Welcome to the dispute resolution noticeboard (DRN) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This is an informal place to resolve small content disputes as part of dispute resolution. It may also be used as a tool to direct certain discussions to more appropriate forums, such as requests for comment, or other noticeboards. You can ask a question on the talk page. This is an early stop for most disputes on Wikipedia. You are not required to participate, however, the case filer must participate in all aspects of the dispute or the matter will be considered failed. Any editor may volunteer! Click this button to add your name! You don't need to volunteer to help. Please feel free to comment below on any case. Be civil and remember; Maintain Wikipedia policy: it is usually a misuse of a talk page to continue to argue any point that has not met policy requirements. Editors must take particular care adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. This may also apply to some groups. Noticeboards should not be a substitute for talk pages. Editors are expected to have had extensive discussion on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) to work out the issues before coming to DRN.
|
Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
Rafida | Failed | Albertatiran (t) | 41 days, 1 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 11 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 11 hours |
Palm Springs Air Museum | Closed | BellamyBell (t) | 4 days, 12 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 12 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 12 hours |
Tesla Inc. | Closed | Emiya1980 (t) | 4 days, 8 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 11 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 11 hours |
Robert (doll) | Closed | Gabriellemcnell (t) | 1 days, 19 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 9 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 9 hours |
Undetectable.ai | Closed | Sesame119 (t) | 1 days, 16 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 8 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 8 hours |
Ibn Battuta | Closed | Jihanysta (t) | 1 days, 15 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 8 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 8 hours |
Eurovision Song Contest 2024 - Israel | Closed | PicturePerfect666 (t) | 1 days, 14 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 8 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 8 hours |
Aidi | New | Traumnovelle (t) | 20 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 13 hours | Traumnovelle (t) | 9 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 05:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Current disputes
Talk:G12 Vision#Low_quality_.22Concerns.22_section
Closed discussion |
---|
Fairchild Republic_A-10_Thunderbolt_II
Closed discussion |
---|
Pro-Beijing camp
Have you discussed this on a talk page?
Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.
Location of dispute
- Pro-Beijing camp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Users involved
Dispute overview
The user involved insisted naming the location of dispute to "親建制派", but not "建制派", which is offending since the earlier one is seldom use, but the later one is much more common.
Have you tried to resolve this previously?
Opening Talk, Help desk, but no appropriate response
How do you think we can help?
Stop naming the location of dispute to "親建制派", and respect naming the location of dispute to "建制派"
Summary of dispute by User:Lmmnhn
Pro-Beijing camp discussion
- Volunteer note - There has been discussion on the article talk page, but it has been brief and not has been long enough to warrant moderated discussion here. Also, the editors in question include two registered editors and an unregistered editor who may be one of the registered editors failing to log in. The filing unregistered editor has only identified one of the registered editors. The filing party is expected to list themselves as well as the other parties, and is also expected to notify the other parties, which has not been done. This case will be left in a new status for at least 24 hours to allow further discussion on the article talk page and to allow the other parties to be listed and notified. (If the filing party is a registered editor who failed to log in, they should identify themselves.) Robert McClenon (talk) 21:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Mahmoud Abbas#WP:RECENTISM
Have you discussed this on a talk page?
Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.
Location of dispute
- Talk:Mahmoud Abbas#WP:RECENTISM (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Users involved
Dispute overview
A politician made a statement, expressing a point of view and leading to controversy. Two editors with a well-known POV block the addition of a short paragraph to the article about this politician on the grounds that it is recentism.
Have you tried to resolve this previously?
Just talkpage discussion.
How do you think we can help?
Advice on the proper balance between the need to provide information about views and controversies and the danger of recentism. in general, and in this case specifically.