Talk:Enneagram of Personality/FAQ
Not necessary. The questions that were on here earlier were both 1) not frequently asked, and 2) answered incorrectly. We don't need this FAQ. jps (talk) 00:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete "G8. Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page.Such as talk pages with no corresponding subject page" why should the talk page continue when the underlying page has been deleted? That's why I called for the speedy delete--Wlmg (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The "answered incorrectly" is a content issue -- and removal of all content before proposing for deletion seems contrary to normal procedure. We should determine whether or not to keep a page on the basis of its content before the AfD nom blanks it. AfD is not a good place to settle content issues as a rule. Collect (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep for now, as the page doesn't appear to have been completed yet. Note that the nominator deleted the page's content before nominating it for deletion. I suggest the nominator read WP:ACTIVIST. Cla68 (talk) 01:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Following each other around much, Cla68 and Collect? jps (talk) 13:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Appropriate for an AfD comment, Joshua? The overlap between the two editors is de minimis. 8 articles and one essay, for example. And I do not see how such a massive overlap has anything at all to do with this article one whit. Closing admin please note. Collect (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- You two have been active in very similar areas as of recent, including an activist-amount of interest in WP:ACTIVIST on your part, an essay Cla68 penned. Neither of you comments that often at MfD in the past. Let me opine: you were pissed off by me and looked through my contributions finding this MfD. Cla68 simply followed suit. Closing admin please note, indeed. jps (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Eh? Try looking at my over 500 edits at MfD for a start. That is not very often? I am one of the most active editors there! I fear you are looking for reasons to dismiss genuine arguments to Keep at this point. Collect (talk) 14:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- A might touchy are we? This shows that, until I pointed out your particular interest in this MfD that your activity over the last few weeks was not that of a "Mfd-regular". Anyhow, it's good to see you comment at others. Keep your whistle whet! Cheers! 128.59.169.46 (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- You two have been active in very similar areas as of recent, including an activist-amount of interest in WP:ACTIVIST on your part, an essay Cla68 penned. Neither of you comments that often at MfD in the past. Let me opine: you were pissed off by me and looked through my contributions finding this MfD. Cla68 simply followed suit. Closing admin please note, indeed. jps (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Appropriate for an AfD comment, Joshua? The overlap between the two editors is de minimis. 8 articles and one essay, for example. And I do not see how such a massive overlap has anything at all to do with this article one whit. Closing admin please note. Collect (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Following each other around much, Cla68 and Collect? jps (talk) 13:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)