Content deleted Content added
Miami33139 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' [[WP:BURDEN]], no sources in the article and it has had a week to get them added. Wikipedia is not a software catalog. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 04:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' [[WP:BURDEN]], no sources in the article and it has had a week to get them added. Wikipedia is not a software catalog. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 04:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''EXTRA STRONG DELETE'''. I'm waiting in the wings for my Wiki-stalking friend to attempt to counter me, but I'm guessing he'll just make some bad faith accusations and then find himself unable to produce any evidence of non-trivial coverage of this subject, once again. [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 22:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:21, 27 September 2009
TundraDraw
- TundraDraw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, appears to be non-notable software, was not able to locate any significant independent coverage of it. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC).
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete WP:BURDEN, no sources in the article and it has had a week to get them added. Wikipedia is not a software catalog. Miami33139 (talk) 04:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- EXTRA STRONG DELETE. I'm waiting in the wings for my Wiki-stalking friend to attempt to counter me, but I'm guessing he'll just make some bad faith accusations and then find himself unable to produce any evidence of non-trivial coverage of this subject, once again. JBsupreme (talk) 22:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)