- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 11:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Untitled 2011 AMC television series
- Untitled 2011 AMC television series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:CRYSTAL. Should probably be userfied and recreated when there's a name and a more definite premiere date. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not only does it fail Wp:CRYSTAL, it's also probably the first example of a TV series that fails Wp:HAMMER (which shouldn't be a surprise, since it's "scheduled to premier… in 2011"). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 10:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it is pure speculation and because it does not have a title it fails TenPoundHammer's Law also. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. WP:CRYSTAL says:
- "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred."
- Nothing in the article is unverifiable. None of it is speculation. It's all sourced, verifiable, and notable, so it meets WP:CRYSTAL. If you still think it violates the policy, you need to actually explain. You can't just link to the page. TenPoundHammer's law only refers to articles that are made up of speculation and rumors, and this isn't. —Gendralman (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge this article and The Killing (TV series), which is about the original Danish show. (Its article needs sources but that should not be a problem.) When the new show airs and is reviewed then write an article on it. Right now there is not enough information for an article on the new show alone, even if there are sources giving the little there is. Borock (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A rare non-album example of WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL, but it seems that the guideline needs to be rewritten along the lines of WP:NFF to make it more explicit that mere verifiability of the existence of projects is not sufficient for an article.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.