Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Medicine (FWDS) |
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Behavioural science (FWDS) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''Delete''' Fails [[WP:GNG]]. Google scholar has "Developing a new paradigm for stuttering." listed as cited twice. While practitioners Bodenhamer and Margolina, and a couple of others, mention or use the hexagon, it has not caught on so as to meet the paradigm equivalent of [[WP:ACADEMIC|WP:ACADEMIC#1]]. It is not a reason for deletion, but it is interesting that the [[Stuttering]] article, at the time I write this, did not mention the hexagon or J. Harrison. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 16:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' Fails [[WP:GNG]]. Google scholar has "Developing a new paradigm for stuttering." listed as cited twice. While practitioners Bodenhamer and Margolina, and a couple of others, mention or use the hexagon, it has not caught on so as to meet the paradigm equivalent of [[WP:ACADEMIC|WP:ACADEMIC#1]]. It is not a reason for deletion, but it is interesting that the [[Stuttering]] article, at the time I write this, did not mention the hexagon or J. Harrison. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 16:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine|list of Medicine-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine|list of Medicine-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Behavioural science|list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 17:14, 20 July 2014
- Stuttering Hexagon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly-sourced promotional article lacks third-party sources or evidence of notability per WP:GNG. Sourced with primary sources, blogs, and an Amazon link. Google Scholar search shows little in the way of reliable third-party coverage. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- delete. From the talk page and history someone is being paid to edit this on WP which is completely unacceptable; other than that per nomination.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 16:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. Google scholar has "Developing a new paradigm for stuttering." listed as cited twice. While practitioners Bodenhamer and Margolina, and a couple of others, mention or use the hexagon, it has not caught on so as to meet the paradigm equivalent of WP:ACADEMIC#1. It is not a reason for deletion, but it is interesting that the Stuttering article, at the time I write this, did not mention the hexagon or J. Harrison. --Bejnar (talk) 16:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)