Content deleted Content added
Colonel Warden (talk | contribs) |
Guillaume2303 (talk | contribs) →Stephen Coles: delete |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Delete''' - As per Pete.Hurd. Again another that fails [[WP:BIO]]. - [[User:Galloglass|<font color="#003900">'''Gallo'''</font><font color="#007600">'''glass'''</font>]] 22:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - As per Pete.Hurd. Again another that fails [[WP:BIO]]. - [[User:Galloglass|<font color="#003900">'''Gallo'''</font><font color="#007600">'''glass'''</font>]] 22:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Evident notability. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] 23:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Evident notability. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] 23:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as per Pete Hurd's meticulous research. Colonel, the notability clearly is not "evident". What evidence do you have to support that statement? --[[User:Crusio|Crusio]] 23:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:52, 11 November 2007
Stephen Coles
- Stephen Coles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No evidence or assertion of notability, does not meet WP:PROF. The subject is an academic researcher, but there are no refs from independent reliable sources, and the article's main claim of Coles's significance appears to be as a co-founder of the Gerontology Research Group. The article was created by a member of the Gerontology Research Group, Robert Young (longevity claims researcher)/User:Ryoung122. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO - Kittybrewster ☎ 14:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- In my opinion Stephen Coles does satisfy the notability requirement because it is highly likely that he has participated in more autopsies of supercentenarians than any other individual alive. The study of the causes of death in supercentenarians gives us significantly greater insight into the processes of aging and disease in the elderly. His contributions to the GRG which is one of the foremost groups studying aging and longevity are significant. He is also extremely active in efforts to increase funding for stem cell research. He participates in a number of editorial and board positions and has organized conferences related to anti-aging medicine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertBradbury (talk • contribs) 14:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Reply. Organising conferences and holding board positions doesn't establish notability. That needs non-trivial coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 19:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- delete the article claims that Coles is a "Professor at the UCLA", but I can't find his faculty web page. I find this where he's called " visiting scholar, Department of Computer Science", and this he's billed as "assistant researcher in the Department of Surgery", the only other reference to him that I can find in a departmental page is on the list of <$900 contributors to Donors to the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine ([1]). Other than that there's one article in the campus paper on the GRG (which the article describes as a group "which meets at the UCLA Medical Center" .... "once a month to disseminate information and to discuss recent news in regards to aging") which mentions him. Of course, he's mentioned, (as "L. Stephen Coles, GRG System Administrator/Webmaster") in this GRG web page is hosted at UCLA, but that page begins with several layers of boilerplate dissociating itself from UCLA, which is a bit odd. In short, I doubt the veracity of the article's first sentence, and therefore recommend deletion. Pete.Hurd 20:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - As per Pete.Hurd. Again another that fails WP:BIO. - Galloglass 22:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Evident notability. Colonel Warden 23:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per Pete Hurd's meticulous research. Colonel, the notability clearly is not "evident". What evidence do you have to support that statement? --Crusio 23:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC)