Content deleted Content added
(BOT) New discussion page: 2020 October 9. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/DRVClerk |
Bring back Daz Sampson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
||
====[[:2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season]]==== |
|||
:{{DRV links|2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season|xfd_page=Articles for deletion/2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season|article=}} |
|||
{{re|Spiderone}} has recently embarked on a heroic 'purge' of women's soccer articles. It would be wrong of me speculate here on his possible motives (!) However {{re|Fenix down}}, who has apparently been working in [[:WP:Tag team|tandem]] with Spiderone on this dubious project, closed this particular debate after rather less than the allotted seven days. As [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fenix_down&diff=982581887&oldid=981921782 others have noted], the rationale was faulty because there was no clear consensus, WP:NEASONS was met and none of the claims to WP:GNG were refuted (or even challenged) during the truncated discussion. [[User:Bring back Daz Sampson|Bring back Daz Sampson]] ([[User talk:Bring back Daz Sampson|talk]]) 17:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:21, 9 October 2020
9 October 2020
2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season
- 2013 Doncaster Rovers Belles L.F.C. season (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (restore)
@Spiderone: has recently embarked on a heroic 'purge' of women's soccer articles. It would be wrong of me speculate here on his possible motives (!) However @Fenix down:, who has apparently been working in tandem with Spiderone on this dubious project, closed this particular debate after rather less than the allotted seven days. As others have noted, the rationale was faulty because there was no clear consensus, WP:NEASONS was met and none of the claims to WP:GNG were refuted (or even challenged) during the truncated discussion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)