Content deleted Content added
Yevgeni Preobrazhensky (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Keep''' There has been coverage in local newspapers which I found after a simple search and have added to the article.[[User:Vahvistus|Vahvistus]] ([[User talk:Vahvistus|talk]]) 20:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' There has been coverage in local newspapers which I found after a simple search and have added to the article.[[User:Vahvistus|Vahvistus]] ([[User talk:Vahvistus|talk]]) 20:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
*It seems that, apart from one article from Salford and some passing mentions, you also added articles which aren't about the British party, but about the international one, e.g. [https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/5871960 this] and [https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/glasgow-climate-protest-live-thousands-25393297?fbclid=IwAR09hwrW3osIYQA0Ets7HfEZPUA8oXEtFH_s2osm7ADgW-3Z4_ruwGoK5hk this]. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 07:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
*It seems that, apart from one article from Salford and some passing mentions, you also added articles which aren't about the British party, but about the international one, e.g. [https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/5871960 this] and [https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/glasgow-climate-protest-live-thousands-25393297?fbclid=IwAR09hwrW3osIYQA0Ets7HfEZPUA8oXEtFH_s2osm7ADgW-3Z4_ruwGoK5hk this]. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 07:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
'''Keep''' |
|||
Clearly notable, mentioned in several local newspaper articles which are reputable secondary sources |
Revision as of 11:55, 5 April 2022
Socialist Alternative (England, Wales & Scotland)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Socialist Alternative (England, Wales & Scotland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability, only been written about in far-left minor publications (note: the Weekly Worker link[1] does not address this group directly), but not in reliable, independent sources. A fringe group with no political results or importance so far, and which has failed to get real attention since the split. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- For reference to repeat what I commented when removing WP:PROD - this is a stub which requires further work, however even in its current form meets notability test. Multiple reliable independent secondary sources have been provided. For the two additional comments: the Weekly Worker link references CWI Majority which is noted in the article and "failed to get real attention since the split" WP:NTEMP seems relevant. Sirrontail (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- It didn't get attention from RS then, and it hasn't received attention since. Right below NTEMP is WP:SUSTAINED... My comment about the Weekly Worker is because that is the best source of the lot, but it isn't about the subject, so doesn't help for notability. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep There has been coverage in local newspapers which I found after a simple search and have added to the article.Vahvistus (talk) 20:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- It seems that, apart from one article from Salford and some passing mentions, you also added articles which aren't about the British party, but about the international one, e.g. this and this. Fram (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep
Clearly notable, mentioned in several local newspaper articles which are reputable secondary sources