is that "we have better things to do." I really don't think there's any reason other than that, and I don't think it is a particularly burdensome task to move the article, so we should move it. —-- Grant.Alpaugh 10:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ohio State University → The Ohio State University —(Discuss)— In light of the recent move of AFC Wimbledon to its proper name, I think that this article should also be moved for the same reason. The Ohio State University is the proper, legal name used by the University in all of its officially released information. The fact that we have a common format for "XYZ State University" should not matter if it leads to the article being given an incorrect title. Whenever possible we should call things by their proper names, and this name is well known enough to not create problems. Also, we can link Ohio State University to The Ohio State University in the same way that we currently do the inverse. I see no reason why we shouldn't make this move. —-- Grant.Alpaugh 09:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- MTV ® → MTV R —(Discuss)— We shouldn't have the registered trademark symbol in any titles (well, except for ®), but especially not here, where it's being used a poor substitute for the network's logo. It's also confusing to people who might think it just means MTV, which is of course a registered trademark. ——Chowbok ☠ 02:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- The Union (U.P.Y.O.U.R.S) → The Union (professional wrestling) —(Discuss)— Current name is awkward and new one would fit better into the wider naming scheme used in other pro wrestling articles. —DrWarpMind (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Bolzano → Bolzano (city) —(Discuss)— Bernard Bolzano receives about 1/2 as much traffic as current Bolzano, so Bolzano should probably be a disambiguation page, or a redirect to the disambiguation page at Bolzano (disambiguation) —Sapphic (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC) --Sapphic (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Rear admiral (United States) → Rear Admiral (United States) —(Discuss)— To conform with the other United States military rank articles on Wikipedia. Wiki:MOSCAPS Lists military ranks in two distinct general uses. I am trying to get a consensus for the article name. —Neovu79 (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- These two fromer towns were moved to new namespaces on the misconception that they were about neighbourhoods of the city of Edmonton. They are actually about the histories of these towns before annexation. For both of them there are seperate articles for the present-day neighbouhoods that occupy the area the towns once did. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 19:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Brisbane Cricket Ground → The Gabba —(Discuss)— Discussion and consensus here and here. —dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Renaissance in the Netherlands → Renaissance in the Low Countries —(Discuss)— The current article is not limited to the Netherlands in English usage, since it discusses both the southern and northern Netherlands. The most common and clearest alternative is the use of Low Countries as a broad geographic base that includes Flanders, the northern provinces and some of the other regions that played an important role in the period (also see Netherlands (terminology)). In English, the Netherlands (without further conditions) refers to a country that does not yet exist during the period discussed and much (most, actually) of the discussion is for areas beyond its borders. —Stomme (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- The Wicker Man → The Wicker Man (1973 film) —(Discuss)— Nobody has provided any proof on why this should be the primary topic. As the article notes, it largely slipped into obscurity but it has won a few awards. Article statistics from March show an average of about 1162 hits a day [5], minus an avg. of 205 hits [6] because people check the dab page as they didn't find the right one. In contrast, the 2006 film remake got about 745 hits a day [7], which matches up very strongly against the 1973 film (about 957), indicating that the 1973 film does not significantly outrank other instances of TWM. I therefore suggest creating a primary disambiguation page without the (disambiguation) unless someone has a good reason for keeping the 1973 film as the primary title —hbdragon88 (talk) 06:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Grand Tour: Disaster in Time → Timescape (1992 film) -(Discuss) - This particular film's title has been under contention, and was released under two separate titles: Grand Tour: Disaster in Time for cable, and Timescape for home video. Also, IMDB lists the film under the primary title of Timescpae, and I would think that more people would know the film under the released version. Zidel333 (talk) 02:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Everything's Eventual: 14 Dark Tales → Everything's Eventual —(Discuss)— The descriptive title "14 Dark Tales" is not part of the actual title of the book. Jmj713 (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Guaranteed minimum income → Basic income —(Discuss)— Basic income is the universally accepted name for what is described in this article. Guaranteed minimum income (gmi) is not adequate, since a gmi can be conditional as in the case of Romania (community service).[8] —Guido den Broeder (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Desert Eagle → Magnum Research Desert Eagle —(Discuss)— See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Firearms#Naming for naming conventions this article should have the manufactures name before the name of the pistol. —MRIanthony (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Figurehead (metaphor) → Figurehead —(Discuss)— This is by far the most common use of the word 'figurehead' today. Additionally, the article about the metaphor could be expanded considerably. —16:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Melekeh → Jerusalem stone —(Discuss)— Evidence indicates that "Jerusalem stone" is by far the most common term in English; "melekeh" is being pushed as something of an official name. This has been moved back and forth once already. —Mangoe (talk) 15:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Aztec sun stone → Aztec calendar stone —(Discuss)— Inaccurate though it may be, "calendar stone" still seems to be the most common name. —Ptcamn (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Eric Lerner → The Big Bang Never Happened —(Discuss)— Per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Lerner. ScienceApologist (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Backlog
Move dated sections here after five days have passed (June 16 or older).
- Harry Johnson → Harry J —(Discuss)— Since he is more popularly known as "Harry J". (After the move, please also move Harry Johnson (disambiguation) to Harry Johnson, since there are many people named "Harry Johnson", and it's doubtful the record producer is dominantly the most famous. Chanheigeorge (talk) 08:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- MacDonald Dettwiler → MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates —(Discuss)— Full name of company, which uses MDA as main brand. —TheMightyQuill (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Rose Pipette → Rose Dougall —(Discuss)— "Rose Pipette" was a band alias whilst she was in The Pipettes. She has since parted ways with the band so switching back to her actual, real name (Rose Dougall) would make sense Pullshapes (talk) 16:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC) —Pullshapes (talk) 16:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gdańsk law → Danzig law —(Discuss)— Original title of 2004, and according to the Danzig/Gdansk vote which requires the use of Danzig for the 1308-1945 period. — Matthead Discuß 02:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Prince Philippe, Duke of Brabant → Philippe, Duke of Brabant —(Discuss)— Following the example of other heirs to the throne, Philippe and Mathilde's titles should just be Philippe/Mathilde, Duke/Duchess of Brabant. —Morhange (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Morhange (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Peter Mogila → Petro Mohyla —(Discuss)— Currently, Petro Mohyla is the most commonly used name. Historically, Peter Mogila was common. Petro Mohyla is a transliteration form Ukrainian. Peter Mogila is a transliteration from Russian. The person was a Metropolitan of Kiev. —Greggerr (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Occupation of the Baltic republics by Nazi Germany → Occupation of the Baltic states by Nazi Germany —(Discuss)— Current title is not inline with current usage in the sources, per WP:COMMONNAME —Martintg (talk) 09:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Tomislav II of Croatia, 4th Duke of Aosta → Aimone, 4th Duke of Aosta —(Discuss)— Its like Dr.Gonzo says, the man never really ruled the Independent State of Croatia due to his misgivings with the Ustaše leadership (per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Monarchical titles). He was also never crowned and he thought the title itself was a joke. Finally, even if we choose to ignore the above, the NDH never really de jure existed, and one can hardly be a monarch of a non-existent state. —--DIREKTOR (TALK) 07:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sakura → Cherry blossom — (Discussions at Talk:Sakura#Requested move (old) and Talk:Sakura#Requested move: Cherry blossom (current)) — Move was requested at 09:20, 8 April 2008 by User:PeterSymonds as a {{db-move}}, but is disputed — Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Franjo Tuđman → Franjo Tudjman —(Discuss)— Orthography overwhelmingly used in reliable sources in English —Alai (talk) 07:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)