AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs) OneClickArchiver archived Talk:Charli XCX#RFC: MOS:SURNAME and articles related to Charli XCX to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 20#Talk:Charli XCX#RFC: MOS:SURNA... |
AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs) OneClickArchiver archived Talk:Panagiotis Kone#RfC: Does the source support labeling Kone as ethnic Greek? to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 20#Talk:Panagiotis K... |
||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
====[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS?]]==== |
====[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS?]]==== |
||
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS?]] {{Initiated|6 January 2016}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC) |
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS?]] {{Initiated|6 January 2016}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
====[[Talk:Panagiotis Kone#RfC: Does the source support labeling Kone as ethnic Greek?]]==== |
|||
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Talk:Panagiotis Kone#RfC: Does the source support labeling Kone as ethnic Greek?]] {{Initiated|7 January 2016|done=yes}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
* {{Done}} – though it's more accurate to label this "moot". Anyway, closed either way. (Though another one that didn't belong listed here, and likely didn't need a "formal" close...) --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 20:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
====[[Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage]]==== |
====[[Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage]]==== |
Revision as of 02:26, 14 February 2016
The Requests for closure noticeboard is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Wikipedia. Formal closure by an uninvolved editor or administrator should be requested where consensus remains unclear, where the issue is a contentious one, or where there are wiki-wide implications.
Many discussions do not need formal closure and do not need to be listed here.
Many discussions result in a reasonably clear consensus, so if the consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion. The default length of a formal request for comment is 30 days (opened on or before 22 May 2024); if consensus becomes clear before that and discussion has slowed, then it may be closed early. However, editors usually wait at least a week after an RfC opens, unless the outcome is very obvious, so that there is enough time for a full discussion.
If consensus is unclear, then post a neutral request here for assistance.
Please ensure that your request for a close is brief and neutrally worded. Please include a link to the discussion. Do not use this board to continue the discussion in question. Be prepared to wait for someone to review the discussion. If you disagree with a particular closure, do not dispute it here. You can start discussion at the original page or request a Closure review at Administrators' noticeboard with a link to the discussion page and the policy-based reason you believe the closure should be overturned. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Closure review archive for previous closure reviews.
Any uninvolved editor may close most discussions, so long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale.
Because requests for closure made here are often those that are the most contentious, closing these discussions can be a significant responsibility. Closers should be familiar with all policies and guidelines that could apply to the given discussion. All closers should be prepared to fully discuss the closure rationale with any editors who have questions about the closure or the underlying policies, and to provide advice about where to discuss any remaining concerns that those editors may have.
A request for comment discussed how to appeal closures and whether an administrator can summarily overturn a non-administrator's closure. The consensus was that closures should not be reverted solely because the closer was not an administrator. However, special considerations apply for articles for deletion and move discussions—see Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions and Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for details.
Once a discussion listed on this page has been closed, please add {{Close}} or {{Done}} and a note to the request here, after which the request will be archived.
Requests for closure
Requests for comment
MediaWiki talk:Move-redirect-text#Redr
Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at MediaWiki talk:Move-redirect-text#Redr (Initiated 3114 days ago on 12 December 2015)? —Godsy(TALKCONT) 19:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:David L. Jones#RFC: Inclusion of draft sections
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David L. Jones#RFC: Inclusion of draft sections (Initiated 3115 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Muhammad#What should be included for information regarding Aishas' marriage to Muhammad on the Muhammad article?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Muhammad#What should be included for information regarding Aishas' marriage to Muhammad on the Muhammad article? (Initiated 3122 days ago on 4 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Closing of this RFC is past due, and the lack of a close has caused contention in dispute resolution. However, closure by a non-Muslim editor would be likely to result in further contention. Request closure by an uninvolved experienced Muslim editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list (Initiated 3115 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 65#RfC: Anime films and production companies
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 65#RfC: Anime films and production companies (Initiated 3109 days ago on 17 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Political correctness#Generally or primarily or something else
It was redated once and it's been ongoing for 54 days now, but discussion has pretty much died down. All of the monitors of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics voted for a third option, "often": 1, 2, 3 and 4. Current article lead hasn't existed for very long so nothing is yet "stable". --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done, discussion is closed. no result. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Undone I apologize for not explaining well enough but the point was to finally assess concensus as either or, not just closing it. I'll undo the closure in await for someone to actually decide either or. If there is no result it shall just be redated and reopened and the discussion and RfC continued because that is the proper procedure if there is no result yet, not closure. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Séralini affair#RfC Regarding content scope and neutrality
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Séralini affair#RfC Regarding content scope and neutrality (Initiated 3112 days ago on 14 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences#RfC: Change Default Math Appearance Setting to MathML
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences#RfC: Change Default Math Appearance Setting to MathML (Initiated 3113 days ago on 13 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- This should run for another week or two, as it was not properly advertized and got insufficient attention. --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - discussion has recently picked up again with a drive for more participants. Sam Walton (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:British Empire#RfC: Should the term "superpower" be mentioned regarding the latter years of the British Empire?
Although its been up a week [1], the date in the RFC has been altered [2] to give the impression it has only just been started. N0n3up clearly doesn't accept a lack of consensus for his proposal and is opposing closure, I think this needs a neutral admin to review the discussion and sentence the closure (or not) as they deem appropriate. As a neutral 3rd party looking at some of the comments being made eg Do that, and it will be reverted. This act will be considered an aggression and the assertion that only he can close the RFC I can see trouble ahead. Hopefully a steely eyed admin can intervene and pour oil on troubled waters. Pinging @Snowded: to let him know I've done this. WCMemail 17:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Need a neutral review but even the RfC is tedious, the obsession with inserting superpower against consensus has been running for a coupe of months now. I didn't spot the change of date that really is gaming ----Snowded TALK 00:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wee Kudpung กุดผึ้ง, with all due respect, I would just like to say that this wouldn't had happened if Snowded and Juanriley (two of the stalkers who've constantly slithered towards my edits) wouldn't had been involved regardless of the outcome of the Rfc and discussions. Now personally, I am very accepting with others disagreeing and even reverting my edits. What I am not okay with is Snowded's constant stalking and manipulation of my edits. If you check the British Empire Talk page, you'll see that others didn't respond as much as Snowded did because he was constantly fighting back by constantly posting against my edits that almost looks like a backlash (if you want more examples of his and Juanriley's stalking, leave me a message in my talk page, I promise to take the time to list them all). Yes, I agree that the Rfc ws going for a couple of days, but recently I hadn't had the time to post up-to-date, and besides, it should be deleted in 20 days or so by a bot and not to mention that Wikipedia has no deadlines. (N0n3up (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC))
- I would ordinarily have left the RFC to run for 30 days or more before resorting to here. The comments made by N0n3up with the bad faith accusations of "stalking" and manipulation not to mention the comments referenced above convinced me this was becoming toxic and required an admin to look at. I was very tempted to take this to WP:ANI. WCMemail 01:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wee Apparently you didn't look at the history involved in my previous post. I would normally concentrate on the topic in hand, but I felt that it was necessary to bring this into light because this dilemma had been one problem in the discussion page in BE talk page. I agree I shouldn't have posted this here and should've probably saved it for ANI. But if you think I posted in bad faith, you're wrong. I also covered the loose ends due to my lack of time and etc.. Again, recheck what I've said, I'm not accusing anyone, I'm simply stating what happened. I apologize for the inconvenience this provoked. (N0n3up (talk) 02:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC))
- User:Wiki-Ed and User:Snowded have done an admirable job in trying to keep a well written article intact. On this particular issue I agree with them--though I think we have had disagreements in the past. I hesitated to post here (and there) lately because User:N0n3up will say I am stalking him. In fact, I think this is the first article we came to loggerheads on and lately again I have attempted to keep my presence minimal where and when he starts off on a tirade on other articles we both apparently watch. Juan Riley (talk) 02:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Juan Riley First of all, save it for ANI, this is regarding the Rfc. Second, your edits in British Empire, United Kingdom and the American Civil War, France, Suez Crisis, List of pioneers in computer science and Treaty of Versailles say otherwise, All of which you began to edit since I started to edit in them, all beginning in British Empire. It's only a matter of finding your name in the edit history of each article. Again, this is regarding the Rfc, in which I made a mistake mentioning this. (N0n3up (talk) 02:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC))
- Nuff said. Juan Riley (talk) 02:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
I recommend that the Rfc be allowed to run its (30-day) course. Then place a 1-year moratorium, upon closure of the Rfc. GoodDay (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with GoodDay here this is the most diplomatic way to handle this situation. Reb1981 (talk) 00:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Though it hasn't been 30 days, it's about 21 days not including the pre-Rfc related discussion, with absolutely no chance of a consensus for superpower being added to the article. If we include the pre-Rfc discussion? This whole super power dispute has been going on since October 2015. Recommend closing that Rfc now & placing a 1-year moratorium on allowing the topic being raised again. GoodDay (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources (Initiated 3094 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Habib Ali al-Jifri#RfC: Is the critical content neutral and well sourced?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Habib Ali al-Jifri#RfC: Is the critical content neutral and well sourced? (Initiated 3093 days ago on 2 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson#RFC
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson#RFC (Initiated 3089 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS? (Initiated 3089 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage (Initiated 3097 days ago on 29 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy#Request for comments
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy#Request for comments (Initiated 3089 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Josip Broz Tito#RfC January 2016
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Josip Broz Tito#RfC January 2016 (Initiated 3088 days ago on 7 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Slano Blato Landslide#RFC: Should "Salt Mud Slide" be moved to "Slano Blato landslide"?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Slano Blato Landslide#RFC: Should "Salt Mud Slide" be moved to "Slano Blato landslide"? (Initiated 3086 days ago on 9 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Media franchise#Alright, Bring It!
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Media franchise#Alright, Bring It! (Initiated 3099 days ago on 27 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Ethnocracy#RfC: material that does not explicitly refer to ethnocracy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ethnocracy#RfC: material that does not explicitly refer to ethnocracy (Initiated 3094 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Martin McGuinness#Monarch/ appointed by
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Martin McGuinness#Monarch/ appointed by (Initiated 0 days ago on 21 June 2024)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done Robert McClenon (talk) 03:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Proposed merge with Ammon Bundy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Proposed merge with Ammon Bundy (Initiated 3085 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015#RfC: Lead - full term, etc
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015#RfC: Lead - full term, etc (Initiated 3089 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Antisemitism in the United States#RFC - Antisemitic incidents
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antisemitism in the United States#RFC - Antisemitic incidents (Initiated 3088 days ago on 7 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Done Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Template talk:ShadowsCommons#Deliberate shadowing
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:ShadowsCommons#Deliberate shadowing (Initiated 3092 days ago on 3 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement."
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement." (Initiated 3080 days ago on 15 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Why is an early close being requested? Robert McClenon (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, maybe because, in the Proposals section, editors have reached an agreement. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#"Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a gallery of images of group members"
Could we have an experienced editor or admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#"Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a gallery of images of group members" (Initiated 3087 days ago on 8 January 2016)? Considering the backlog here, I thought it prudent to apply a day early for this biggie. Thank you. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate (Initiated 3085 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls
Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls (Initiated 3085 days ago on 10 January 2016)? 108.2.58.56 (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Taharrush jamai#Requested move 1 February 2016
I'm looking for an admin to close this move request, because of the sensitive nature of it. It's worth noting that a few new or little-used accounts/IPs have commented on both sides. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:List of state leaders in 2015#Dispute over the designation of Queen's Representative
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus at this RfC? The debate has come to a natural end, the conclusion being that zero changes should now be made—as the alternatives cannot be agreed upon. (Initiated 3066 days ago on 29 January 2016)? Thank-you, --Neve–selbert 12:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Backlogs
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
This discussion forum has an extensive backlog with approximately 150 discussions that have yet to be closed, the oldest of which is from 2015 October 15. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Non-free content review
This discussion forum has an extensive backlog where the oldest active entry was started on 10 June 2015 ({{Initiated|10 June 2015}}), and at the time if me posting this request, the page has 163 discussions that have yet to be closed, several started over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please update {{Initiated}} below as the backlog is (slowly) taken care of.--Aervanath (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- (Initiated 3296 days ago on 13 June 2015)
- About 155 discussions still to be closed.
Since this discussion board is now deprecated, and there will be no new discussions opened there, I would appreciate some help clearing the backlog.--Aervanath (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- I just "did" about 3 of them. For the ones where I believe could really use more discussion, I've been relisting them on WP:FFD (but not in huge droves as that would overwhelm the daily subpages over there.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- We're getting close to having all these discussions closed. NFCR is now down to 100 open discussions. Also, in November, NFCR was shut down to new requests, directing new requests to WP:FFD; when all of the discussions are closed from NFCR, the noticeboard will be closed and marked as historical. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
XfD
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:Religious law in the United States
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:19th-century male military personnel & 19th-century businessmen
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:Taxonomic articles
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_11#Category:Bangladeshi_festivals
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_15#Category:Founders_of_companies_of_the_United_States
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_18#Category:Cancer_deaths_by_country
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_22#Category:Janitors
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_22#Category:War_in_Afghanistan_.282001.E2.80.93present.29
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:Cleaners
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:African_American_missionaries
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Contemporary_Italian_history
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Wolverhampton_Council_elections
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Sheffield_Council_elections
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Mandarin-language_singers_of_China
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_26#Irish_poems_by_century
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_26#Categories_for_regions_of_the_North_Island_and_South_Island_of_New_Zealand
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Establishments_in_the_District_of_Columbia
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Bishops_of_Split
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Teleportation
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Kingdom_of_Majorca
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_2#Category:Films_produced_by_Ralph_Guggenheim
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_3#The_entire_.22Political_bosses.22_category_tree
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_5#Category:Categories_by_geographical_location
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_5#Category:Articles_containing_Simplified_Chinese-language_text
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_5#Category:State_Prize_laureates_.28Polish_People.27s_Republic.29
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_7#Category:Saints_of_Byzantine_Greece
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_8#Scottish_.26_Irish_politicians_by_century
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_9#Cultural_depictions
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_9#Category:LGBT_history_by_century
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_10#Small_Carniolan_categories
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_11#WikiProject_advice_pages
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_11#Category:Historical_subdivisions_of_the_Slovene_ethnic_territory.E2.80.8E
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#10th_century_in_Holy_Roman_Empire
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:Basketball_players_at_the_2015_NCAA_Men.27s_Division_I_Final_Four
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:Pages_using_deprecated_coordinates_format
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:History_of_the_Ljubljana_Marshes
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_13#Category:City_attorneys
Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Administrative
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#RFC review request: Request for Comment: Country of Origin
This has been open for over a week. There's still some discussion, but at this point I think its productivity is coming to an end. The main complication is that an admin already attempted to resolve the dispute, but didn't actually close the discussion or provide an answer to the initial question. To help avoid any doubt in resolving this issue, I'd like to request that the closer explicitly note what the consensus is about the RfC being appealed. Thanks, Sunrise (talk) 09:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Martin Hogbin
Would an administrator please assess the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Martin Hogbin? Thanks, --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- The discussion is now located at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive278#Martin Hogbin. This is an ongoing issue. Can it be de-archived and evaluated? --Sammy1339 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legacypac's persistent bullying
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legacypac's persistent bullying (Initiated 3079 days ago on 16 January 2016)? See for example the subsection Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal for Resolution. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Already done. Closed by Ched. Note: Now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive913#Legacypac's persistent bullying. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)