Hello I am the widow of the great Geochemist, Harold C. Helgeson and since this was the anniversary of his death I was looking at all of the wonderful articles on him and I noticed that Wikipedia has reduced his article down to mere sentence!! Wh does this??? This is very
upsetting to his family as he was the greatest Geochemst who ever lived and I would like to know how we can return the article to its original context.
Thanks.
Frances Helegson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.248.188.4 (talk) 02:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article was reduced to its current size after the removal of copyrighted text. Wikipedia cannot accept text that was copied and pasted from another site due to copyright law. Wikipedia articles must be written in your own words and must be summaries of what has been published in sources that have editorial oversight and a history of fact checking. I'm sorry but we are unable to restore the article to its previous state as the material has been permanently removed from the history. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Signature Problem.
I'm trying to use this (The Pancakeof Heaven!) as my signature, but it keeps saying "Invalid Raw Signature; Check HTML tags. how am I supposed to fix this? (If you could tell me the correct form that'll be great :) )
Code: '''[[User:The Pancake of Heaven!|<span style="background:#5d9731; color:white; padding:2px;">The Pancake</font>]] [[User talk:The Pancake of Heaven!|<span style="background:#1047AB; color:white; padding:2px;">of Heaven!</span>]]'''
HowTo? smarter searches within Wiki a'la Google with markup or Boolean logic?
My experience is that it is possible to do "dumb", "smart", and "smarter" searches with Google at the browser input field, with some "mark-up" with quotes and/or double-quotes and/or brackets to narrow the search. That would be something like regular expressions.
Is that possible within Wikipedia?
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help desk!
This page is only for questions about using Wikipedia, not for general knowledge questions. If you have any factual questions, please use the search box or post them on the Reference desk.
Before posting here, please read/search the FAQ and see if you can find the answer to your question there.
Please give the exact title or URL of any page you want help with.
If possible, please be specific in your question rather than general and link to any page or article your question involves, or at least tell us the title of the page.
In the above "Welcome to Wikipedia Help Desk!" that I can see during question creation, suppose I want to find only the two singular instances of "question", and exclude the three instances of plural "questions".
Or suppose in a very long Wiki article, I would like exact matches on the phrase "your question" rather than "your questions".
My impression is that this can be done with Google if you know what you are doing, and I haven't found a way to do the [admittedly contrived] search within Wiki.
Google provides excellent search facilities. Wikipedia provides rather poor search facilities. This is unlikely to change any time soon. So, if you want to do any non-trivial search within Wikipedia, just use Google, and be thankful that they provide this excellent service for free. Maproom (talk) 08:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@L d allan: Actually, Wikipedia does indeed have regex searching, as well as various other Wikipedia-specific searching tools: see Help:Searching or, for more detail, see mw:Help:CirrusSearch. Regex, non-stemming searches (match only "questions" rather than "question") and I believe boolean operators are all possible. — crh23 (Talk) 10:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extreme and persistent page vandalism
I have an issue and I don't know where to turn. I am really new to Wikipedia and am here to help a friend. At this point, my Wiki skills are somewhere between *zombie* and *newbie*.
There is a living person I know whose page was set up by an unrelated party. That party has used that page to post defamatory content about the living person. I came in and edited it a few times to correct the problem, but now the unrelated party has locked me out and this rogue page is creating a lot of trouble. The content clearly violates any precept of the NPOV as Wikipedia governance suggests.
My question - What recourse do we have? The living person in question here only became aware of his own Wiki page a couple of months ago. The content is derogatory, defaming, hurtful and just plain inaccurate.
It would be helpful if you'd provide a link to the page you mention. Jarkeld (talk) 13:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@ManjiroX: You don't have any edits in your account in the Wikipedia mainspace, so it's really hard to give good guidance on what you can do. Please tell us what page you are referring to. I could suggest WP:RFPP but I don't know if that's the right step at this point. Dismas|(talk) 16:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ManjiroX. Given that you seem to be talking about the page of a person you know. you have a Conflict of interest, and need to be very cautious about editing the page at all. However, the policy on Biographies of living persons says that you may (in fact, should) "Remove contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced". So, if the material your friend objects to is unsourced, then you may certainly remove it, and they should not be reinserting it: in that case, it is probably appropriate to report the issue on the BLPN - follow the instructions at the top. However, if the material they are adding is cited to reliable sources, then you should not remove it, even if the subject objects to it. As Dismas says, we can help you better if you tell us which article you are talking about. --ColinFine (talk) 21:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
username
if I create a username can I keep/merge my editing history/talk page into that? or will it all have to start over?68.48.241.158 (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You will have to start over. However, you can put a link on your new user page to your old contributions page. You can move your talk page over though. --Majora (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
alright I'll have to think about it then..68.48.241.158 (talk) 16:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just to point out, there are a few reasons why you should create an account. See WP:BENEFITS for those. It is completely up to you however. --Majora (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
do you mean my current talkpage can seamlessly become my new talkpage or can it just be linked to or copied and pasted over somehow?68.48.241.158 (talk) 17:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Talk pages can be moved (afaik), so yes, it can become your current talk page. — crh23 (Talk) 18:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to be able to keep my editing history as think this could be beneficial for a few reasons...what's the general philosophy behind not being able to move it over to a username? does it create technical problems? what's the difference between merging a talk page seamlessly vs merging an edit history seamlessly (if one can indeed seamlessly merge a talk page)??68.48.241.158 (talk) 18:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd assume it's a technical issue. If a registered user changes their username, the username will be changed in edit histories as well (ie. the user's edit histories are merged). But IP users without an account are a bit different. We always need IP contribution pages reserved to record edits made by you if you log out, or by others using your IP address while not logged in. That's why I don't imagine it's possible to merge IP users' contributions. You can always link back to your IP editing history: "my contributions when I did not have an account". – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
okay, thanks, makes sense..unless they could keep the IP history in place and that could be potentially added to by unlogged in...and copy paste the same history into my new username account...but they are probably just not set up to do this so...68.48.241.158 (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You should understand that IPs are often reassigned. This means your IP talk page can be given to someone else in the future. My advice would be to make an account, then copy/paste the talk page history and put a link to where you got it in your edit summary. HighInBC 18:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't the current page be moved using suppressredirect? — crh23 (Talk) 18:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
yes, if someone can weigh in on what the specific steps would be in terms of A. create an account (just do that normally?) B. make my current talk page my new talk page (if this can really be done)..C. and then I guess I could only link to my current edit history on my new (same) talk page? (I'm not sure about all this anyway, leaning toward the status quo)..68.48.241.158 (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Step 1: Create an account. Step 2: Put {{Userbox/IP Editor}} or something similar on your new user page. Step 3: Have someone who has the ability to move pages move your IP talk page to your new user talk page. Step 4: Blank the old IP user talk page. There is no need for suppressredirect as the page can stay created but blanked. Step 5: Enjoy your new account. --Majora (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was suggesting suppress redirect as the IP could potentially change owner in the future, and it is undesirable for a future user of that IP to appear to be the same person as the current user, — crh23 (Talk) 20:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
addition
in BSP u need to add Bromsulphthalein — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.81.137.216 (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All of a sudden my work computer started automatically logging me in even when I'm using the incognito browser and I don't want to tease people by citing the url if it's not free for everyone. Thank you! —PermStrump(talk) 20:13, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The full article is visible to me. Note that WP:PAYWALL allows online source that require payment. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimeHunter: Thanks! I was planning to cite the source either way. I just wasn't going to add the url if it was behind a paywall, because IMHO it feels like a tease. :-P I used to be able to open up the incognito browser to do a quick check, but it stopped working and I didn't know how else to tell without using a different computer. —PermStrump(talk) 20:31, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Permstrump: If a URL is not freely accessible, registration=yes or subscription=yes can be added to indicate this in the citation template - Template:cite journal has some more details. GermanJoe (talk)
You should propose this on the article's talk page – as you have already done (without the unnecessary "(1950)"). Maproom (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The response is appreciated. Irondome (talk) 23:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please delete my entry
How can I get my entry deleted? It his hugely libelous and makes me look crazy, and it is wildly inaccurate, based on bloggers' notes. How can I just get the whole thing deleted? I'm not anyone important and it is preventing me from even getting a job at a gas station. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1313:C2A7:7414:169E:7D29:A591 (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Without more information we cannot help you further. Please provide the name of the article in question so our volunteer helpers can take a look at it and suggest appropriate action. Thank you. --Majora (talk) 22:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Which article are you referring to? You need to specify that.
If you want to nominate it for deletion, then please see WP:AFD- you need to gain a consensus to delete pages, although if you really aren't notable, then it'll probably get deleted.
Finally, I highlighted this on your IP talkpage, but there is an implied legal threat with your comments, which is not permitted. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
read the page..there's nothing wrong with suggesting something is potentially libelous or discussing whether something is or not..your warning is misinformed and erroneous..68.48.241.158 (talk) 23:51, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced the NLT warning with a welcome and a question seeking details about their concern. A polite mention of libellous material is not a threat unless it is used for intimidation. This person is trying to make us aware of a problem and they are doing it in a productive way. HighInBC 15:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you are the article subject and have concerns, you should contact the Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team here. They have the proper facilities to verify your identity and assist you. Eagleash (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do we need to highlight reasons to you as to why this overwhelmingly autobiographical page should be subjected to "Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion" ?
A search on the internet clearly raises alarms regarding the complete lack of Notability of Katrina Mathers.
We have regularly seen Wikipedia pages set up to promote one's own business - these pages have always been removed very quickly.
We are concerned when autobiographical pages such as Katrina Mathers are created: Wikipedia's integrity suffers a great deal as I am sure you are aware.
Thanks and please place these concerns on the Talk page of Katrina Mathers page - I am unable to do so
Srbernadette (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deleted under criterion G11, unambiguous advertising or promotion. It was all promoting Mathers. Nyttend (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Help with Original Research
I'm trying to get my head around how to identify 'original research' in the non-obvious cases. In strolling through articles with OR tags, I ran across [Little Heath, Coventry]. Could someone please look at this page and tell me what the original research here is (if any)? Thanks Leschnei (talk) 23:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The third paragraph of Little Heath, Coventry appears to be possible WP:OR, including the assertion that the church hall is used for Brownie meetings. It needs sourcing to WP:RS Cheers, Irondome (talk) 00:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything that's likely to be original research. Most of it describes the current village, and it's stuff that could be found in the local telephone directory or Ordnance Survey map. The only real exceptions to that are the groups using the church hall (that can probably be found in some Guiding publication) and the construction period for the terraced houses, and I'm sure that such a general statement as this would be sourceable from something that's been reliably published. The real problem is the thorough lack of citations. Nyttend (talk) 00:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Nyttend on the above. It badly needs sources. Irondome (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I noticed the lack of sources. I just wasn't sure that mentioning Brownie meetings warranted an OR tag. I suppose details like that could be added by someone living in the town without reference to any source at all which, of course, would not be good.
On that note, we addressed the issues of OR and sourcing, but we didn't address the issue of unencyclopedic content. Lots of the detail in the article is patently unencyclopedic, and sources or no sources, it needs to be trimmed. Nyttend (talk) 04:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In the "Children" section of this page, I cannot understand why there is a link that is in red. Please fix if you are able to work it out - I have to retire now so cannot keep at it. Thanks Srbernadette (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry - I have altered the format and left a gap too large. What do you think? Please adjust accordingly. Sorry and thanks and I am off to bed now. Srbernadette (talk) 00:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am considering rewriting the history section of Portland Public Schools (Oregon), which is currently full of errors. I am projecting that a rewritten version would be two to three times longer than the current section. Would it be better to rewrite that section, or create a new article History of Portland Public Schools (Oregon)? Margalob (talk) 03:38, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Margalob: Rewrite the section. That way everything is kept together and the history stays in tact. If you are concerned about letting people know you can always put the {{under construction}} template on the page or in the specific section. --Majora (talk) 03:45, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article states accurately that the 9th INF Division was under control in the 3rd Corps area, but the focus is only on the 2nd brigade operating in the Delta with the Mobile Riverine forces in the 4th Corps area! Headquarters was in 3 Corps located at BearCat in Bien Hoa province/ Long Thanh District. There is no reference to this information or the majority of operations the 9th conducted within 3rd Corps. I was an ARVN infantry advisor with MAC-V in Long Thanh District from June 1968 - May 1969. For the first part of my tour, we had a platoon of the 9th infantry stationed with us in our compound and during a major attack on our District Headquarters, the 9th Infantry sent relief units to our aid from Bearcat in October 1968. Later in my tour, the 9th relocated to Dong Tam in the Delta/4th Corps. They were replaced in Bearcat by the Thai Army. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.233.207.200 (talk) 19:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thanks for your suggestion. Wikipedia's policy is that only information which has been reliably published somewhere may be put into articles, (because otherwise a reader has no way of verifying whether it is correct). If you have a published source for the information you want to add, please feel free to edit the article, or to suggest the edit on the article's talk page; but I'm afraid that if the information is only from your personal knowledge (or from unpublished records) then Wikipedia cannot accept it. Please see Verifiability for more information. --ColinFine (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How to request a photo
A number of years ago, I saw a page here that was sort of a helpful how-to about requesting images from notable people. There was even a boiler plate email that you could send to the subject of an article requesting a photo. I'm trying to locate now and can't. Does this sound familiar to anyone? Dismas|(talk) 20:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
While that's not what I remember, it helps a lot. Thank you!
To be more specific, I also remember a bulleted list including such things as "Invite your recipient to view your userpage to show that you are making a legitimate request and edit your user page to make it look nice and professional". Dismas|(talk) 20:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Adding to Discography
I would like to add the American Top 40 to singer's discography. I find this much more relevant than Billboard. Can someone show me how to add this on the graph that shows any singers discography and if this is possible to do. Thank you. 21:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdharri73 (talk • contribs)
Adding to Discography
Sorry if this is a duplicate. I am new here. I am wanting to add to the graph on an artist's discography to include the American Top 40 along with the other charts on artists pages. Can this be done, and if so, how? Thank you Sdharri73 (talk) 21:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdharri73: Maybe I'm the only one but I find your question a little confusing. Do you want to edit an article for a single artist? Or the article for many artists? Or create a template which will appear on many artist's articles? Dismas|(talk) 22:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if it is confusing, I have never used this template or help desk before. I am wanting to start a new section for AT40 music on many artists discography pages. For instance, on this page.....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Posner_discography....On the "Singles as Lead Artist" section, I want to add another US section, this one being Top 40 next to the Billboard one, so it would say US Top 40 and have number two for "A Pill In Ibezia", next to the one that says 4 for US (which is the Billboard peak number). This is under the Peak Chart Positions on that page. Does that make sense? Thanks for your help. Sdharri73 (talk) 22:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The ORIX brand should be capitalized but is often written " Orix" incorrectly, I've updated ORIX in the content, but can't find how to update the actual "Orix" page name.
Is there a simple way to rotate images at Hatebreed on Wikipedia. Please {{ping}} me when you respond. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Jax 0677 If you click on the image, there's an option to request rotation. I've requested a rotation of the images, and a bot should do it. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please help. Citation number 13. I have used the wrong template - the incorrect date beside the author's name is all wrong . The article was RETREIVED today - not WRITTEN by Christopher Wilson today. Please keep in quote. Please fix if you are able Thanks Srbernadette (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks in advance. I am a tired editor and ref number 7 on the above page has not worked out . Please fix sorry Srbernadette (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed in [2]. An access date in the future gives an error message. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ref number 1 is wrong - and I don not know why. please help again and I will stay off editing for a while. Sorry Srbernadette (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed in [3]. Year 20166 gave an error message. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
changing languages
Hello,
I usually use wikipedia to the translation of a specific term. I used to click on "read this article in another language". I no longer find this option. Can you help me?
Titiaflamme (talk) 01:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC) titiaflamme[reply]
If you look on the left side of this page there is long list of other language versions. This should appear on a lot, but not all, articles as well. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Titiaflamme. I wonder if you are talking about the Wikipedia app? I've a feeling that used to say "Read this article in another language". If so, I find on the Android app it's in the top right (three dots) menu, called "Change language". --ColinFine (talk) 15:12, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How to create a wiki page
Hello everyone:
can anyone give me step by set instructions on how to create a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deannabombchica (talk • contribs) 02:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It seems a bot-created archive got lost due to some wrong coding on Talk:Brainwashed (George Harrison album). As you can see here, the talkpage consisted of three entries (one of them actually a factual question regarding the article from 2006 that never got answered) when the bot came rolling around with this edit in 2013. The result is that the talkpage is empty now (except for the Beatle box at the top and a new bot entry from 2016), and the archive link is red, pointing at nothing. --79.242.222.168 (talk) 04:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Yeepsi (talk·contribs) is actually a bot, it looks like this was an attempt at manually archiving these entries. Give me a few minutes to patch this up. Rwessel (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Feel free to review what I've done. FWIW, it was probably not worth archiving those three entries, but... Rwessel (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Could a bot be written that checks for red archive links and reports them to you clever coding peeps? --79.242.222.168 (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure how a bot would detect all redlinks to archive pages, although a stab at some common patterns doesn't seem impossible. I think there's a way to list all redlinks (see, for example, Special:WantedPages), and you might just be able to search such a list for anything with "/archive" in the name. You might consider proposing this at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Rwessel (talk) 06:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In the "academic section" of this article, the "citation needed" is incorrect. The reference to Bryce's short career in the legal world is indeed in reference number 4.
May I suggest that you please remove the "citation needed" clause. Thanks Srbernadette (talk) 04:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source #4 does mention that, and I've replaced the ((cn)) with a named reference to that source. But I have my doubts as to the reliability of that source. Rwessel (talk) 05:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ref number 1 is wrong. I failed with my "cut and paste". I need to sleep. Sorry - please fix. Srbernadette (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done already – duplicate of earlier request. Maproom (talk) 06:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
View another user's sandbox?
Is there a way to view another user's sandbox? Does this require a user to share his or her sandbox somehow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AugusteBlanqui (talk • contribs) 08:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there is a way. And no special actions are needed. You just need to know (or guess, or investigate) what the name of the sandbox is. For example if you go to the search box and type User:CiaPan/ the box will expand a drop-list suggesting three existing pages:
User:CiaPan/sandbox
User:CiaPan/Sandbox
User:CiaPan/example of autoextending table cell
You can accept any of them and see my sandbox pages. --CiaPan (talk) 08:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You can also click on the user contributions link and scroll to the bottom of the page. There you will see a link to "subpages" which will show you all the pages in a users space. Try it on the last link (Sunasuttu) in my signature. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Almost nothing on Wikipedia (actually the whole of the WMF servers) is hidden or private - the major exception is the actively running server software code, that must obviously be protected so that the various WMF websites can actually run. Certain types of content is hidden or deleted, usually for legal reasons. This page has the basics of when why and how certain content is removed. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Articles about what?
A long time ago there was a listing of topics wiki articles were wanted about, but I cannot find it. Thanks! 76.67.82.88 (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How do you save your latest version of draft article? I keep saving it but when I do preview, it says I haven't saved the latest version and when I login, the contributions and history, show an earlier version? I want to submit the latest for review. Pls. help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedybaker (talk • contribs) 16:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hedybaker, when you are editing the article, you should see three buttons under the edit box, Save Page, Show Preview, and Show Changes. Show Preview will show you a preview of what the article will look like once you hit Save Page. It sounds like you're previewing but never saving. Dismas|(talk) 17:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Or perhaps saving without a edit summary. Mb66w (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
converting links
I,m an active wikipedian on urdu and english wiki i mostly translate pages from eng to urdu wiki so i have to to copy articles and then paste on urdu wiki ,when i paste eng link ,so it will convert into red link,Now my question is that is there any shortcut that i can convert these link into existing relative urdu articles with out wasting time in searching then again copy paste.--Baltistani (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2016 (UTC)-[reply]
Hello, Baltistani. You will sometimes be able to avoid having to search, by going to the referenced English article, and seeing if it already has an Interwiki link to an Urdu article; but I don't think there's any shortcut to finding that and replacing the text. And where the article isn't already linked to an Urdu article, I don't think there's anything you can do but search. --ColinFine (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
3rd battalion 4th marines
I am trying to contact someone regarding the page written about 3rd battalion 4th marines. There is a marine from 3/4 that is a Silver Star, Purple Heart and multiple NAM with V recipient. How can we get him added to the notable marines from 3/4? Thanks very much. That Marine is Wyatt Waldron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.229.5 (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, IP user. Wikipedia doesn't work like most resources you're probably familiar with: anybody can edit an article. But "notable" has a special meaning in Wikipedia: it doesn't mean famous, or important, or influential, or heroic, or popular or anything like that. It means simply "there has been enough material published about this person to write a well-sourced article about them"; because Wikipedia articles are required to be based entirely on published material, so that a reader can in principle always check the information in an article. If you can find such sources, then there could be an article on this person, and you may add them to the article in question - or you could suggest it on the talk page of the article. Alternatively, you could ask for assistance at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. But if there are not suitable published sources for that person, then I'm afraid Wikipedia will not take note of them and they can't be added to the article. --ColinFine (talk) 18:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
omission of Sunderland UK on your latitudes of cities site
Shame on Wikipedia. The largest city on the east coast of England that is: Sunderland was not even mentioned on your Latitudes of Cities. Shame on you Wikipedia. Karma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunderlandian (talk • contribs) 19:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
England is strongly overrepresented there with 30 cities. Including a small city like Sunderland seems like systemic bias. Many 5-10 times as large cities in other countries are omitted. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Beant Singh was not an assassin he was a FREEDOM FIGHTER. He killed Indira because she attacked their Golden Temple without any reason so consequently she was executed. It does not make any sense to describe a Freedom Fighter as an assassin it is RIDICULOUS!!.
The scope of the website is to give any type of information to there reader, but not the fake one.
So kindly I am asking to change the wrong title in the correct one
Hi Caspio19 - it appears this person took part in an assassination, and (from a quick search) we don't have any articles on people with "(Freedom fighter)" appended, possibly due to the connotations the phrase holds? I can understand your frustration, and agree somewhat that an involvement in an assassination only tentativly makes someone an "assassin" - perhaps something like "activist"? This would be a discussion ideally suited on the article's talk page -- samtartalk or stalk 20:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Wikipedia refers to subjects using the words that are most often applied to them. I have examined all the citations in the article Beant_Singh_(assassin). Of those which I have been able to check, I find six use the word "assassin" or "assassination", two use "killer" or "killing", one uses "martyrdom", and none use "freedom fighter". So the current title is appropriate. Maproom (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The first name should be Lyman NOT Lymans - a typing error when the article was created added the extra "s". Could someone go in there and correct it, please? Thanks, Rosalina523 (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have submitted my first article for review (after two rejects). Since the submission date I have made minor changes and added a photo. My question is every time I make a change does my article go back to the end of the queue?
Do we have a place to ask style questions, or is WT:MOS it? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 02:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Style questions can go here. Dismas|(talk) 02:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well then: I had posted a question at WT:MOS#Are editions of major works also major works? about whether the names of special editions should be italicized. Please have a look if you are knowledgeable about grammatical matters and style guides. Thanks! I posted here because I was worried I’d put the question in the wrong place. Should they go here instead? Does it matter? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You can place style questions here as the place where you posted the question is not the place to discuss particular article's style queries. I am replicating your question below for other contributors to comment. Xender Lourdes (talk) 05:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It’s actually a project-wide query. Like I said in the question, I can’t find an answer in the MOS, and it’s inconsistent throughout WP. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 12:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The original question by the editor:
If a video game has a “Game of the Year Edition,” or an album has a “Collector’s Edition,” or a movie has a “Director’s Cut” release, should the edition name be italicized as well (per MOS:T#Major works)? Is “Game of the Year Edition” considered a partial title, part of the name of the major work, for instance Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception: Game of the Year Edition? (If so, should we also say “they released a Game of the Year Edition”?) A brief internal search shows italics inconsistently applied to such labels, so some guidance would be helpful. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My answer to this would be, that it depends on the actual name of the game. If the company has released it with the full name of the edition being "Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception: Game of the Year Edition", then italicise the full name including the Game of the Year Edition part. At the same time, do note that many a time, consensus on the article's talk page can reach a different conclusion, in which case you should follow the reached consensus. Xender Lourdes (talk) 05:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think that quite works. From a quick internal search, I find:
Call of Duty 2 does not italicize “Special Edition” or “Game of the Year Edition,” and doesn’t even capitalize “a collector’s edition” or “the mobile version” (the latter of which is indisputably a different game).
The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind italicizes “Game of the Year Edition” alone and both with and without a preceding colon, but not “Special Edition Soundtrack.”
Batman: Arkham Asylum has “Game of the Year edition” roman with a small E, but italicizes “a Collector’s Edition.”
When, if ever, should an edition name be considered part of the name proper, and when should it not? It sounds like your answer is always. The Lord of the Rings Extended Edition? Alan Wake Demo? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 12:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve posted again at WT:MOS to ask about adding guidance on this to MOS:T. Personally, I’d advise treating any “edition” label as not a part of the work title proper unless there isn’t any doubt that it is: the Payday 2 demo, Doom collector’s edition, but Dead Island Definitive Edition or Resident Evil HD Remaster. Same goes for EP and LP music releases, movies, books, etc. It sounds like Xender would have us take whatever they put on the box and use it as the full title. I’m fine with however the consensus goes, as long as we have some kind of decision. Wondering if I should start an RFC. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You can post at WT:MOS (as you have) for a guidance to be included in the current manual. My initial suggestion is actually the same as your statement above. I too would prefer that the additional "2nd edition" etc should be italicised only if the so titled "2nd edition" etc is clearly included as the name of the particular release. It's a tough call but, and should be finally taken on the talk pages of respective articles. The thing to keep in mind is that whichever way the article decides – like in the case of citing sources where you can use any style of citing you wish in an article – you should maintain consistency within the particular article. It's not necessary that in such cases – where individual cases of naming of video games may differ – that we have the same format followed across Wikipedia. Xender Lourdes (talk) 02:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"I Hate Everything" page deleted. Please restore the page.
The page for YouTuber "I Hate Everything" has been deleted for some reason. Previous users have cited lack of press coverage of any kind as a reason why it was deleted. However, the Nostalgia Critic of Channel Awesome cited the channel when'I Hate Everything" noted flaws in YouTube's copyright system. The Wikipedia page cited a controversy the channel was victim of. It feels like someone deleted the page to withhold useful information to the public regarding freedom of speech. Please do something about this problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Internet Informant (talk • contribs) 03:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Internet Informant: Okay, so Nostalgia Critic is one media outlet (if he qualifies as such) that may support notability. Who else? Any mainstream media? I love what I’ve seen of IHE’s work, but frankly, I’ve never heard of him outside of YouTube. If you have, that would help. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 03:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Internet Informant: you can see why it was deleted here. Please note that an occasional cite by a third party here or there is not significant coverage. Furthermore, I'm not convinced that Nostalgia Critic of Channel Awesome is a reliable source - he does not represent a news organization or publishing house that would be known for accurate information and high journalistic standards. Lastly, Wikipedia is not a place for all kinds of information – no matter how useful or on how important topics (like the freedom of speech). Rather, it's a place for a specific kind of information: encyclopedic information about notable subjects. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Citations
Hello!
I'm having trouble getting my citations to save in SandBox (I haven't submitted for review yet). I've used programs similar to this so I'm pretty sure I'm doing it correctly. Any tips?
Thelindy500, please read WP:Citing sources for details. Generally, in the simplest form, you should write <ref>[Source details]</ref> after the statement you are wishing to give a citation for. The source details can take various forms. Do read up and write back for more assistance. Btw I have structured up your draft a bit. Xender Lourdes (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please see my Dame Mary Stafford edit - in the Second marriage section of the above page. My comp. is stalling mid-edit and I cannot complete the new citation. Please note that I have put in the book and page number of the ref. I hope that you can do it for me. Please!144.139.149.95 (talk) 05:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Thanks so much[reply]
Your citation reads "Karen Lindsey, p. 73". I cannot guess what book you intend to cite. Maproom (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am still unable to do the edit myself sorry. The 2011 book is by Alison Weir; titled - "Mary Boleyn, the great and infamous whore". The reference is in the first sentence of the fourth paragraph in the "second marriage" section on the Mary Boleyn page. I have also given the page number.l - Page 246. Please put in this citation if you can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.189.0.102 (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please help. See two queeries earlier and you will see that I have clarified author, book and page number - it is all online. Please put citation in. I cannot cut and paste on mobile. Sorry and thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.189.0.102 (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for my persistence. I am on a laptop now - the best I could do to add a new verifiable ref - number 24 - is now on the Mary Boleynpage.
Please let me know if ref number 24 is OK. It is not how I usually do citations, but, as I have explained, my laptop is not permitting me to use the usual template. Thanks101.189.0.102 (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All pages suddenly missing equation images. SVG in background does not work in all browsers - does not work in last secure version of Firefox ("secure" is such version, that has got Firefox.js in plain file available for security editing... newer versions of Firefox cannot be secured, because Firefox.js with meddle-snoop configuration is packed inside Omni.ja file. Chrome and IE are totally unsecure, because cannot switch off javascript). The math is missing in older version of IE also...
<math> is not rendered, <meta> with "background: url()" is not rendered either. The pages without equations are crippled.
Not sure, how long is that, in mid-april it worked - there was <img> with TeX in "alt" attribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.98.159.114 (talk) 08:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Download the latest chrome version and use it to view your equation images. If you only wish to view them, there is no need to log into your account any way. And if you wish to work on them, do please work freely; this is just Wikipedia, not a financial payment gateway. Do write back if you need some help. Xender Lourdes (talk) 11:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No sorry, Chrome is not secure and I may not use it. "Latest" does not mean "Best", almost never... There is (or was) a golden internet rule, that USER chooses his software, not the content provider! The pages, saved to MHT (mime html) format could be displayed in very old email clients too, they could be packed to CHM archives, which are opened in IE, that may be quite old... It all worked fine until this April-May, when suddenly stopped appearing PNG equations, using <math> instead... Forcing unsecure browser (among many else falsely blocking "undesired" pages, also with privacy issues etc...) and of a single software provider to internet users this way by Wikipedia would be really ugly... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.98.159.114 (talk) 12:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Renaming a redirect
Unsure of where to post this. Apologies if it's in the wrong spot. The redirect Thimble Theater properly points to the article Popeye, as it was is the strip where Popeye originated. However, the proper spelling of the strip is and always has been Thimble Theatre, RE not ER. I considered just making a brand new redirect and deleting the old one, however there are pages that link to the misspelled redirect. Thanks. JeffConn (talk) 10:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just create the new redirect. There is no need to delete the old one as it is a plausible misspelling. -- GBfan 10:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And based on the fact that it is a mispelling, I changed the spelling of all of the mainspace articles pointing to Thimble Theater
If the real problem is that the primary title is now Thimble Theater and it should be Thimble Theatre, you can request a renaming at Requested Moves, but that is hardly important since both spellings will work. Is there an unwritten rule against requesting such trivial renamings? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Being flagged for advertising
I've been editing a few pages by adding content about new technology in the field. The problem is it keeps getting removed for advertising. At first I made the mistake of using a company site for a source but since I used publications it still gets removed. How can I explain the new technology and not come off as selling it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morrow363 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Morrow363: The tone of this addition does sound a little like you're trying to sell something - mixed with the inclusion of a link to http://www.aquisense.com/ (a supplier of UV Germicidal products) as a reference would lead many editors to belive you were attempting to promote the company. Please don't start an edit war by repeatedly reverting other editors - as Ronz stated "if there's something here that doesn't violate NOT, it needs to be rewritten from independent sources" -- samtartalk or stalk 13:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I notice a lot of people getting blocked for COI/promotion...it seems a lot of the articles they try to create are indeed about non-notable subjects (small companies they own/are closely involved in) so the articles wouldn't pass for notability...I'm wondering about subjects (companies/whatever) that are indeed notable but it would be highly unlikely anyone who doesn't have a COI would create an article about them...consider a medium-sized law firm with maybe 100 partners...a firm like this that's been around for any period of time would almost certainly pass for notability but it's probably unlikely anyone without a COI would have any interest in creating an article about it...this is just a random example..there are probably better examples...so are there at least theoretically many notable subjects that will never have articles because of this? Or in practice would the technical COI likely fly under the radar?....general input please...68.48.241.158 (talk) 14:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure what the question is. Conflict of interest blocks, which are normally paid editing blocks (a more specific and more serious kind of COI block) are not based on the notability of the subjects of the articles that they submit. Editors do not get blocked for submitting articles on nonnotable subjects (except for very rare situations, such as repeatedly submitting the same article after it was deleted). Editors do get blocked for failure to declare that they are paid editors. That is done regardless of whether the subject is notable or not notable. As to your comment that many theoretically notable subjects will never have articles because of lack of interest, I disagree. Out of hundreds of millions of Anglophone writers, any of whom can create an account (why don't you?), there is likely to be one person who is interested in a notable topic. I don't know if that was your question. However, conflict of interest blocks are not based on the notability or lack thereof of subjects. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
there are a lot of blocks for promotion/coi..the promotion seems to be the primary reason for the block but the coi is usually referenced too in the block etc (the two ideas seem to be highly intertwined in the blocks)...what about my example above about the law firm...would it be disallowable for a partner in that firm to write a Wikipedia article about the firm (that passed for notability and for non-pov article content etc)? or would the article have to simply not exist because he wrote it? (I'm assuming in practice for a article topic like that the coi would fly under the radar anyway)..68.48.241.158 (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(also, see above thread "username" since you have demonstrated interest in the topic)..68.48.241.158 (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you link to an account that has been blocked where COI was referenced so we can look at what you are talking about? It is not against the rules for someone with a COI to create an article. It is highly discouraged but not prohibited. It is against the rules to get paid to create articles without declaring that you are a paid editor. As long as paid editors follow the rules they can create articles about something where they are paid to do it. So in your example, if a partner or more likely an intern created the article on behalf of the firm and they are getting paid to do it, they should declare their COI and that they are paid to create the article. They should not get blocked if they follow the rules. -- GBfan 15:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That block does not mention COI at all. It mentions that the account was used for advertising or promotion and that the username does not follow the username policy. Usernames can not be the name of the company. They can include the name of the company. A bad username would be ACME Fireworks, a good username would be Bill @ ACME Fireworks. The first one indicates that it is the company that is editing and may be shared by the employees there. The second one says it is Bill that works at the company. As a side note when you linked to the user talk page above you included the whole address, You could have easily linked just using the page name, User talk:A SKETCH MAN with [[ before and ]] after. -- GBfan 15:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
true, but the COI issue seems to implied to some extent and you'll notice he's being questioned about it below his unblock request....but, again, it appears proper COI editing is allowable, which basically answers my question...68.48.241.158 (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just noticed this interesting case that is a good example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kylejax.twenty20 Based on the links he provided I think the company at least has a reasonable chance of passing notability...his draft may have been poor but I can't seem to be able to see it...how should this play out? Should have he been blocked or simply worked with in a less aggressive fashion?68.48.241.158 (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Image array
I am working on the aromatization article and would like to include a block of four images as follows:
Each column will be the same height, and a single caption below to describe all four images. I have been experimenting a bit with the multiple image template, but am still learning. Is there a template to do what I am describing? Thanks. EdChem (talk) 15:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Something like this?
Table caption
Some additional info may go here, if you think it would be helpful for readers. And even more end more.
But watch out – if it's too long, it may cause the table to expand.
This error means that you have added a reference name without actually assigning that name to a reference. At the first instance of the reference, you should input <ref name=XXX>details of the ref</ref>. Then when you need to use the same reference you only need to input <ref name=XXX/>. Eagleash (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In this case there seems to be only one instance of the ref being used (after 'languages' at the top of the page). Write the full ref as a normal ref between the ref tags (<ref></ref>) and the error should disappear. Eagleash (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Acer Cyle: Additional basic referencing information for new editors is also available at WP:Referencing for beginners, if you want to read up a bit more on the topic. (I took the liberty and have removed the additional redundant header in your initial message). GermanJoe (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ghost (Fake) Artists Lists
I am sorry if this question was already discussed. I am new in WP editing/monitoring and so far didn't find it.
Recently I came across the issue of 'ghost' artist - name of allegedly dead, but actually never existed people. In different areas it may be done for different purposes. EG in art - for creating a record with sales on different auctions (like eBay) to find later in your backyard hundreds of works on this non-existent artist.
I came across several names. One of them is Nicholas Kalmakoff.
Here I explain why this artist is an obvious scam
As I understand, Nicholas Kalmakoff page was deleted/removed several times from English Wikipedia, but Swedish page still exist.
Would it be reasonable to create Nicholas Kalmakoff page with indication that the name is a fake used in various scams? What about lists of other ghosts? Any discussions about suspicious/never existed people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladKSF (talk • contribs) 15:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The question is: can you find multiple independent reliable (WP:RS) references to establish notability of the non-existence? RJFJR (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't get any answer first time, and it was not in forum, I just alerted moderators. But they wrote that it is to much to read in info I provided, so I just concentrated on one particular person. If you really respect Wikipedia, you should read before writing an answer. I provided a link to my article where I have briefly explained everything. if it takes too much to follow the link, I post it here, below. Than you would probably not teach me how to Anglicise Russian names, because my father participated in decision-making process of changing -off ending to -ov. -off was common in the age when second language in Russia was French. HOWEVER names of Russian emigrants who left earlier and adopted -off -eff for their new documents are spelled in the old way eg. Leontief, Tarasoff, Smirnoff... Nobody, (except probably you) will write Tarasov case, because the name is Tarasoff.
Regarding your links I can show you why they are fake. You can, actually see it yourself if you will make some research. The fact that Russian mafia invested a lot of money in is one of the reasons why I write about it. Their goal is to reach million dollar sales for their "artists", so they hire top level professionals to incorporate their info everywhere. They even go that far to change text of the poem (though not the most known) of Russian poet Игорь Северянин.
And here is the text of my article.
Extended content
Kalmakoff scam: art forgeries, ghost artists and manipulation of the past.
First time I came across the name Nicholas Kalmaloff, ascribed to never existed artist, after buying fake Antique postcards on eBay. I started googling names on the cards and found a card made after image belonging to Jewish Museum of Catastrophe, Yad-Vashem. The image was very slightly modified and ascribed to some non-existing German photo artist. Many links of artist’s names directed on metropostcard.com where I found an amazing masterpiece of human ignorance — biography of another “ghost” artist — Nicholas Kalmakoff.
Spelling of the name Kalmakoff made me feel something similar that native speaker of English would feel looking on the name Jhon Smiht. “Kal” is sh*t in Russian, “mak” could be the root of verb “makat” — to put in. So the name Kalmakoff sounds very special. Common Russian family name is KOlmalov, not Kalmakoff. While the endings of Russian last names changed their spelling form -off to -ov (common way of spelling now), never ever in history O could have written as A.
Research with google and other Internet search engines confirmed my feeling that there are no people named Kalmakoff in Russia. However, this last name happened to be common among Aleuts of Alaska where first European colonizers were Russians. Apparently, initially Nicholas Kalmakoff (or at least his name) was created by the native speaker of English who mistakenly took Aleutian name for Russian.
Reading the biography of an “artist” on metropostcard.com was truly unique experience. It was amazing to see how creators of Kalmakoff’s image who made by shill bidding million dollar auction sales for Kalmakoff’s art were not just ignorant of very basic historic realities. They were I would say aggressively illiterate, showing tones of contempt to any knowledge about the world outside regulations of online auctions. In the first sentence of biography it was said that Italian Russian artist Kalmakoff was son of Russian general and Italian woman who was born and grew up in the town of Nervi in Italy. The existence of Nervi was probably only piece of correct factual information in this sentence. However, in 1873 Nervi was a remote fishermen village, not an upscale resort on Italian Riviera, favourite destination of post-Soviet nouveau-riches where they regularly organize days of Russian culture. What kind of Italian woman supposedly was Kalmakoff’s mother? Remember that 19th century was still the age of slavery. If she was a peasant, she would have been considered sub-human by Russian aristocrat, so baby Kalmakoff had no chance of having such parents officially. If she were of noble birth, Italian aristocrat — 19th century Russian nobles didn’t know the word divorce. It was virtually non-existing. In that case, what was the family of Russian aristocrat doing in fishermen village in Italy.
I will stop examining Kalmakoff’s bio not to be boring, but in reality it goes on and on having at least one anachronism in each and every sentence. Reading it is like getting information about first gold seekers in 19th century Alaska entertaining themselves by watching TV in their RVs. Believe me, as a former teacher of history I would commit suicide if one of my students wrote such an essay. Just one more thing from bio, which I wanted to mention is that after coming to St.Petersburg, Russia at the age of 30 to study at the Imperial School of Law (there was no such thing in St. Petersburg in 1900) Kalmakoff joint the Skoptsy sect. Well, in 19th century people usually didn’t start their career and go to school at the age of 30, but never mind. Skoptsy was tiny, boorish, crazy sect initiation to which was ritual castration. what did Russian aristocrat had to do with it? Logically, it is absolutely clear why counterfeiters put skopsty in Kalmakov’s bio. This was the way of justification ascribing to Kalmakoff erotic and sexual imagery. As they said it themselves, ritual celibacy of skopsty subconsciously turned Kalmakoff to erotism. Apparently, in their ignorance authors of the bio didn’t find better justification for Kalmakoff’s erotism.
It all could have been just funny if not for reaction of Russian internet on the appearance of Kalmakoff. Almost nobody dared to question introduction of the new artist, and if somebody did, it caused a response in the best traditions of Goebbels’ propaganda: if somebody doubts “the truth”, repeat it thousand times for them. Times when somebody was not 100% sure in existence of the new classic of the Russian art coincided with the appearance of new articles about Kalmakoff and dozens of the newfound masterpieces (by the way, all created in different styles). Suddenly the world became very flexible — poems of Russian classics were changed to incorporate the mentioning of Kalmakoff, books about classic appeared in the library of Stanford university and on Amazon. Partially the silence of Russian experts was explainable — every word against the ruling party could resulted in hundred new evidences of Kalmakoff, disappearance of books from archives, so it totally makes sense to remain silent otherwise the number of newfound works of Kalmakoff would exceed that of all other Russian artists together.
I wrote this thoughts based on material which is closer to me and easier to explain, but unfortunately phenomena of counterfeit in art is not limited to Russia. Browsing fake images and names I meet similar ghost assigned to every land, so that after creating million dollars sales for the ghosts authors of the scam could come with hundreds of works to put money on their bank accounts. By nature I am very quite person and probably would not mind new edition of the art world if it were done with at least minimal degree of knowledge and professionalism. But when bunch of gangsters comes forward with their stolen billions and lack of knowledge of the grammar of any human language whatsoever; sorry I am against. Keep the world at least somewhat literate.
Please do not tell me about multiple links and books going decades away. Please provide ONE, just ONE article from scholarly peer reviewed academic source (I hope that you know what it is) Regarding any of mentioning from google search you may also see that there is something wrong. There are no books about Kalamkoff. If you mean one on sale in Amazon - you are welcome to try to buy it. By the way, I need to alert Amazon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladKSF (talk • contribs) 20:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
And by the way, here is the report of speed deletion of one of the Kalmakoff drafts.
http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Draft:Nicholas_Kalmakoff
For some reason there is no log. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladKSF (talk • contribs) 22:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked
What does one do if they are blocked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Try1st (talk • contribs) 16:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Try1st: Please see WP:GAB. Do you have another account that was blocked? GABgab 16:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Try1st If you're blocked, then a reason will have been given on the talkpage of the blocked account. You need to login to that account, and request an unblock using {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}. You would need to demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked, and how you would behave differently and contribute to the encyclopedia if unblocked. It is not acceptable to create a new account for yourself, as this is sockpuppetry. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
TINY MEEKER ALL-TIME BENCH PRESS WORLD RECORD
HELLO,
HOW OR WHY IS SOMEONE ABLE TO CHANGE OR TAKE DOWN MY WORLD RECORDS ON THE BENCH PRESS? I BROKE THE ALL-TIME RECORD 3 DIFFERENT TIMES.
HERE IS 1076
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7t7DIbK3LU
Choose weight and equipment to see the top 100 in each area:
Weight Class: Equipment: Sex: Division: Submit
Weight Class: SHW Equipment: Multi-Ply Gender: Male Division: Open
Rank Date State Name Total
1 2013-04-13 Texas Tiny Meeker 1076
2 2011-12-10 Ohio AJ Roberts 910
3 0000-00-00 California Roy Goodwin 843
4 0000-00-00 California Ray Bradshaw 843
5 2011-03-05 Connecticut Robert Mccray 840
6 2012-07-07 Ohio Tony Bolognone 825
7 2011-06-19 Alabama Jack Kottwitz 760
8 0000-00-00 Alabama Curtis Dennis 760
9 2014-03-08 Tennessee Ryan Hebron 755
10 2012-07-07 Ohio Josh Connelley 735
11 2013-05-25 Ohio Jake Anderson 725
12 2011-04-30 Ohio Matt Smith 725
13 2011-05-15 California Treston Shull 722
14 2012-01-28 Ohio Matt Smith 715
15 2011-11-12 Tennessee Mike Beaty 700
16 2014-03-08 Tennessee Jason Carter 620
17 2013-04-06 Oklahoma Chris Thompson 550
18 2014-10-25 Virginia Roscue Ware 540
19 2015-02-07 Tennessee Anthony Maddux 540
20 2010-10-02 Tennessee Scott Grandstaff 505
21 2010-06-06 Indiana Jesse Vest 475
22 2010-06-06 Indiana Jesse Vest 475
23 2010-06-06 Indiana Jesse Vest 475
24 0000-00-00 Georgia Kevin Crump 470
HERE IS 1080 AND 1102 FIRST MAN EVER AND ONLY TO BENCH PRESS 1100 POUNDS. 1102 -500 KILOS
youtube videos are not a reliable source...there would have to be an article by a reliable source describing what you've done..68.48.241.158 (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I work for a PR/Marketing agency working with ShoreTel, and they are interested in making some corrections to their company wikipedia page. A edit request has been made on the Talk page, but the page admin is being unresponsive and we are unable to contact him. Is there an alternative/acceptable way to make page edits?
Not done It was unreferenced promotional puffery. I have removed more advertisng of your "solutions" as well. Theroadislong (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When suggesting edits, it's useful to provide reliable third-party sources (sources not written by or commissioned by the company) for that information, as all information on Wikipedia is based on such sources. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Hjwerronen: There is no "page admin". Everyone here is able to edit most every article on Wikipedia. I've left a welcome message on your talk page that has links which might help you understand Wikipedia more. Dismas|(talk) 21:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pictures upload
I want to upload pictures of my city on it's Wikipedia page,so what can I do?? How to upload the pics?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.39.185.217 (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is the copyright status of said images and why? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you took the pictures yourself, see WP:UPLOAD. Note: You'll need to create an account. Dismas|(talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Does use of Template:Current attract more editor attention, making it easier for articles to develop faster?
I'm wondering if one reason the latter event has less coverage might be because it did not use the {{current}} template. (I know it was a much smaller event, but I'm also curious if the template can affect anything.)
Question: Would adding the {{current}} template somehow help attract more attention from editors to help articles develop more? Thanks~:) Zeniff (talk) 22:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Probably the biggest thing is that everyone survived that incident. Dismas|(talk) 23:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That seems dark Dismas.... I would think that coverage depends on the scope and depth of the incident (one such scope would be mortalities). -- The VoidwalkerDiscuss 01:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I think I sounded too specific by using that example. I mainly meant to ask about Template:Current in general. I mean, does the template itself help to attract editors in some way, maybe in some similar ways as the Main_Page or Watchlist do by showing recently-edited articles? I hope that makes sense? o.o? (As for the earlier example, I was only considering the template on there if a template like that can be used to attract more editors to help it develop, which is what made me wonder about the template in general) Zeniff (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
kalimahb Leonard
Hello my is kalimah Leonard i do not want no polgram in my house so im reporting yall thank you address is 2014 w 83rd st chicago Ill 60620 so please take it off thank you so much didnt ask for no polygram in my house — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.95.148 (talk) 00:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
kalimahb Leonard
Hello my is kalimah Leonard i do not want no polgram in my house so im reporting yall thank you address is 2014 w 83rd st chicago Ill 60620 so please take it off thank you so much didnt ask for no polygram in my house — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.95.148 (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]