Content deleted Content added
Phil Bridger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12:
::OK, I see what happened now. It seems that I forgot to actually remove the prod tag, even though I had stated that that was my intention, but some IP user came along afterwards and removed it anyway with that strange edit summary. That wasn't me. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 11:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep/Redirect''' Some mild notability is established, but I think we'd be better off moving most of the contents to the magazine's article [[User:Corpx|Corpx]] ([[User talk:Corpx|talk]]) 10:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
* '''Strong Keep''' and '''Bad Faith'''- the coincidence of this occuring 1 day after I had one of faithless pages deleted cannot be ignored, and likewise I feel a contest which is published and held by prestigious magazines like Slate is clearly notable. No evidence of a persuasive sort to the contrary.[[User:JJJ999|JJJ999]] ([[User talk:JJJ999|talk]]) 11:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 11:36, 28 January 2008
Most Phallic Building contest
- Most Phallic Building contest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Prod removed by author. I tried to clean this up a few months ago, but no notability has been established. It was a one-off contest by a quasi-notable magazine; notability is not inherited. As far as the references listed go, the first is a dead link, the second and third are blogs, the fourth is someone's personal website, the fifth is not free and the sixth is to the magazine itself, which can't be used to establish notability. If anything, this should be a redirect to Cabinet (magazine) faithless (speak) 08:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or merge into Cabinet (magazine). No notability as an award. Vegaswikian (talk) 08:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note Some editing has been done to the article, so the order of the references as described in the nomination is now different. The first link (Kansas City Star) has been fixed, but it goes to a non-free article. Two sources have been added, both of which mention the contest only briefly. faithless (speak) 08:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete or Merge although "the brick dick" is pretty funny, this doesn't seem very notable on it's own Beeblbrox (talk) 09:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Very weak keep the sources aren't great (mainly blog posts and the like), but they're not too bad given the topic so I think that this just scrapes past WP:N. If it's deleted the title could be added to WP:FREAKY and if it survives it should definetly be listed at WP:ODD. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Actually I removed the prod, and I'm not the author - I'd never heard of this before I came across the article with a prod tag on it. There's nothing that says that sources need to be available online, or without paying. Anyway I've fixed the Kansas City Star link, and you can check the Esquire reference at any decent library in the English-speaking world. I've also added references from the Los Angeles Times, The Age and a book published by a major publisher of works on architecture. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps I was incorrect; you made this edit? I assumed it was the author of the article as 1. the IP has edited the same articles as JJJ999 and 2. the edit summary appears to be signed. Cheers, faithless (speak) 10:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I see what happened now. It seems that I forgot to actually remove the prod tag, even though I had stated that that was my intention, but some IP user came along afterwards and removed it anyway with that strange edit summary. That wasn't me. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep/Redirect Some mild notability is established, but I think we'd be better off moving most of the contents to the magazine's article Corpx (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep and Bad Faith- the coincidence of this occuring 1 day after I had one of faithless pages deleted cannot be ignored, and likewise I feel a contest which is published and held by prestigious magazines like Slate is clearly notable. No evidence of a persuasive sort to the contrary.JJJ999 (talk) 11:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)