Content deleted Content added
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This redirect is based on the fact that goodbrush.com is Craig Mullins' website (which has apparently been up and down - the redir is from '06 but there's no material on the site dating from before last week. However, I do not believe that anyone is going to search for this in reference to Mullins, and should therefore be deleted. I only found this (and two other redirects the user created to the same page) by looking at "what links here." [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] ([[User talk:MSJapan|talk]]) 19:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC) |
This redirect is based on the fact that goodbrush.com is Craig Mullins' website (which has apparently been up and down - the redir is from '06 but there's no material on the site dating from before last week. However, I do not believe that anyone is going to search for this in reference to Mullins, and should therefore be deleted. I only found this (and two other redirects the user created to the same page) by looking at "what links here." [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] ([[User talk:MSJapan|talk]]) 19:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
:'''Keep''' - I've made a stats comparison with another low-search article that I believe must stay -- which recieved 5 searches in April 08 -- and they both come up with similar search results -- since this one [http://stats.grok.se/en/200804/Goodbrush got 8] for that month. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 12:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
====[[Tomy Tutor]] → [[Texas Instruments TI-99/4A]]==== |
====[[Tomy Tutor]] → [[Texas Instruments TI-99/4A]]==== |
Revision as of 12:37, 9 June 2008
June 6
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 6, 2008
Goodbrush → Craig Mullins
This redirect is based on the fact that goodbrush.com is Craig Mullins' website (which has apparently been up and down - the redir is from '06 but there's no material on the site dating from before last week. However, I do not believe that anyone is going to search for this in reference to Mullins, and should therefore be deleted. I only found this (and two other redirects the user created to the same page) by looking at "what links here." MSJapan (talk) 19:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I've made a stats comparison with another low-search article that I believe must stay -- which recieved 5 searches in April 08 -- and they both come up with similar search results -- since this one got 8 for that month. JaakobouChalk Talk 12:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Tomy Tutor → Texas Instruments TI-99/4A
The redirect makes no sense. TT is not a TI-99/4A or even a clone of it. They are two very unique systems. Lyverbe (talk) 18:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Tomy Tutor - agree that there is no relation other than similar product theme. JaakobouChalk Talk 19:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep
- first hit on google for Tomy Tutor "The Tutor is not a clone of the Texas Instruments TI-99/4A computer from 1981, but they have much in common - perhaps a cooperative effort?" [1] followed by a list of similarities
- second hit "Part kid's toy, part graphics superstar, part unknown TI-99 clone" [2]
- third hit on google: "In US it falls, like its cousins TI 99/8 and TI 99/4" (translated from spanish) [3]
- magazine from 1983: "Along with the TI 99/4A the Grandstand (US version of Tommy Tutor) uses a 16 bit processor; a Texas 99/95 chip running at 3 MHz." [4]
- extensive comparison of Tomy with 99/2, 99/4, 99/4A and 99/8 "The similarities of the 99/8 with the Tutor, however, are much more than one would suspect. Indeed, based on the system architecture at large, the Tutor seems to be an evolved, independent system based on the 99/8's hardware, just without Texas Instruments" [5]
- The products are clearly related on all the retro hardware sites I saw. Either make it into an article about the product, or add a section on the target article talking about the computer. Optional, redirect to 99/8 article --Enric Naval (talk) 19:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- You won't get a encyclopedic definition of the "Tomy Tutor" by being redirected to TI-99. They might somewhat be similar internally, but that is it. I mean, my father and I are internally the same, but you cannot learn about me by reading HIS biography. I believe someone should make separate article or at least a section in TI-99 (like Atari 8-bit family), but not a mere redirect. -- Lyverbe (talk) 01:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as the Tomy Tutor is addressed in the target article. A standalone article on the TT is much more preferable, but until someone writes it, the redirect will do as a valid one. B.Wind (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:DOI → User:DOI bot/use