Content deleted Content added
bolded delete vote + relist |
Miami33139 (talk | contribs) →Snuff (song): *'''Pause the discussion and start over in a few weeks.''' |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<hr style="width:50%;" /> |
<hr style="width:50%;" /> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|<font color=#BF3B30>Relisted</font>]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:JForget|<font color = "orange">'''JForget''' </font>]] 13:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snuff (song)|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}} |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|<font color=#BF3B30>Relisted</font>]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:JForget|<font color = "orange">'''JForget''' </font>]] 13:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snuff (song)|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}} |
||
*'''Pause the discussion and start over in a few weeks.''' Without reliable sources independent of the band, it should go away; '''HOWEVER''', the single will be released in 5 days. It is a well formatted article with some prose and there is no point in losing that. The bands fans should do the work and make sure it has sources to show notability within the next few days. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 15:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:36, 23 September 2009
Snuff (song)
- Snuff (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
contested prod, lacks 3rd party sources, does not meet WP:NSONGS RadioFan (talk) 20:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- This page should be deleted. The band haven't confirmed if it will even be a single yet, only Metal Hammer. So we have absolutely no clue, because it has not been officialy confirmed. I don't think Wikipedia needs a page based on something that is not YET fact. Bring the page back if the fact is proven later, but for now, this is a speculation page. Epeu (talk) 03:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment the reference added is an ad from the band in a music publication. As a primary source it doesn't do much to establish the notability of this topic. It may be notable one day, but not today.--RadioFan (talk) 22:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 13:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pause the discussion and start over in a few weeks. Without reliable sources independent of the band, it should go away; HOWEVER, the single will be released in 5 days. It is a well formatted article with some prose and there is no point in losing that. The bands fans should do the work and make sure it has sources to show notability within the next few days. Miami33139 (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)