Content deleted Content added
Michaelas10 (talk | contribs) m →[[Wipipedia]]: +Delete and salt |
→[[Wipipedia]]: Keep |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete''' - fails [[WP:WEB]] since I can't find any coverage by reliable sources, awards won or anything else notable. [[User:Jayden54|Jayden54]] 19:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - fails [[WP:WEB]] since I can't find any coverage by reliable sources, awards won or anything else notable. [[User:Jayden54|Jayden54]] 19:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete and salt'''. I believe that the previous AfD was completely unfair, and people were !voting keep because of the matter of the subject itself, while completely ignoring [[WP:WEB]]. This isn't notable, period. '''<span style="background:#000">[[User:Michaelas10|<span style="color:#fff">Michaelas10</span>]] [[User talk:Michaelas10|<span style="color:#fff">(Talk)</span>]]</span>''' 22:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete and salt'''. I believe that the previous AfD was completely unfair, and people were !voting keep because of the matter of the subject itself, while completely ignoring [[WP:WEB]]. This isn't notable, period. '''<span style="background:#000">[[User:Michaelas10|<span style="color:#fff">Michaelas10</span>]] [[User talk:Michaelas10|<span style="color:#fff">(Talk)</span>]]</span>''' 22:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Firstly, [[WP:Web]] is not policy. It is inadmissible to delete something because of guidelines. What policy does it fail to meet? Secondly, this is not a vote; it is a debate. The closing admin looked at the debate and decided not to delete, so the stuff about "a bunch of [[WP:ILIKEIT]]-based votes" is irrelevant.--[[User:Brownlee|Brownlee]] 13:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:18, 22 December 2006
Wipipedia
- Previous AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wipipedia
del, nonnotabke wiki. Since its first momination the article failed to addresss the concerns of notability and verifiability. `'mikkanarxi 19:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Reading the first debate, I'm leaning towards delete. The concerns were not addressed. Some had an WP:ILIKEIT stance, some wanted to keep the article because "WP:WEB is not policy, so it has no relevance". You'll have to do better than that. Also, whether the "specialist wikis" thrive is not really our business. Punkmorten 19:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence from WP:RS that this site meets WP:WEB. Yes, it's not policy, but there's a reason it's around, and it's not to be contravened by a bunch of WP:ILIKEIT-based votes. --Kinu t/c 19:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:WEB since I can't find any coverage by reliable sources, awards won or anything else notable. Jayden54 19:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. I believe that the previous AfD was completely unfair, and people were !voting keep because of the matter of the subject itself, while completely ignoring WP:WEB. This isn't notable, period. Michaelas10 (Talk) 22:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Firstly, WP:Web is not policy. It is inadmissible to delete something because of guidelines. What policy does it fail to meet? Secondly, this is not a vote; it is a debate. The closing admin looked at the debate and decided not to delete, so the stuff about "a bunch of WP:ILIKEIT-based votes" is irrelevant.--Brownlee 13:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)