No edit summary |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
==== [[:File:STI airport diagram2008.png]] ==== |
==== [[:File:STI airport diagram2008.png]] ==== |
||
Uploader has had many of his uploads deleted due to them being clear copyright infringements despite claiming they are his own work. I strongly suspect that this image like others has been taken from a website with no evidence of permission. The uploaders comments "Woun {{sic}} work.. posted by IDAC/MDST (Cibao Airport)" seems to imply this. [[User:Camaron|Camaron<span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> Christopher]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> [[User talk:Camaron|talk]]</small> 16:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
Uploader has had many of his uploads deleted due to them being clear copyright infringements despite claiming they are his own work. I strongly suspect that this image like others has been taken from a website with no evidence of permission. The uploaders comments "Woun {{sic}} work.. posted by IDAC/MDST (Cibao Airport)" seems to imply this. [[User:Camaron|Camaron<span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> Christopher]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> [[User talk:Camaron|talk]]</small> 16:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
==== [[:File:Photo of a Sureño.jpg]] ==== |
|||
I strongly suspect this image is non-free based on previous uploads by same user above. It has same low quality, subject and same obviously fake Metadata. — <b><i><font color="#6600FF">[[User:Raeky|raeky]]</font></i></b> <sup>(<font color="#0033FF">[[User talk:Raeky|talk]]</font> | <font color="#00CC00">[[Special:Contributions/Raeky|edits]]</font>)</sup> 17:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:04, 27 September 2009
September 27
File:Ngbbs472f70a339649pl4.gif
Uploader is clearly not the creator. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 01:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Newshour.jpg
TV logo - no evidence uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:AlSmith.png
"Rights status not evaluated." per Library of Congress description page. [1] "Not all images displayed in this catalog are in the public domain." No reason why this should be public domain offered by uploader. Infrogmation (talk) 03:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
The picture is from 1923, it is old. Poor Al Smith can catch a break on Wikipedia.--Tilden76 (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Gerhard von Rad1.jpg
I doubt this image is public domain as claimed, because Gerhard von Rad died in 1971, and he looks quite old in this photo. —SpaceFlight89 04:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Artists impression.jpg
This is the work of Costco and not the uploader, The lower res file was at http://www.costco.com.au/Auburn/20090701a.jpg (A cache of a web forum which also used the image from Costco) Bidgee (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:ValerianFreyberg1999.jpg
scan of a painting (dated 1999) credited to U. K. Reunov, uploaded by User:Rodolph with Creative Commons license - no evidence of permission. Memphisto (talk) 10:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Photo of Lil Rob.jpg
Looks like a scanned/captured image from an album cover, tineye found this image: [2] No evidence of permission given. — raeky (talk | edits) 16:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:MS-13 Tattoo.jpg
A tineye search shows multiple versions of this image, no evidence of permission. — raeky (talk | edits) 16:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Photo of Proper Dos group.jpg
A previous revision of this image shows an http://elvolo.com tag, no evidence of permission. Original located here — raeky (talk | edits) 16:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:STI airport diagram2008.png
Uploader has had many of his uploads deleted due to them being clear copyright infringements despite claiming they are his own work. I strongly suspect that this image like others has been taken from a website with no evidence of permission. The uploaders comments "Woun [sic] work.. posted by IDAC/MDST (Cibao Airport)" seems to imply this. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Photo of a Sureño.jpg
I strongly suspect this image is non-free based on previous uploads by same user above. It has same low quality, subject and same obviously fake Metadata. — raeky (talk | edits) 17:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)