Content deleted Content added
Kevin Murray (talk | contribs) the proposal was rejected and it was made an essay as a compromise. Please look through the history of the talk page and the associated mediation |
Kevin Murray (talk | contribs) I am changing my tag for now. Maybe we could discuss how to proceed. |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:''For guidance on the encyclopedic suitability of subjects or articles as a whole, refer to [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. For the suitability of certain types of content, see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]]. For the relevance of links to outside websites, see [[Wikipedia:External links]].'' |
:''For guidance on the encyclopedic suitability of subjects or articles as a whole, refer to [[Wikipedia:Notability]]. For the suitability of certain types of content, see [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]]. For the relevance of links to outside websites, see [[Wikipedia:External links]].'' |
||
{{ |
{{essay}} |
||
{{Nutshell|[[WP:TOPIC|Stay on topic.]]}} |
{{Nutshell|[[WP:TOPIC|Stay on topic.]]}} |
||
Revision as of 02:54, 15 June 2008
- For guidance on the encyclopedic suitability of subjects or articles as a whole, refer to Wikipedia:Notability. For the suitability of certain types of content, see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. For the relevance of links to outside websites, see Wikipedia:External links.
On Wikipedia, relevance is simply whether a fact (in an article) is useful to the reader and is in the right article.
See also
Related guidelines
- Wikipedia:Writing better articles — a style guideline that "sets out advice on... how to make an article clear, precise and relevant to the reader." (italics added)
- Wikipedia:Relevance emerges
- Wikipedia:Relevance of content
- Wikipedia:What claims of relevance are false