Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
RachelBrown (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
*'''Keep''' [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]] 13:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]] 13:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' If there were lists of this detail for other "ethnicities," I'd consider keeping --- but I sense some underlying intentions with these lists. [[User:Antidote|Antidote]] 17:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' If there were lists of this detail for other "ethnicities," I'd consider keeping --- but I sense some underlying intentions with these lists. [[User:Antidote|Antidote]] 17:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
** Of course there's an underlying intention in my case - to record the contributions of the Jewish people to civilisation. I'm not sure about the list of Jewish criminals, and maybe that should go. Otherwise, I'm just bewildered by the general hostility to these lists. I wonder about the underlying intention of this hostility, and how many well-meaning people are being taken in by it. - [[User:RachelBrown|RachelBrown]] 21:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:35, 17 November 2005
List of Jewish publishers
Finishing incomplete nomination Nandesuka 11:48, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete One of the many spawnlings of listmania. There's a reason wikipedia does not have list of Muslim publishers, list of Atheist publishers, list of Buddhist publishers
- Keep Yet another anonymous person seeking the deletion of a list of Jews. Why do people keep doing this? The arguments for keeping these lists have been well rehearsed in previous requests for deletion, and have always been accepted.
RachelBrown 22:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC)- No they haven't. See the yesterday's AFD on List of Jewish bankers. - Mgm|(talk) 12:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- They haven't yet been accepted for that article - Londoneye 09:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- No they haven't. See the yesterday's AFD on List of Jewish bankers. - Mgm|(talk) 12:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Why do people continously make these ridiculously specifi lists when no other lists of the like are made? EscapeArtistsNeverDie 22:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't feed the conspiracy theorists. Nandesuka 23:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Can this be used for anything but anti-Semitic purposes? --Maru (talk) Contribs 23:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Sets bad precedent. Religion and profession are rarely related. Serves no useful purpose. - Mgm|(talk) 12:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per arguments given above and at the List of Jewish bankers AfD. Anville 12:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Trivial Carina22 12:44, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per above. BDAbramson T 14:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Categorize members of the list to Category:Publishers and Category:Jewish [Foobarians] according to nationality, then delete the list, so no information is actually lost. ~~~~ 14:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Categorify and delete, per Freak. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 15:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - more unnecessary listcruft (as in who gives a damn what religion these guys are?). I would have voted to keep if this had been an actual list of publishing houses that produce books in the language or about exclusively Jewish topics, but this list ain't it. 23skidoo 16:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Lists of Jews have been deleted, not kept. See List of Jewish members of the French Academy of Sciences, List of Jewish members of the Russian Academy of Sciences... howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 17:34, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Note that others have been kept, such as Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Jews itself. Not that I think this should survive myself. — Haeleth Talk
- Delete or merge with list of deleted lists that tied various Jews to their occupations. Youngamerican 19:02, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Categorize and delete per Freakofnurture. — Haeleth Talk 21:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete no more encyclopedic than List of Methodist dentists. Durova 23:39, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep — if the contents are valid. — RJH 01:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Why on earth do we need to make lists of people by race/religion/ethnicity? Of what possible use is such a list is this? Is anyone ever going to type “List of Jewish publishers” into the search box? ♠DanMS 01:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- For some people, examples of accomplished individuals belonging to their shared faith is a significant source of pride and role models. This is just PC-ness run amuck. This type of information is going to be maintained somewhere, so why not do it here and make a proper, balanced, nPoV job of it? — RJH
- This is not my reason for why I create religion involved lists. Otherwise I wouldn't hace created lists for religions where I have never even met anyone of the given faith. Religion is interesting to me as are religious people. I don't like reading in column form and by creating lists people can categorize them later. That said this might be too specific so I'm just not voting in this case.--T. Anthony 17:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- For some people, examples of accomplished individuals belonging to their shared faith is a significant source of pride and role models. This is just PC-ness run amuck. This type of information is going to be maintained somewhere, so why not do it here and make a proper, balanced, nPoV job of it? — RJH
- Delete per nomination. Jtmichcock 03:03, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per MacGyverMagic. Turnstep 03:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep LazarKr 07:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - Do we really want to adopt the French position of refusing to keep statistics by ethnicity? Look where it's got them. - Londoneye 09:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per all the foregoing. → Ξxtreme Unction {yakłblah} 12:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Jews can regard themselves as a nation so, if French publishers, American publishers etc. are allowed this should be also. Arniep 12:26, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I abhor the attitude that Jews aren't allowed the same self-identity as anyone else. - Poetlister 12:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Astrokey44 13:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete If there were lists of this detail for other "ethnicities," I'd consider keeping --- but I sense some underlying intentions with these lists. Antidote 17:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Of course there's an underlying intention in my case - to record the contributions of the Jewish people to civilisation. I'm not sure about the list of Jewish criminals, and maybe that should go. Otherwise, I'm just bewildered by the general hostility to these lists. I wonder about the underlying intention of this hostility, and how many well-meaning people are being taken in by it. - RachelBrown 21:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)