Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Mkativerata (talk | contribs) →Columbia Mall (Missouri): overturn |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:{{DRV links|Columbia Mall (Missouri)|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Mall (Missouri) (2nd nomination)|article=}} |
:{{DRV links|Columbia Mall (Missouri)|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Mall (Missouri) (2nd nomination)|article=}} |
||
I attempted to discuss this with the closing admin on July 25, he never answered and has since made edits including answering other people on his talk page. He closed the discussion as no consensus and I think there was a clear consensus to delete. Two out of the three keeps were impeached at the discussion as they simply cited [[WP:OUTCOMES]] which is not a reason for keeping. That leaves one keep that thought there was enough sourcing to meet [[WP:GNG]] to three deletes that did not think there was enough to meet WP:GNG. [[User:Me5000|Me5000]] ([[User talk:Me5000|talk]]) 02:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC) |
I attempted to discuss this with the closing admin on July 25, he never answered and has since made edits including answering other people on his talk page. He closed the discussion as no consensus and I think there was a clear consensus to delete. Two out of the three keeps were impeached at the discussion as they simply cited [[WP:OUTCOMES]] which is not a reason for keeping. That leaves one keep that thought there was enough sourcing to meet [[WP:GNG]] to three deletes that did not think there was enough to meet WP:GNG. [[User:Me5000|Me5000]] ([[User talk:Me5000|talk]]) 02:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Overturn''' and have it re-closed by an admin who does not comment at the DRV. If I still had the tools, I'd definitely have closed this as delete. But that's not the main reason why I'm !voting to overturn. The admin's contribution log says that they closed this AfD less than a minute after their previous one. They left no explanation for a 4-3 close. And then no explanation to the complainant here. That's not smoking gun evidence of course and I'm not trying to trout the admin; there can be all kinds of perfectly innocent explanations for each of those three occurrences. But it does lead me to doubt that a full reasoning process was applied to the closure, especially when I suspect a great many admins, if forced to write out reasons for the close, would have found a consensus to delete. --[[User:Mkativerata|Mkativerata]] ([[User talk:Mkativerata|talk]]) 11:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:24, 29 July 2014
29 July 2014
Columbia Mall (Missouri)
- Columbia Mall (Missouri) (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
I attempted to discuss this with the closing admin on July 25, he never answered and has since made edits including answering other people on his talk page. He closed the discussion as no consensus and I think there was a clear consensus to delete. Two out of the three keeps were impeached at the discussion as they simply cited WP:OUTCOMES which is not a reason for keeping. That leaves one keep that thought there was enough sourcing to meet WP:GNG to three deletes that did not think there was enough to meet WP:GNG. Me5000 (talk) 02:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Overturn and have it re-closed by an admin who does not comment at the DRV. If I still had the tools, I'd definitely have closed this as delete. But that's not the main reason why I'm !voting to overturn. The admin's contribution log says that they closed this AfD less than a minute after their previous one. They left no explanation for a 4-3 close. And then no explanation to the complainant here. That's not smoking gun evidence of course and I'm not trying to trout the admin; there can be all kinds of perfectly innocent explanations for each of those three occurrences. But it does lead me to doubt that a full reasoning process was applied to the closure, especially when I suspect a great many admins, if forced to write out reasons for the close, would have found a consensus to delete. --Mkativerata (talk) 11:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)