Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''Keep''' There has been coverage in local newspapers which I found after a simple search and have added to the article.[[User:Vahvistus|Vahvistus]] ([[User talk:Vahvistus|talk]]) 20:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' There has been coverage in local newspapers which I found after a simple search and have added to the article.[[User:Vahvistus|Vahvistus]] ([[User talk:Vahvistus|talk]]) 20:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
*It seems that, apart from one article from Salford and some passing mentions, you also added articles which aren't about the British party, but about the international one, e.g. [https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/5871960 this] and [https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/glasgow-climate-protest-live-thousands-25393297?fbclid=IwAR09hwrW3osIYQA0Ets7HfEZPUA8oXEtFH_s2osm7ADgW-3Z4_ruwGoK5hk this]. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 07:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:34, 5 April 2022
Socialist Alternative (England, Wales & Scotland)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Socialist Alternative (England, Wales & Scotland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability, only been written about in far-left minor publications (note: the Weekly Worker link[1] does not address this group directly), but not in reliable, independent sources. A fringe group with no political results or importance so far, and which has failed to get real attention since the split. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- For reference to repeat what I commented when removing WP:PROD - this is a stub which requires further work, however even in its current form meets notability test. Multiple reliable independent secondary sources have been provided. For the two additional comments: the Weekly Worker link references CWI Majority which is noted in the article and "failed to get real attention since the split" WP:NTEMP seems relevant. Sirrontail (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- It didn't get attention from RS then, and it hasn't received attention since. Right below NTEMP is WP:SUSTAINED... My comment about the Weekly Worker is because that is the best source of the lot, but it isn't about the subject, so doesn't help for notability. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep There has been coverage in local newspapers which I found after a simple search and have added to the article.Vahvistus (talk) 20:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)