Poeticbent (talk | contribs) -- |
Nihil novi (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Wikipedia is not a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ivo_Schricker&diff=260022926&oldid=239418694 depository for genealogy trivia]. -- [[User:Matthead|Matthead]] [[User_talk:Matthead|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;"><small> Discuß </small></font>]] 18:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Wikipedia is not a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ivo_Schricker&diff=260022926&oldid=239418694 depository for genealogy trivia]. -- [[User:Matthead|Matthead]] [[User_talk:Matthead|<font style="color:#ffff00;background:#0000cc;"><small> Discuß </small></font>]] 18:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Cited sources I checked although somewhat related, don't seem to support any of the specific data. Family might actually be mentioned somewhere if offline references are accepted on good faith but the links lead nowhere, leaving a bad feeling. --[[User:Poeticbent|<font face="Papyrus" color="darkblue"><b>Poeticbent</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Poeticbent|<small><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk</font></small>]] 20:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Cited sources I checked although somewhat related, don't seem to support any of the specific data. Family might actually be mentioned somewhere if offline references are accepted on good faith but the links lead nowhere, leaving a bad feeling. --[[User:Poeticbent|<font face="Papyrus" color="darkblue"><b>Poeticbent</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Poeticbent|<small><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk</font></small>]] 20:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete.''' Wikipedia is not a place for non-notable individuals' ''[[Roots: The Saga of an American Family|Roots]]'' describing other largely non-notable relatives. [[User:Nihil novi|Nihil novi]] ([[User talk:Nihil novi|talk]]) 23:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:33, 25 December 2008
Radwan Dąbrowski-Żądło Family
- Radwan Dąbrowski-Żądło Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The family doesn't seem notable. Don't be fooled by seeming plentiful refs: they are not about the family. The better referenced part of the article consists of poor forks of info about Polish general history and nobility in specific. Next, several members of the family are described, the first one has any notability claims and has a separate article; perhaps Stefan Tytus Zygmunt Dąbrowski may also be notable, nobody else seems to be. The family might have had one notable member and the name been mentioned in a historical chronicle or two, but that doesn't make them notable. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radwan Dąbrowski-Żądło Family for last year's nom. I suggest deleting the article, and if there is consensus, splitting the section on "Stefan Tytus Zygmunt Dąbrowski" into its own article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a depository for genealogy trivia. -- Matthead Discuß 18:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Cited sources I checked although somewhat related, don't seem to support any of the specific data. Family might actually be mentioned somewhere if offline references are accepted on good faith but the links lead nowhere, leaving a bad feeling. --Poeticbent talk 20:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a place for non-notable individuals' Roots describing other largely non-notable relatives. Nihil novi (talk) 23:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)