Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Talk:Genesis P-Orridge#RFC: is the idiosyncratic use of s/he and h/er acceptable in this article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Genesis P-Orridge#RFC: is the idiosyncratic use of s/he and h/er acceptable in this article? (Initiated 3153 days ago on 3 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 16:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Kuwait Airways#RFC: Should a threat of legal action by the Secretary of Transportation against the airline be included in the article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kuwait Airways#RFC: Should a threat of legal action by the Secretary of Transportation against the airline be included in the article? (Initiated 3143 days ago on 13 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Economic history#PRIMARYTOPIC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Economic history#PRIMARYTOPIC (Initiated 3165 days ago on 22 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{done}}--meaning, in this case, there really is nothing to close: the proposal was already a bit unclear, and there are some suggestions to tweak the article. Drmies (talk) 16:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Liberland#RFC: Infobox or not?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Liberland#RFC: Infobox or not? (Initiated 3152 days ago on 4 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Azov Battalion#Far-right, neo-Nazi as result of WP:NPOV rule ignoration
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Azov Battalion#Far-right, neo-Nazi as result of WP:NPOV rule ignoration (Initiated 3162 days ago on 25 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 17:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album)#RfC: Genres (Pop, rock)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album)#RfC: Genres (Pop, rock) (Initiated 3169 days ago on 18 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Russia–Syria–Iran–Iraq_coalition#If_not_deleted...merge
Would an uninvolved admin assess this merger proposal for closure? It's been open about a month and a half. LavaBaron (talk) 01:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{not done}} 2 people is not enough for a consensus. More participation is required. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 10:34, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nableezy
(Initiated 3129 days ago on 27 November 2015)
Can somebody please close this? Been open since November 27. nableezy - 22:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:The Legend of Zelda (1986 video game)#Requested move 01 November 2015
Could an experienced discussion closer please close Talk:The Legend of Zelda (1986 video game)#Requested move 01 November 2015? There have been no new comments added to this discussion since late November. Steel1943 (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} by Aervanath. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:The Legend of Zelda (1986 video game)#Requested move 01 November 2015
Could an experienced discussion closer please close Talk:The Legend of Zelda (1986 video game)#Requested move 01 November 2015? There have been no new comments added to this discussion since late November. Steel1943 (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} by Aervanath. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Muammar Gaddafi#RfC on Lede Image
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Muammar Gaddafi#RfC on Lede Image (Initiated 3152 days ago on 4 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 18:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:War in Donbass#RfC: Combatants
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:War in Donbass#RfC: Combatants (Initiated 3159 days ago on 28 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 19:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:McLaren MP4-30#RFC: Use of images
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:McLaren MP4-30#RFC: Use of images (Initiated 3163 days ago on 24 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 19:59, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain#RfC - Character reception before release
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain#RfC - Character reception before release (Initiated 665741 days ago on 26 September 0201)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- {{Already done}} Compromise was reached on talk page, no formal close needed. NE Ent 23:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Zombie#2015_merge_discussion_-_with_Zombie_.28folklore.29
This has been open since January. Strikes me as an obvious close but best be someone uninvolved to keep it all above board as somewhat controversial. (Initiated 3120 days ago on 6 December 2015)Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Gary Cooper#recent edits
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Gary Cooper#recent edits (Initiated 3170 days ago on 17 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive232#109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once
"Closure by admin requested for WP:BLPN discussion BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once". (Initiated 3157 days ago on 30 October 2015) Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- When this is closed it definitely needs to be closed in tandem with Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_October_16#Category:Climate_Change_deniers. I've read through a lot this morning and have no idea what to do; there's no strong consensus to do anything (i.e. there is zero agreement on what wording to actually use) but there is pretty strong consensus that the current situation is not sufficient for BLP. There are a lot of other factors at play here too; like how some BLP's are badly categorised anyway (which the rename may have compounded). My feeling is that we're I to close this I'd do a no-consensu o what to call the category, delete the cat under WP:BLPCAT and open a neutral RFC incorporating all of the main suggestions for category naming and inclusion criteria, to resolve this in detail. --Errant (chat!) 10:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for mentioning that parallel discussion. In addition to the immediate issue, there was also a procedural disagreement about whether WP:BLPCAT claims should be decided as a BLP Incident or as a Category for Discussion. I don't know if there is an answer to that jurisdictional question but it may matter since the the two conversations had starkly different consensuses. RevelationDirect (talk) 19:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- A bot changed the heading and text of this closure request to point to Archive231. That is the wrong URL. In fact the discussion is currently the first item at WP:BLPN. This confusion is my fault. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed the links. It looks like someone de-archived it... although it's also in the archive. Armbrust The Homunculus 21:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Requesting specifically admin closure on this contentious discussion, given the range of BLP articles involved (E.g.; Václav Klaus, Bill O'Reilly William Kininmonth, Pat Sajak). The last post was 9 days ago. (Initiated 3157 days ago on 30 October 2015) μηδείς (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- I think I'd be happy to close this having taken several goes at reading through - but actually I'd prefer another admin or two to be involved & help discuss the close. As far as I can see there is consensus that there is a problem but no actual viable solution agreed on (even the status quo). My close would be simply to remove the category to reset us back to zero and to draft/open a neutrally worded RFC at a sensible location to resolve this once and for all. Whatever it is closed as this will be contentious, and a major task, so I'd prefer assisstance. --Errant (chat!) 15:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} --slakr\ talk / 02:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 55#Owen 'Alik Shahadah
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 55#Owen 'Alik Shahadah (Initiated 3184 days ago on 3 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
{{Done|Unneeded}}
from what I can tell; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen 'Alik Shahadah resulted in a delete of the page in question. --slakr\ talk / 03:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essential Brands Group Australasia
This has gone well over the 7 days. LibStar (talk) 04:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_November_11#US_miniseries_decade_templates
Month-old TfD that is a reboot of one I previously closed; need someone uninvolved to take a look. Thanks. Opabinia regalis (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:User_pages#Rephrase_suggestion_to_WP:UP.23POLEMIC
Seeking a close of this RFC. With the canvassing that has taken place it's impossible to determine the consensus. There's no need in further wasting the communities time or the members who have signed up to the Request for feedback service.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
(Initiated 3144 days ago on 12 November 2015) AlbinoFerret 03:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- It was opened on November 12 but it should have been closed on November the 14th when it became clear that editors where being sent email correspondence to advertise the RFC [1][2]. In addition to this type of inappropriate canvassing they also advertised to the Wikiproject France in the aftermath of the Paris attacks seeking to manipulate any emotional sympathies for the France that it members may have [3]. Both types of Canvassing that were employed have poisoned the well. The consensus making process has been compromised and it should be closed.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 64#Images of victims and/or perps on crime pages
Uninvolved administrator needed. (Initiated 3163 days ago on 24 October 2015) --George Ho (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Almost no definite opinions have been offered, and George Ho relisted this on December 2, so closing this is very premature. --GRuban (talk) 03:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)#RfC: What claims are governed by WP:MEDRS?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)#RfC: What claims are governed by WP:MEDRS? (Initiated 3157 days ago on 30 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, this RfC was withdrawn in favor of another RfC which is still ongoing. Sunrise (talk) 05:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#RfC: format of boxing weight classes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#RfC: format of boxing weight classes (Initiated 3150 days ago on 6 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 17:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:New York Public Library#RFC: Should the further reading section of this article be trimmed?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:New York Public Library#RFC: Should the further reading section of this article be trimmed? (Initiated 3171 days ago on 16 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Frogman#RfC: Should this page be substantial reduced, stubbed, or deleted due to lack of inline references and other problems?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Frogman#RfC: Should this page be substantial reduced, stubbed, or deleted due to lack of inline references and other problems? (Initiated 3170 days ago on 17 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 23:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Denial_of_the_Holodomor#RfC:_Jeff_Coplon_in_the_.22Modern_Denial.22_section
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus here? Be warned: the discussion is somewhat long and covers various issues. (Initiated 3148 days ago on 8 November 2015) Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 16:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 23:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Wikipediocracy#RfC: Wording at top of 'activism' section
This RfC has run for a month and failed to demonstrate consensus for a change to the stable wording in the article. Could someone please close it? Thank you. — Scott • talk 17:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 00:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#GameRankings_proposal
Prefer a close from outside the Video games WikiProject regulars. czar 15:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 00:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Security review RfC
Following two compromised administrator accounts, I initiated an RfC on some changes to En.WP's password rules. The discussion has all but ended, would a kind admin look over and close it please, so I can get back to the WMF on what we want implemented on En.WP only. WormTT(talk) 08:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've done most of this, but there are a few sections I was too involved with and therefore can't close. This is almost done and would require just a few minutes for an uninvolved admin to complete it. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Already done}} AFAICT, this has now been fully closed by Beeblebrox and others... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 08:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Electronic_cigarette#Merge Discussion - Sub articles Safety, Aerosol, and E-liquid
Would an experienced editor please close this merge discussion? Its been open 7 days and no responses for 4 days. (Initiated 3119 days ago on 7 December 2015) Consensus should be easy to see, but outside closing is preferred to eliminate future issues. Please see [4] for an earlier discussion on the topic that prompted the merge discussion. AlbinoFerret 07:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} by JzG AlbinoFerret 23:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Challenging ISIL community sanction
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Challenging ISIL community sanction (Initiated 3138 days ago on 18 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done by In actu. Sam Walton (talk) 21:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Request topic ban for CheckersBoard
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Request topic ban for CheckersBoard (Initiated 3133 days ago on 23 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done by In actu. Sam Walton (talk) 21:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Cold War II#Move portions to other pages?
I need an accurate closing rationale. --George Ho (talk) 04:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done -Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 23:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G6_for_default_Article_Wizard_text
Discussion had turned stale. A clear consensus exists. 103.6.159.76 (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Been discussed for almost two weeks now and I think there's a clear consensus to add the criteria as a new example of a G6 to CSD (no need to renumber the criteria or anything too controversial). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Already done NE Ent 13:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame#Requested move 30 November 2015
Needs assessment by uninvolved admin. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 08:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done by Jenks24. Sam Walton (talk) 21:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Busted (band)#Busted_is
There has been a discussion as to whether 'Busted' should treated as a singular or plural noun throughout the article's introduction. Thank you. ~Peter Dzubay (talk) 01:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done NE Ent 13:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Caliphate#Sources
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Caliphate#Sources (Initiated 3161 days ago on 26 October 2015)? See the subsection Template talk:Caliphate#RfC, where the opening poster wrote:
Should the Template just list a select number of caliphates (of which there are 7 as can be seen on the template) or should it include every caliphate as can be seen in the article Caliphate (of which there are ~10 as can be seen in history).
Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{done}}-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 02:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:List_of_military_occupations#RfC:_Including_East_Jerusalem_and_Golan_Heights
Need an uninvolved party to access the consensus.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 22:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 18:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Christopher_Monckton,_3rd_Viscount_Monckton_of_Brenchley#RfC:_Mother_Jones_source
Request formal, uninvolved, administrator close because the article is a biography of a living person, and is subject to discretionary sanctions Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change, and although the consensus seems sufficiently clear that a formal close might not be necessary, two involved editors have argued for variant closures. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 19:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2015_December_8#File:Robert_Dear_in_a_mugshot.jpg
Please disposition this discussion about a mugshot open since December 8. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Grand Theft Auto: Vice City#Proposed merge with Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Official Soundtrack Box Set
Open since September 27, requesting formal closure czar 14:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 15:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 November 8#Category:Blue-eyed soul singers
(Initiated 3148 days ago on 8 November 2015)
(edit conflict) Discussion has been open since 8 November 2015. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 05:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} The Bushranger One ping only 02:31, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy#RfC about WP:NOTHERE
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy#RfC about WP:NOTHERE (Initiated 3154 days ago on 2 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Not done following rough on the link RFC, a new RFC has been started and is not ready for close yet.NE Ent 00:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Removed Not done template. There is no open RfC at Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy. Cunard (talk) 00:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- NE Ent is there another RFC, and does the one now on the page need closing? AlbinoFerret 17:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- No, I must have posted in the wrong section (here on ANRFC), sorry. Unfortunately don't remember which RFC I was looking at. NE Ent 19:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- NE Ent is there another RFC, and does the one now on the page need closing? AlbinoFerret 17:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 21:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:List_of_territorial_disputes#Merge_Proposal
Requesting a closure of this merge discussion. (Initiated 3134 days ago on 22 November 2015)-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 01:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 21:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Electronic cigarette#RFC Are these sources the same?
Would an experienced editor close this one. It should be easy and quick. (Initiated 3157 days ago on 30 October 2015). There is a second RFC on the same topic started the same day, but split off 4 days later that adds questions Talk:Electronic cigarette#Questions added after the start of the RfC above. It was started by a now topic banned editor.(Initiated 3153 days ago on 3 November 2015) This should be another easy quick close. AlbinoFerret 13:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- @AlbinoFerret: {{Done}}. Esquivalience t 01:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster#RfC: Should we use the terminology "ongoing" to describe Fukushima?
Although the consensus seems to be quite clear, it would be probably better to have a formal closure. Beagel (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 19:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Los Angeles Unified School District closure
Please disposition Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Los Angeles Unified School District closure. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC) (Initiated 3111 days ago on 15 December 2015)
Talk:Heavy metal music#RfC on image in infobox
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Heavy metal music#RfC on image in infobox (Initiated 3135 days ago on 21 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Killing of Cecil the lion#effect on conservation RFC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Killing of Cecil the lion#effect on conservation RFC (Initiated 3145 days ago on 11 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Done--Müdigkeit (talk) 11:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Jedediah Smith#Request for Comment
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jedediah Smith#Request for Comment (Initiated 3155 days ago on 1 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think this needs a formal closure. Sam Walton (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Nicholas A. Christakis#RCF: Recentism
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Nicholas A. Christakis#RCF: Recentism (Initiated 3137 days ago on 19 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- The discussion appears to have been productive and is slowly ongoing so I don't think it warrants an official close. Sam Walton (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Campus sexual assault#RfC on recent AAU campus climate survey
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#RfC on recent AAU campus climate survey (Initiated 3182 days ago on 5 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- The RFC was reposted Nov 17th. AlbinoFerret 23:50, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
{{Done}}--GRuban (talk) 20:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Martina Anderson#Categorisation
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Martina Anderson#Categorisation (Initiated 3147 days ago on 9 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Purple drank#RfC: Should the section labeled "Ingredients" be removed?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Purple drank#RfC: Should the section labeled "Ingredients" be removed? (Initiated 3117 days ago on 9 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Consensus and early close endorsed by sole supporter. Alsee (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Caste system in India#Brookings Institution is not RS
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Caste system in India#Brookings Institution is not RS (Initiated 3145 days ago on 11 November 2015)? See the subsection Talk:Caste system in India#RFC: Reliable Sources. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Umpqua Community College shooting#RfC: Is "Mass murder" or "Mass shooting" more appropriate in infobox?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Umpqua Community College shooting#RfC: Is "Mass murder" or "Mass shooting" more appropriate in infobox? (Initiated 3131 days ago on 25 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Watchdog.org#Summarization of multiple highly relevant, highly reliable independent third party assessments of ideology and partisanship
There are actually three virtually identical discussions that have failed consensus and should be closed:
- Talk:Watchdog.org#Independent assessments of partisanship
- Talk:Watchdog.org#Summarization of multiple highly relevant, highly reliable independent third party assessments of ideology and partisanship
- Talk:Watchdog.org#Summarization of multiple third party assessments of ideology
Thank you!-- Paid Editor, but not on the Watchdog.org topic -- User:009o9Talk 19:12, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- These three sections are article talk page discussions preliminary to an RfC, currently open. These discussions do not require a close and do not require a formal close. Kindly decline this request and archive. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 00:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done I skimmed the situation, and per Hugh's comment above these weren't RFC's. There appears to be no reason to apply closes. Alsee (talk) 20:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Marco Rubio#RFC: Should this material be left in the article without attribution?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Marco Rubio#RFC: Should this material be left in the article without attribution? (Initiated 3149 days ago on 7 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Already done}} Alsee (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks#RFc for major restructuring
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks#RFc for major restructuring (Initiated 3130 days ago on 26 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 20:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Carly Fiorina#RFC: Red outfit or blue outfit?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Carly Fiorina#RFC: Red outfit or blue outfit? (Initiated 3147 days ago on 9 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Fields Medal#Adding photo to each winner's row in the table
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Fields Medal#Adding photo to each winner's row in the table (Initiated 3140 days ago on 16 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Not done}} proposer cited that consensus was against proposal and planed to leave images out, boxed it up. AlbinoFerret 02:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Jesus#RfC: Which should go first: the historical account or the canonical Gospel account?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jesus#RfC: Which should go first: the historical account or the canonical Gospel account? (Initiated 3130 days ago on 26 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 03:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Kim Jong-un#Rfc: Use of non-free image
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kim Jong-un#Rfc: Use of non-free image (Initiated 3142 days ago on 14 November 2015)? Please consider the unclosed 2012 RfC Talk:Kim Jong-un/Archive 2#RFC:Should this biography contain a non-free image of the subject? in your close. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Schizoaffective disorder#Request for comment on the painting(s)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Schizoaffective disorder#Request for comment on the painting(s) (Initiated 3159 days ago on 28 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Edward VIII#RfC about cable text and expanded info on Duke's wartime activities
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Edward VIII#RfC about cable text and expanded info on Duke's wartime activities (Initiated 3131 days ago on 25 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 15:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Atlantis#Rfc: Atlantis as Fiction, Allegory
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Atlantis#Rfc: Atlantis as Fiction, Allegory (Initiated 3142 days ago on 14 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 16:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Campus sexual assault#RfC on recent AAU campus climate survey
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#RfC on recent AAU campus climate survey (Initiated 3141 days ago on 15 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Already done by GRuban AlbinoFerret 18:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Monarchy of Canada#Succession to the Canadian throne.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Monarchy of Canada#Succession to the Canadian throne. (Initiated 3138 days ago on 18 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Hinduism#RfC: Explain temples and pujas in lead?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hinduism#RfC: Explain temples and pujas in lead? (Initiated 3134 days ago on 22 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Unreferenced#References or sources
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Unreferenced#References or sources? See the subsection Template talk:Unreferenced#RfC: Should the current wording of this template be reverted to its prior wording? (Initiated 3148 days ago on 8 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 18:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Community portal#RfC: Add three blocks to the "help out" section
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Community portal#RfC: Add three blocks to the "help out" section (Initiated 3137 days ago on 19 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 19:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Infobox language#RfC: What should the language infobox display when editors have not found any speaker figures?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox language#RfC: What should the language infobox display when editors have not found any speaker figures? (Initiated 3127 days ago on 29 November 2015)? Thanks --mach 🙈🙉🙊 10:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 19:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive904#Continued Anti-Semitic concern trolling by User:Mrandrewnohome at the Reference Desks
Would an experienced editor admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive904#Continued Anti-Semitic concern trolling by User:Mrandrewnohome at the Reference Desks (Initiated 3151 days ago on 5 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Since this is on an admin board, shouldn’t an admin close it? AlbinoFerret 18:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- {{done}}. I, JethroBT drop me a line 08:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators/RFC on inactivity 2015
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators/RFC on inactivity 2015 (Initiated 3127 days ago on 29 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)#What does MEDRS cover?
Would an uninvolved admin please close this. Due to the topic under discussion an admin closure is preferred. A very involved editor (CFCF) has tried to close it. (Initiated 3154 days ago on 2 November 2015) The opening question was not signed so the bot has no refrence of when to removed the RFC header, but it has been open over 30 days. AlbinoFerret 22:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Closed by Nyttend. AlbinoFerret 15:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Iranian peoples#RfC: Should modern Azeris be described as one of the "Iranian peoples"?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Iranian peoples#RfC: Should modern Azeris be described as one of the "Iranian peoples"? (Initiated 3140 days ago on 16 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (definite or indefinite article at beginning of name)#RfC: Apply this Guideline to Redirects
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (definite or indefinite article at beginning of name)#RfC: Apply this Guideline to Redirects (Initiated 3137 days ago on 19 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#Is it OK for Wikipedia to choose its own pronunciation symbols?
This discussion is happening on three pages at once (NORNB, Help talk:IPA for English where it actually belongs, plus another at MOS:PRONUNCIATION). This NORNB tine of the fork has turned into another couple-of-editors-textwalling-against-each-other thing, and is actually in the wrong venue. WP:NOR pertains to the information content, not how WP presentationally wraps it. I.e., the actual content that is subject to core content policies is what the pronunciation(s) is/are. WP has multiple pronunciation transcription markup systems, and like our citation styles, this is WP-original metadata, not subject to WP:CORE. One of them is based on (mostly American) dictionary-style pronunciation keys: [pro-NUN-see-ay-shun]; the other loosely based on IPA. Both are synthetic and are internal matters, and not subject to WP:NOR / WP:V. As long as the pronunciation that emerges in the reader's mind is verifiable, it does not matter what markup wrapper we convey it with. Both of our extant pronunciation guide systems could be replaced tomorrow with something entirely different and even more arbitrary (even one consisting of entirely WP-invented orthography, though that would not of course be practical). While I agree that OP has a point – it's not wise for us to use a WP-modified version of IPA that conflicts with IPA norms that a linguist would expect – that's not an NOR matter, but a matter for consensus discussion at the IPA for English talk page. The discussion there should remain open until naturally resolved or a closure request is made, while the one at NORNB should be closed as no consensus / off topic. (Initiated 3160 days ago on 27 October 2015) — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 14:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Now both sides of the dispute have conceded that this won't be resolved as a WP:NOR issue, so this fork of the discussion has no reason to stay open at WP:NORNB, and can be centralized, finally, at Help talk:IPA for English, which is collectively trying to actually resolve it. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 11:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Now archivec at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 35#Is it OK for Wikipedia to choose its own pronunciation symbols?. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{done}}. I, JethroBT drop me a line 09:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Community discussion regarding disruptive edits to Heathenry-themed articles
Would an administrator assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Community discussion regarding disruptive edits to Heathenry-themed articles (Initiated 3145 days ago on 11 November 2015) and administer news of a topic ban to the user in question if that is what consensus calls for? Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive276#Community discussion regarding disruptive edits to Heathenry-themed articles (Initiated 3145 days ago on 11 November 2015)? See the subsection Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive276#Proposed topic ban. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{done}}. I, JethroBT drop me a line 10:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Political correctness#Definition of political correctness
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Political correctness#Definition of political correctness (Initiated 3150 days ago on 6 November 2015)? See Talk:Political correctness#Closing this RfC. The opening poster wrote: "Is political correctness a concept of not offending — especially the marginalized — in a community or is it primarily pejorative?" Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 November 28#Category:Academic pressure in East Asian cultures
Hello, I originally initiated a discussion on the renaming of Category:Academic pressure in East Asian cultures a few weeks back. I can see that the discussion appears to support a renaming of the category. I am an IP user so I do not have the power to close this discussion or rename it. I initially opened the discussion under the IP address of 137.147.55.166 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), you will notice that has changed today because my IP address always changes, I am still the same person I just have a different IP address. Could someone please close the discussion and rename the category please? It has completed its 7 day discussion as it finished last Saturday, thank you. (120.144.180.158 (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC))
- Hello, for those of you who might be sceptical of whether I am the original user who opened the discussion mentioned above, 137.147.55.166 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I can guarantee you I am the same person my IP address often changes so that's why I look like another user. I even mentioned this to another user on their talk page when I was using that IP address - User talk:Smileguy91#Vandalism. I just wanted to make sure everyone knew I am the same user, just a different IP address. (137.147.151.25 (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC))
{{close}} – Fayenatic London 15:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:In the news#Size of headings of nominations
Should be closed as soon as possible. George Ho (talk) 20:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
(Initiated 3123 days ago on 3 December 2015) AlbinoFerret 20:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Eagles of Death Metal#RfC: Anti-Israel Boycott - Roger Waters
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Eagles of Death Metal#RfC: Anti-Israel Boycott - Roger Waters (Initiated 3124 days ago on 2 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{close}} Dragons flight (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom#Possible hoax or hoaxes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom#Possible hoax or hoaxes (Initiated 3133 days ago on 23 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups
(Initiated 3126 days ago on 30 November 2015) RfC about deprecating the use of image galleries in infoboxes of ethnic group articles has been open for a month. Current consensus is that it has drawn enough participation to allow for a reasonably clear closure now. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#Proposal for the deletion of all the galleries of personalities from the infoboxes of articles about ethnic groups. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:2015 San Bernardino attack/Archive 5#RFC Victim names
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2015 San Bernardino attack/Archive 5#RFC Victim names (Initiated 3118 days ago on 8 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} moved from archive to close. Talk:2015_San_Bernardino_attack#RFC_Victim_names AlbinoFerret 02:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase II/RfC
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Was supposed to close on 17th, but it's still open now. Doesn't really need a formal closure but it's two days over and no one's cared. Needs to be closed ASAP. --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 04:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: RfC was officially opened on Nov. 29 – with the "false" 24-hour close (and the objections to that), it is now advisable that it stay open through at least Dec. 30. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 07:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Don't close this early, as the earlier close was controversial. However it will need a forma close. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Forgive me, but shouldn't it be closed by an uninvolved editor? Although, it's a site-wide affecting RfC, any competent editor can close it, no? --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 17:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- As far reaching as this RFC is, as a NAC, I wouldnt touch it alone. I think a team closure would be best since its so big and what it seeks to accomplish, just to make sure we get it right. AlbinoFerret 19:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Forgive me, but shouldn't it be closed by an uninvolved editor? Although, it's a site-wide affecting RfC, any competent editor can close it, no? --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 17:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Don't close this early, as the earlier close was controversial. However it will need a forma close. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Repeating: we've now reached the 30 day point. Any takers? - Dank (push to talk) 18:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think this should be closed by a team including at least one Bureaucrat and one Administrator, and have posted a request at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Request for closure: 2015 administrator election reform, Phase II. Wbm1058 (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Again, advise waiting until Dec. 30 to close for the reason I alluded to above... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Breakfast
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Breakfast (Initiated 3127 days ago on 29 November 2015)? NOTE: This is a FLOW board. There has been zero project activity in 14 months. This is an RFC to request the WMF end the Flow trial on the page. Running the RFC inside Flow was a mess. I've provided a participant summary below for assistance:
- 6 Support: Alsee Cullen328 BethNaught Doug_Weller Scott Fram
- 3 Oppose: Ottawahitech Bluerasberry WhatamIdoing
- 2 Tangential discussion with no attempt to !vote: HHill Quiddity_(WMF)
An affirmative close would authorizes a request to the WMF to end this Flow trial and return (the) conversations to a talk page. All that is needed is a close. I can take care of delivering the request to the appropriate WMF page. Alsee (talk) 16:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Doing... I will give it a go, since I am not sure of Flow and if templates working there I wont put a {{closing}} tag on it. This should let other closers know I am working on closing it. AlbinoFerret 09:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 09:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry MacAlmon (2nd nomination)
Discussion was relisted but I'm pretty sure there's a clear consensus to keep. Would have withdrawn my nomination earlier but assumed it would be closed as keep regardless. No need for this to be open for another week imo. Sam Walton (talk) 20:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{already done}} by clpo13. --Izno (talk) 03:38, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:In the news/Recurring items#Removal proposal: Toronto International Film Festival
There is a consensus. An uninvolved administrator may be needed. --George Ho (talk) 09:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Sam Walton (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)#RfC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)#RfC (Initiated 3150 days ago on 6 November 2015)? The opening poster wrote:
Current language on notability of athletes includes:
- Athletes from any sport are presumed notable if they have competed at the modern Olympic Games, including the Summer Olympics (since 1896) or the Winter Olympics (since 1924), or have won a medal at the Paralympic Games; e.g. Ian Thorpe or Laurentia Tan.
Should this be changed to:
- Individuals who have competed at any modern Olympic Games and who have either won a medal or won at least one heat or match in their event shall generally be considered notable. Any individual winning a medal at a Paralympics may also be generally considered to be notable.
Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Florida State Road 997#RJL reversions
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Florida State Road 997#RJL reversions (Initiated 3143 days ago on 13 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Not done}} There does not appear to be a discussion to judge. Sam Walton (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)#RfC Appropriate version for the new clause
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)#RfC Appropriate version for the new clause (Initiated 3155 days ago on 1 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- As an involved editor in this topic area, I'd like to request that the closer consider the preceding discussion as well, since it discusses the status of the previous RfC close. (AFAIK that close was never appealed at AN, but it probably should have been, as expressed in e.g. this comment by WhatamIdoing.) Sunrise (talk) 03:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Merging duplicate request. Sunrise (talk) 02:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Would an uninvolved admin please close this RFC. NAC closes on this page are not ideal as it is a contentious area. The closer should also look at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/Archive 19#Request for Comment: Country_of_Origin, an RFC that lead to the current one and established consensus for change. (Initiated 3155 days ago on 1 November 2015) AlbinoFerret 00:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Technical stuff |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Done by Fountains-of-Paris. Sunrise (talk) 02:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Fiona Graham#Age
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Fiona Graham#Age (Initiated 3138 days ago on 18 November 2015) AlbinoFerret 19:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)}}? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 19:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Greco-Italian War#RfC v2
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Greco-Italian War#RfC v2 (Initiated 3142 days ago on 14 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 22:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#RfC: Flag icons in professional boxing record tables
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#RfC: Flag icons in professional boxing record tables (Initiated 3120 days ago on 6 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 22:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Madison Young#RfC: is a Facebook post which documents the event first hand by an official witness sufficiently reliable?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Madison Young#RfC: is a Facebook post which documents the event first hand by an official witness sufficiently reliable? (Initiated 3117 days ago on 9 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 22:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Ed Sheeran#RfC: Should we add "(read as 'plus')"? after the symbol +
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ed Sheeran#RfC: Should we add "(read as 'plus')"? after the symbol + (Initiated 3121 days ago on 5 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 22:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Elagabalus#RfC: Should the subject's gender be changed, or is this presentism?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Elagabalus#RfC: Should the subject's gender be changed, or is this presentism? (Initiated 3118 days ago on 8 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 05:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Cold War II#RfC: Infobox or no infobox?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cold War II#RfC: Infobox or no infobox? (Initiated 3121 days ago on 5 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
{{Done}}--Mackensen (talk) 19:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Allie X Topic Ban Proposal
Consensus seems clear and discussion has halted, so an administrator is needed to review and close three topic bans, and possibly enforce the topic bans at the following incident report: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Allie X Topic Ban Proposal. I can help however I can. Thank you. (Initiated 3137 days ago on 19 November 2015) SanctuaryXStop talking in codes 15:35, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Allie X Topic Ban Proposal (Initiated 3137 days ago on 19 November 2015)? See the subsections Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Topic-Ban for WordSeventeen and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Topic ban for SanctuaryX. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- There is a subsection for Zpeopleheart as well at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Topic-Ban for Zpeopleheart Please resolve this quickly because there are still ongoing issues that need to be resolved ASAP. SanctuaryXStop talking in codes 14:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
In all actuality there are new comments and discussion points have been added since the last archiving for lack of discussion, so discussion may continue. So any admin or other proper person please unarchive the whole deal so we make discuss greely to make it gair for all parties. Thanks. WordSeventeen (talk) 20:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
-
- The only continued "discussion" was you opposing your own ban after removing your comments from my talk page. The discussion is very much stalled, with a pretty clear consensus for all three cases; it can still be closed regardless of whether it is archived or not. SanctuaryXStop talking in codes 21:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
sanx, I do note this comment that you placed here. You are though quite incorrect on the policies and protocol at wikipedia. Please do have a fantastic day©! WordSeventeen (talk) 21:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Wordseventeen, SanctuaryX is correct. In an issue that has been as tendentious as this one has been, it's a good idea to not suggest that someone is quite incorrect about policies and protocol unless you are going to back it up with diffs and links to specific policies. Kevin Gorman (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Discussion now at [6]. I, JethroBT drop me a line 00:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Not done}}. Stale – I don't think anyone is going to follow up on this one at this point: discussion died out long ago... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:St. Petersburg, Florida#RFC: The Burg
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:St. Petersburg, Florida#RFC: The Burg (Initiated 3149 days ago on 7 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- RFC was updated on (Initiated 3112 days ago on 14 December 2015) with a new RFC header, we might want to close both at the same time. AlbinoFerret 15:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach#RfC:Recent rewrites at Bach dropping large portions of biography and legacy should be restored into the article
- Request for closure on Johann Sebastian Bach which has had thirty-days and in ready to be closed
- Could someone visit this Talk page at Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach and do a close on this RfC. Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 15:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach#RfC:Recent rewrites at Bach dropping large portions of biography and legacy should be restored into the article (Initiated 3119 days ago on 7 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Francis Schonken (talk) 15:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:United States presidential election, 2016#Which photo of candidates for article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:United States presidential election, 2016#Which photo of candidates for article? (Initiated 3119 days ago on 7 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Done}} AlbinoFerret 23:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Egyptian crisis (2011–14)#RfC: "Egyptian crisis" as a title
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Egyptian crisis (2011–14)#RfC: "Egyptian crisis" as a title (Initiated 3127 days ago on 29 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Not done}} – There's not enough discussion there to be able to assess a "consensus" (it doesn't even get to a "No consensus" result – there's just not enough there...). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Canada#Great seal?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Canada#Great seal? (Initiated 3116 days ago on 10 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Already done}} – Closed by LavaBaron --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#RfC: Flag icons in professional boxing record tables
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#RfC: Flag icons in professional boxing record tables (Initiated 3120 days ago on 6 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Already done}} – Closed as "no consensus" by AlbinoFerret. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Review of Revision Deletion
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Review of Revision Deletion (Initiated 3095 days ago on 31 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Already done}} – Closed by Floquenbeam. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Spanish general election, 2015#RfC: Infobox: Seats vs. Votes
Would an editor please assess the consensus at Talk:Spanish general election, 2015#RfC: Infobox: Seats vs. Votes (Initiated 3095 days ago on 31 December 2015)? It's actually a WP:SNOWBALL case, but as the article's main author keeps disagreeing, we'd better have a formal closure. Thanks, PanchoS (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- {{Already done}} – WP:SNOW closed by Fountains-of-Paris. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:2012 Sydney anti-Islam film protests#It was a protest AND a riot. It should be called that.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:2012 Sydney anti-Islam film protests#It was a protest AND a riot. It should be called that. (Initiated 3115 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 18:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting#RfC: Show or hide the victims list?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting#RfC: Show or hide the victims list? (Initiated 3119 days ago on 7 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 18:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Islam and war#Merge discussion
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Islam and war#Merge discussion (Initiated 3123 days ago on 3 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 18:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Mariah Carey#RfC: Are "African American" categories supported by sources and policy?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Mariah Carey#RfC: Are "African American" categories supported by sources and policy? (Initiated 3128 days ago on 28 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 19:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help
This is long overdue and I think the consensus is pretty clear (trending toward support) on this one, however I would like an uninvolved editor to close it just to be on the safe side. Thanks. — kikichugirl oh hello! 18:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 19:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2015 November#Kim Davis (county clerk)
(Initiated 3147 days ago on 9 November 2015) - review of a move originally proposed 21 October 2015. Experience closing contentious discussions needed, and apologies in advance for the wall of text. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Discussion has waned past the point of productivity. Calidum T|C 01:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Total discussion stopped December 2, so it is stable and ready for closure. Tiggerjay (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Original close was voluntarily withdrawn. Listed for a new Admin close. (non-admin closure)Alsee (talk) 22:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done, finally, thanks to David Eppstein. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Alternative theories of the location of Great Moravia#Juraj Sklenár's view
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alternative theories of the location of Great Moravia#Juraj Sklenár's view (Initiated 3161 days ago on 26 October 2015)? See the subsection Talk:Alternative theories of the location of Great Moravia#RfC: Sklenár's theory.Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 00:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Template talk:Certification Table Entry#Sales figures: combined vs traditional
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Certification Table Entry#Sales figures: combined vs traditional (Initiated 3155 days ago on 1 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 00:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
CANVASS by User:Green_Cardamom
Requesting a closure of this old ANI discussion. The nominator is accused of systemic targeting a user (me) and nominating his articles at AFD. There was a boomerang, in fact. The discussion is old but not closed. (Initiated 3374 days ago on 27 March 2015) Mhhossein (talk) 19:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done just closed with no action ensuing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:NQ Mobile#Stock crash and lawsuit#What the company does#(Copied here from Talk:Nagle)#Whitewashing, NPOV and potential COI
Requesting closure on these old discussions as the only relevant discussion is that the article is out of date which I started and has now been lost. The company recently announced a new Showself entertainment brand and some divestitures [1] which I'd intended on working on. Rgeurts (talk) 15:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done really these do not need to be closed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Request for closure of Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_November_29#Category:Latter-day_Saints_portal
Please close the discussion and rename the category. Thanks.--Broter (talk) 11:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
You now have to only close the discussion and delete the old category.--Broter (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Norman Milliken#RfC: Should the article state that Milliken, Ontario is named after Norman Milliken?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Norman Milliken#RfC: Should the article state that Milliken, Ontario is named after Norman Milliken? (Initiated 3148 days ago on 8 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done AlbinoFerret 00:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Karbala#RFC for notability
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Karbala#RFC for notability (Initiated 3132 days ago on 24 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Jude Wanniski#RFC on description of the Laffer curve
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jude Wanniski#RFC on description of the Laffer curve (Initiated 3139 days ago on 17 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Portal talk:Current events/2015 November 17#APEC Philippines 2015 "Concentration camps"
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Portal talk:Current events/2015 November 17#APEC Philippines 2015 "Concentration camps" (Initiated 3133 days ago on 23 November 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)