Content deleted Content added
fixed |
LinguistAtLarge (talk | contribs) Added comment |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*'''Delete'''- agree with last comment. This reads less like an encyclopaedia article than an extract from a "how-to" manual, that would be more suitable for an undergraduate handbook than an encyclopaedia.[[User:Vorbee|Vorbee]] ([[User talk:Vorbee|talk]]) 15:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''- agree with last comment. This reads less like an encyclopaedia article than an extract from a "how-to" manual, that would be more suitable for an undergraduate handbook than an encyclopaedia.[[User:Vorbee|Vorbee]] ([[User talk:Vorbee|talk]]) 15:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''delete''' per [[WP:NOTHOWTO]]. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] ([[User talk:Mangoe|talk]]) 16:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC) |
*'''delete''' per [[WP:NOTHOWTO]]. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] ([[User talk:Mangoe|talk]]) 16:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
* '''Comment''' The article appears to have been written for the purpose of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Use_of_Quotations_within_Your_Dissertations&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=794494299&oldid=794493372 spamming/linking to a site] that offers dissertation services/help. I applaud Bfpage's efforts to improve the article. At the same time it seems there is quite a bit of overlap with existing articles. See [[Thesis#Style]] and [[Style guide]] for example. If we get into the full contents of the style guide, it would seem to enter "how to" territory. —<b style="border:1px solid #C5BE83;background-color:#F5DEB3;font-size:0.9em;"> [[User:LinguistAtLarge|LinguistAtLarge]] • [[User talk:LinguistAtLarge|Talk]] </b> 21:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:51, 8 August 2017
The Use of Quotations within Your Dissertations
- The Use of Quotations within Your Dissertations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essay, which is a blatant WP:NOT violation. RileyBugz会話 投稿記録 11:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
KeepRename to what is written now in the first sentence a- it is still undergoing improvement. Bfpage (talk) 11:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject is inherently unsuitable for Wikipedia per WP:NOTHOWTO. No amount of improvement can change that. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The article ends with an advertisement and Wikipedia is not a "how to" guide. So far all of this editor's contributions have ended with advertising PhD Dissertation.co.uk. Bakilas (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-encyclopaedic WP:NOTHOWTO content. AllyD (talk) 11:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete- agree with last comment. This reads less like an encyclopaedia article than an extract from a "how-to" manual, that would be more suitable for an undergraduate handbook than an encyclopaedia.Vorbee (talk) 15:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- delete per WP:NOTHOWTO. Mangoe (talk) 16:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The article appears to have been written for the purpose of spamming/linking to a site that offers dissertation services/help. I applaud Bfpage's efforts to improve the article. At the same time it seems there is quite a bit of overlap with existing articles. See Thesis#Style and Style guide for example. If we get into the full contents of the style guide, it would seem to enter "how to" territory. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC)