The Requests for closure noticeboard is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Wikipedia. Formal closure by an uninvolved editor or administrator should be requested where consensus remains unclear, where the issue is a contentious one, or where there are wiki-wide implications.
Many discussions do not need formal closure and do not need to be listed here.
Many discussions result in a reasonably clear consensus, so if the consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion. The default length of a formal request for comment is 30 days (opened on or before 22 May 2024); if consensus becomes clear before that and discussion has slowed, then it may be closed early. However, editors usually wait at least a week after an RfC opens, unless the outcome is very obvious, so that there is enough time for a full discussion.
If consensus is unclear, then post a neutral request here for assistance.
Please ensure that your request for a close is brief and neutrally worded. Please include a link to the discussion. Do not use this board to continue the discussion in question. Be prepared to wait for someone to review the discussion. If you disagree with a particular closure, do not dispute it here. You can start discussion at the original page or request a Closure review at Administrators' noticeboard with a link to the discussion page and the policy-based reason you believe the closure should be overturned. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Closure review archive for previous closure reviews.
Any uninvolved editor may close most discussions, so long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale.
Because requests for closure made here are often those that are the most contentious, closing these discussions can be a significant responsibility. Closers should be familiar with all policies and guidelines that could apply to the given discussion. All closers should be prepared to fully discuss the closure rationale with any editors who have questions about the closure or the underlying policies, and to provide advice about where to discuss any remaining concerns that those editors may have.
A request for comment discussed how to appeal closures and whether an administrator can summarily overturn a non-administrator's closure. The consensus was that closures should not be reverted solely because the closer was not an administrator. However, special considerations apply for articles for deletion and move discussions—see Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions and Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for details.
Once a discussion listed on this page has been closed, please add {{Close}} or {{Done}} and a note to the request here, after which the request will be archived.
Requests for closure
Requests for comment
MediaWiki talk:Move-redirect-text#Redr
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at MediaWiki talk:Move-redirect-text#Redr (Initiated 3114 days ago on 12 December 2015)? —Godsy(TALKCONT) 19:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- This was going to be no consensus or consensus against, but discussion has renewed for a solution that will satisfy the opposition, so this should not be closed yet. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 19:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:David L. Jones#RFC: Inclusion of draft sections
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David L. Jones#RFC: Inclusion of draft sections (Initiated 3115 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Muhammad#What should be included for information regarding Aishas' marriage to Muhammad on the Muhammad article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Muhammad#What should be included for information regarding Aishas' marriage to Muhammad on the Muhammad article? (Initiated 3122 days ago on 4 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Closing of this RFC is past due, and the lack of a close has caused contention in dispute resolution. However, closure by a non-Muslim editor would be likely to result in further contention. Request closure by an uninvolved experienced Muslim editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list (Initiated 3115 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 65#RfC: Anime films and production companies
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 65#RfC: Anime films and production companies (Initiated 3109 days ago on 17 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Political correctness#Generally or primarily or something else
It was redated once and it's been ongoing for 54 days now, but discussion has pretty much died down. All of the monitors of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics voted for a third option, "often": 1, 2, 3 and 4. Current article lead hasn't existed for very long so nothing is yet "stable". --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done, discussion is closed. no result. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Undone I apologize for not explaining well enough but the point was to finally assess concensus as either or, not just closing it. I'll undo the closure in await for someone to actually decide either or. If there is no result it shall just be redated and reopened and the discussion and RfC continued because that is the proper procedure if there is no result yet, not closure. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Séralini affair#RfC Regarding content scope and neutrality
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Séralini affair#RfC Regarding content scope and neutrality (Initiated 3112 days ago on 14 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- not done as further edits seem to have overtaken the last participation in the RfC so as to make formal assessment unnecessary unless a participant requires. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I disagree with not closing the RfC. I think it is helpful to answer these two questions:
The discussion seems contentious which is why I'm not closing it myself. Cunard (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)1. Should we include the mention that Seralini's papers have been published in the peer-reviewed literature?
2. Should we include the studies which are discussed - or within the actual scope, of this article?
- I disagree with not closing the RfC. I think it is helpful to answer these two questions:
Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences#RfC: Change Default Math Appearance Setting to MathML
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences#RfC: Change Default Math Appearance Setting to MathML (Initiated 3113 days ago on 13 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- This should run for another week or two, as it was not properly advertized and got insufficient attention. --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - discussion has recently picked up again with a drive for more participants. Sam Walton (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources (Initiated 3094 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS? (Initiated 3089 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage (Initiated 3097 days ago on 29 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy#Request for comments
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy#Request for comments (Initiated 3089 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Josip Broz Tito#RfC January 2016
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Josip Broz Tito#RfC January 2016 (Initiated 3088 days ago on 7 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement."
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement." (Initiated 3080 days ago on 15 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Why is an early close being requested? Robert McClenon (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, maybe because, in the Proposals section, editors have reached an agreement. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate (Initiated 3085 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls
Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls (Initiated 3085 days ago on 10 January 2016)? 108.2.58.56 (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Super-easy close: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles (Initiated 3081 days ago on 14 January 2016)
We actually drafted and !voted on a 5-point consensus (with notes than need not be part of the close), at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Can we wrap this up?. While this could be allowed to just expired into the archives, it would be convenient to have a formal close, because the thread, and its derailed sub-thread about clarifying MoS's meaning with regard to formal/encyclopedic language, is holding up re-opening a "clean" discussion on the latter point, unpolluted by "winningest"-related bickering. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 08:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Two RFC's need closing
One is snow close Talk:Muhammad#Remove 'founder of islam' reference. The other needs a cool headed admin(preferably knowledgeable in Islam) who is willing to read the entire RFC and is able to deal with the fall out later on. Talk:Muhammad#RFC for opening sentence in the lede. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Backlogs
Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion#Old_business
There are number of old discussions going back to three from January 26th. Be aware that closing the nominator-only discussions with a delete can result in them being overturned at DRV (consensus leans that way) and for the unclear ones, there are three RFCs on whether relistings at MFD should be allowed at Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion (the relistings could be reverted without further explanation). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
This discussion forum has an extensive backlog with approximately 150 discussions that have yet to be closed, the oldest of which is from 2015 October 15. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Non-free content review
This discussion forum has an extensive backlog where the oldest active entry was started on 10 June 2015 ({{Initiated|10 June 2015}}), and at the time if me posting this request, the page has 163 discussions that have yet to be closed, several started over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please update {{Initiated}} below as the backlog is (slowly) taken care of.--Aervanath (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- (Initiated 3296 days ago on 13 June 2015)
- About 155 discussions still to be closed.
Since this discussion board is now deprecated, and there will be no new discussions opened there, I would appreciate some help clearing the backlog.--Aervanath (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- I just "did" about 3 of them. For the ones where I believe could really use more discussion, I've been relisting them on WP:FFD (but not in huge droves as that would overwhelm the daily subpages over there.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- We're getting close to having all these discussions closed. NFCR is now down to 100 open discussions. Also, in November, NFCR was shut down to new requests, directing new requests to WP:FFD; when all of the discussions are closed from NFCR, the noticeboard will be closed and marked as historical. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Finally Done. Thanks to everyone who helped clear the backlog. Steel1943 (talk) 15:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
XfD
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:Religious law in the United States
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:Taxonomic articles
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_11#Category:Bangladeshi_festivals
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_18#Category:Cancer_deaths_by_country
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_22#Category:Janitors
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_22#Category:War_in_Afghanistan_.282001.E2.80.93present.29
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:Cleaners
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:African_American_missionaries
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Wolverhampton_Council_elections
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Sheffield_Council_elections
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Mandarin-language_singers_of_China
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_26#Categories_for_regions_of_the_North_Island_and_South_Island_of_New_Zealand
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Establishments_in_the_District_of_Columbia
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Bishops_of_Split
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Teleportation
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Kingdom_of_Majorca
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Films_produced_by_Ralph_Guggenheim
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_3#The_entire_.22Political_bosses.22_category_tree
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_5#Category:Articles_containing_Simplified_Chinese-language_text
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_5#Category:State_Prize_laureates_.28Polish_People.27s_Republic.29
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_7#Category:Saints_of_Byzantine_Greece
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_8#Scottish_.26_Irish_politicians_by_century
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_9#Cultural_depictions
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_10#Small_Carniolan_categories
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_11#WikiProject_advice_pages
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_11#Category:Historical_subdivisions_of_the_Slovene_ethnic_territory.E2.80.8E
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#10th_century_in_Holy_Roman_Empire
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:Basketball_players_at_the_2015_NCAA_Men.27s_Division_I_Final_Four
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:Pages_using_deprecated_coordinates_format
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:History_of_the_Ljubljana_Marshes
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:City_attorneys
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_14#Category:Military_units_and_formations_in_West_Yorkshire
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_14#Category:Organizations_by_country_and_subject
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_14#Category:Professional_associations_by_profession
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_15#Regional_writers
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_15#Category:Members_of_the_Faculty_of_Advocates.E2.80.8E
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_15#History_of_Podgorica
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_15#Category:Organisations_based_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_membership
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_16#Category:Ancient_Roman_provincials.E2.80.8E
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_16#Category:People_from_the_City_of_Fairfield
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_17#Category:Presidents_of_the_Association_for_Asian_Studies
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_17#Category:Members_of_professional_organizations
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_17#Category:Ancient_Christians
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_17#Category:NOAA_Weather_Radio
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Administrative
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Martin Hogbin
Would an administrator please assess the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Martin Hogbin? Thanks, --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- The discussion is now located at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive278#Martin Hogbin. This is an ongoing issue. Can it be de-archived and evaluated? --Sammy1339 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Requested moves
Talk:Taharrush jamai#Requested move 1 February 2016
I'm looking for an admin to close this move request, because of the sensitive nature of it. It's worth noting that a few new or little-used accounts/IPs have commented on both sides. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:St. Mirren F.C.#Requested_move_20_January_2016
Open for 26 days (minimum = 7 days). Discussion stalled: last comment 4 days ago, previous comment 3 days before that. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done Ncmvocalist (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Genesis creation narrative#Requested move 22 January 2016
Open for 25 days. The discussion has petered out, and there is a clear consensus that it can be closed now. But this is a highly controversial issue, and has been the subject of numerous previous requests. Looking for an experienced, careful, and brave admin to close the discussion. StAnselm (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)